• Full Story

90-day employment rule 'double disadvantage' to youth

Print

Mon, 19 Jul 2010 5:32a.m.

Critics of the 90-rule say employers will be less likely to take a chance on young workers (Reuters file)

Critics of the 90-rule say employers will be less likely to take a chance on young workers (Reuters file)

By Vaughan Elder of NZPA

New Zealand youth will be unfairly hit by the extension of the 90-day probation period as they often enter the workplace under-prepared, says Equal Employment Opportunities Commissioner Judy McGregor.

A report by the Human Rights Commission concluded that New Zealand's youth were going into their first jobs under-prepared and this would put youth at a disadvantage when on probation, Dr McGregor said.

"If they are ill-prepared for the work place in the first place and then they face a probationary period, then they are at a double disadvantage," she said.

The findings of the National Conversation about Work report come after the Government announced yesterday it will extend a 90-day-trial period to all employers, with Prime Minister John Key saying the change will provide greater opportunities to people looking for jobs.

Ds McGregor, who led the two-year project, said successive governments had failed New Zealand's young people by not giving them enough career advice or apprenticeship options.

"Currently, we are failing too many young people who are not well prepared for their first job," she said.

"The National Conversation about Work showed there was a need for every young person, not just some, to have access to quality school-based careers advice, the ability to access apprenticeships or other launch pads in their regions," Dr McGregor said.

The extension of the 90-day probationary period to all employers would probably not make employers more likely to take a chance on young people and would instead make employers less likely to invest in their young workers, she said.

"I think it means that there's less obligation on employers to actually invest in people during that 90 days and I think that will be tragedy for young people," Dr McGregor said.

The probationary period may also make employers lazy about who they recruit.

"Employers may just become slacker about recruitment, instead of trying to hire the best person for the job," she said.

A youth-to-work plan for every young New Zealander, to improve employment prospects and choices, was a major recommendation of the report, Ds McGregor said.

The recommendation comes a day after the Government announced a number of employment law changes including the extension of the 90-day probation period, when new employees can be sacked without taking a grievance case, to all businesses.

Prime Minister John Key told delegates at National's annual conference that the changes would give job seekers greater opportunities.

"This is a policy of opportunity," he told more than 600 applauding delegates.

"It is about giving people the chance to find a job and nothing is more important than that."

The report which was a two-year project and represented the views of over 3000 employers and employees was also concerned about employers' bias against certain groups.

"The high unemployment of young Maori and Pacific people and the current bias against hiring some young people are issues we all need to be concerned about," said Dr McGregor.

NZPA

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

21 Jul 2010 12:32p.m.

peter wrote:

Baboosh - have you considered the alternative possibility that, unlike yourself, your mates are earning more because they can spell and have a comparatively greater grasp of the english language? Seriously though, you are correct. Incomes in New Zealand are too low, and it is inevitable a large number of our most qualified will leave for overseas. You go where you are valued. The problem is not the 90 days nonsense - the problem is the 5 years work and still very close to minimum wage nonsense. For most of us, the deal is not good enough here, and I do admit to harbouring some resentment that to make a good life for my family I almost certainly have to leave home. Australia is the obvious choice and its proximity enables frequent travel back home to visit family and friends, although these days I generally have to travel to Australia to see them anyway. I'm sick of the parochial nonsense about how great we are, and the naive beliefs we have about how other see us. So don't ask me to stay out of loyalty while others line their pockets. And don't ask me to hang in there while things get sorted, because for those without qualifications who are stuck here, you'll get low pay for a long time until eventually your job vanishes overseas because your boss can't possibly compete.

20 Jul 2010 06:29a.m.

Helen1 wrote:

Yes NZ is quite different Jan and it aint about money either. Its about herding people beyond the point of no return in search of the gold that doesnt glitter Money to pay for this and that which damn will doesnt exist at all so get that right and do you systematic homework dear!while youve goy it which is called technollogy computer and the truth is on the internet everywhere.

19 Jul 2010 11:02p.m.

Baboosh wrote:

Kathy, I agree, my mates over in OZ or UK and even Hong Kong and Dubai are making much more money and having much more opportunities. I am saddened to say this, but same degree and a HUGE difference between what we get to do and what we get paid to do it! I feel like a loser every time I compare my life with theirs. John key and his buddies seem to be BLIND and DEFF. How making education less accessible/ living more expensive can improve the quality of life for average NZers, John Key does not give a damn, he works for the rich and they always need more cleaners and builders.

19 Jul 2010 01:02p.m.

Helen1 wrote:

Young people in NZ "dont forget your roots" your mana and land is here not Australia- cos they face the same predicament as us presently- so dont be fooled into quiting our beautiful heartland New Zealand cos its in the blood not the glitter thats all gold. Good luck to all New Zeanders!

19 Jul 2010 11:49a.m.

Helen1 wrote:

This sort of harvesring and herding our young people to the slaughterhouse is definitely a gross injustice in the making with dire consequences for all NewZealanders to be on the Alert for the masses of unemplyment undoubtedly created for this situation. God Help Us All Please?! cos the devil is.

19 Jul 2010 11:35a.m.

Alex wrote:

An American economics professor was very surprised when he found out New Zealand had a 90 day trial law and called it (paraphrasing) "extremely free market." New Zealand actually already has some of the most liberal employment laws in the world. Where do you get your information that "most countries" already have laws like this? John Howard tried it in Australia and it cost him an election.

19 Jul 2010 11:01a.m.

kathy wrote:

The young people, especially young men should set their sights on Aus - Nz policies are too harsh, whether it be education or employment. You are given an IRD number; then ignored - you are only a few stations up from the sheep. Think of your future and go to Aus, Nz is a fabolous playground for the wealthy to enjoy "quality of life". Yes, go to Aus & get a life have peace & be happy!

19 Jul 2010 09:04a.m.

cyril wrote:

I would say it would be to youths advantage because you are more likely to give someone a go rather than not bothering because you would be stuck with them. Not many employers I know enjoy sacking people.

19 Jul 2010 08:21a.m.

Ian wrote:

What rubbish. Most all countries have a similar system. Is NZ somehow different ? NZ's version is very equal to both. This will help peopLe in to work. The left and the unions are scaremongering yet again.