ACC changes: good news for all?

Print

Thu, 02 Jun 2011 8:48a.m.

ACC Minister Nick Smith announced the changes yesterday

ACC Minister Nick Smith announced the changes yesterday

By Ally Mullord

Yesterday’s Government announcement that ACC is soon expected to face private competition has critics concerned, with some saying opening up workplace insurance to private providers could lead to more suffering for victims.

Business New Zealand Economist John Pask joined Firstline this morning to discuss whether or not New Zealanders need to be worried.

He says Business NZ supports the move, which gives employers the ability to choose their insurance provider - ACC or a private company.  

"It’s very, very important that we get the best possible scheme for both employers as businesses, and their employees," he says.

Mr Pask thinks the added competition to the workplace insurance market will also be beneficial, as it will make sure ACC is “providing the type of services, the insurance packages and the rehabilitation rates that employers and their employees demand".

He says the average worker shouldn’t be concerned that their cover will be decreased.

"Absolutely not… I think there's been a wee bit of misinformation about this. The minimum standards are actually set out in the accident insurance act, and so that's not going to change at all,” he says.

“Whether you go to a private insurer or are retained by ACC, nothing's going to change in that respect."

If a private insurance company collapses or reneges on cover, New Zealanders can feel secure that they will still be covered.

"In the very remote chance that an insurer collapses, our understanding from the discussion document is that those claims will go back to ACC," Mr Pask says.

The Labour Party says the only way the insurance industry can profit from the move is by reducing entitlements or increasing cost, but Mr Pask disagrees, saying the move may lower premiums.

"Insurers will have strong incentives to ensure rapid rehabilitation in the workplace, they'll have strong incentives through competition to ensure that their premiums reflect risk in the individual workplace… and so it is likely that premiums in a large number of cases will decline."

Watch the video for the full interview

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

02 Jun 2011 07:00p.m.

Len wrote:

Surprise surprise Business NZ supports the move! Then Mr Pask makes it clear that he has no clue about what he is commenting about. "in the very remote chance that an insurer collapses""claims will go back to ACC" claimants got shafted when HIH went bust because ACC would not take over their claims even after cases were refered to Disputes Resolution Services. Months later QBE became the claimants insurer by default. Who was stressed over the situation? Certainly not employers who accepted HIH employees cover for one reason only. Cheaper premiums. Mr Pask also says "the move may lower premiums" "it is likely that premiums in a large number of cases will decline" where in this maybe, could be, might be, load of rubbish, is the justice or consultation with employees? Yes they are the ones that have to suck it and see! Now what about an industry that sells, say forklifts, but their income predominantly comes from repairing forklifts. This company will fight tooth and nail with ACC to have their premiums based on being a forklift sales company. Why? because their premiums are much higher as a service industry not a sales industry. So it is OK for business's to benefit by grey areas but employees shouldn't have the same luxuries. Employees should never believe that privatisation of the ACC scheme is either in their favour or even neutral because they are the ones that will pay when their accident number comes up.

02 Jun 2011 04:14p.m.

Maximus wrote:

For goodness sake, who voted the National Party in? The country is always miserable under a National Govt - it just takes a while for them to remember.

02 Jun 2011 04:09p.m.

Kim wrote:

Thats not really a fair representation of what will happen though is it Brent..The likey senario would be a employer deciding wheather he wants to pay ACC or a cheaper alternative... Its not like the govt is saying..if your employees want to change systems we will cut your acc payments. they are saying that the employer decides and you have to put up with what he chooses. Its about cutting costs for employers not employees..

02 Jun 2011 12:56p.m.

Brent wrote:

@Kim, American Combined would be one of NZ biggest Accident Insurers with good reason, 90% of worker that are currently covered pay there own way. If a employee came to me and said he wanted me to cover this I would as long as I did not have to pay ACC.

02 Jun 2011 12:45p.m.

Jo wrote:

To be fair my son has had a rotten run of luck lately and had three injuries, 2 requiring hospitalisation in the space of 8 weeks. Each time ACC have covered him, acted promptly and he has had no issues whatsoever, neither has his employer.

02 Jun 2011 11:06a.m.

Kim wrote:

Well you can be sure that if business NZ say its a good idea you can bet its not good for employees. Talk about self serving bs..

02 Jun 2011 10:52a.m.

maria wrote:

Please, we need to get rid of ACC as they are a bunch of uncaring, horrible ppeople. You wouldnt believe the nightmares they have caused families especially when it comes to the health system. They look to offer help when you are injured but make you look like a blugger on a benefit, when I have payed my Acc Levies all my life. Have a heart ACC at least you still have a job and I have a family to support. NZ is having their own earthquake right now thanks to National. Can you help us too.

02 Jun 2011 10:46a.m.

jj wrote:

God save those who gets injured

02 Jun 2011 09:36a.m.

Andrew wrote:

Competition is the only way to go !
Last time ACC was privatised huge changes were made and the costs of delivery drastically reduced for many Employers.
When privatisation was stopped ACC made many systemic changes which resulted in better and lower cost of delivery of the schemeas as a result of what the insurers had implemented. Even now there are still many abuses of the ACC where many work place claims are accepted without any consultation with Employers. Doctors should not be permitted to accept claims, particularly work place claims, without referral to the Employer. Choice is the only way to go.

02 Jun 2011 09:00a.m.

Aron wrote:

God save New Zealand