ACC's 'clever' ruse to slow down motorists

Print

Tue, 09 Feb 2010 5:38p.m.

The 'cameras' don't work, but trigger in-car radar detectors

The 'cameras' don't work, but trigger in-car radar detectors

By Kim Choe

It has been revealed ACC has been using trickery to slow down drivers with a need for speed. They have installed old police radars in trouble spots to trigger a false warning to cars with radar detectors that police are nearby.

But in a new twist, it may be police who will now try and pull a double con.

It took one very observant gadget geek to detect ACC's cunning plan to slow down speeding motorists.

"I drive along this road fairly regularly, and a couple of months ago I noticed I was getting a strong alert on my radar detector and there was no police car out, and this happened every time I was driving along this stretch of road," says Bob Prangnell.

A quick look around revealed an old police radar, known as a drone, mounted on a power pole. Seventy of these have been installed around the country in the past year to make drivers with radar detectors think the police are nearby.

"I think it's quite a clever idea actually," says Mr Prangnell. "Especially my initial concern was that they might be spending a lot of money on this, but it seems that they're not."

In fact, the whole programme has only cost $7000, a small price says ACC, considering one crash causing a serious injury can cost it $50,000.

But now that the ruse has been exposed, it might have lost some of its usefulness.

"I'm not sure how effective it will be, because people that drive along the road regularly will obviously know it's there, but people that are driving on roads they don't know will maybe have an effect," says Mr Prangnell.

But ACC says there are other ways the drones can be used. It has already had calls from school bus operators in Palmerston North and Christchurch who want to install them in their vehicles.

There could also be a real sting in this for speeding drivers. ACC told 3 News it has been contacted by police who want to know where the drones are located so they can station real police cars there.

3 News

 

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

17 Feb 2010 02:17p.m.

Kim wrote:

@lewis
Could you rewrite that comment please as i keep on running out of beath trying to read it. A couple of full stops to break it up a little would be nice.
I'm pretty bad at punctuation myself but still....
Anyway.. I'm sure you make some intellegent points and a very good breakdown of the issues its just they are a little hard to follow.
Cheers

11 Feb 2010 11:38a.m.

lewis wrote:

Kim regarding your comment on letting people know about this little plan for recognition of someones self worth into giving it away is a little far fetched as i have know about these for a we while now as it becomes pretty obvious after consistent false alerts as radars these are so sophisticated they don't give false alerts an being that ive set up a site on where exsacly these things are an what they look like they marse well let the country know an get some deserved credit because thankfully not everyone in this country is an brainless moron like you an cant realise whats going on around them!

10 Feb 2010 05:46p.m.

Richard wrote:

I drive about 6000 km/month at our speed limits which at times are illogical although this is an effective way to avoid tickets. Our roads are woeful. If any organisiation in this country was actually serious about reducing the road toll a campaign to build proper motorways from smooth ashphelt with split lanes for opposing traffic, and the removal of the speed limit to separate the flowing traffic, would be far more effective than the current obsession with speed enforcment. If the automotive engineering advances over the last 30 years were factored out of the road toll equation, our road toll would no doubt be worse than 30 years ago!!! A rather sad and for many families tragic waste of money on futile anti-speed campaigns. Please spend my taxes more appropriately. As for alcohol related incidents, the best limit is NO DRINKS, i.e. adopt the current under 20 limit for everyone, then it is NEVER okay to drink and drive.

10 Feb 2010 11:42a.m.

Crazy Guy wrote:

Here's a crazy suggestion.
Why not just obey the speed limits? Or if your always late, leave ealier.

Strange as it may seem, there are some people out there who actually obey the law. If others think they are above it and get a speeding ticket, stiff titties! As far as I'm aware, speed limits are there for safety reasons, snd speeding tickets were invented as a deterent for those who ignore the speed limits.

If you don't want to get a speeding ticket, or you think it's all a big revenue gathering conspiracy, then don't speed!!

09 Feb 2010 11:07p.m.

easy goin' wrote:

All for extracing max fines from speeders, double the fines, double the demerit points, double the number of radar emitters . . .

09 Feb 2010 09:40p.m.

Si wrote:

I think that was probably originally the point Kim. People with scanners could previously be almost 100% sure there was police nearby. Now they can't be quite so sure its not fake, and if they risk that it is fake and turns out not to be....

09 Feb 2010 09:01p.m.

Kim wrote:

This was a really good idea till some fool at acc decided they needed a pat on the back for it. Now it will have the reverse effect and turn into a nice little earner for the police as now noone will slow down for even real cop signals because they will think its a fake.
Idiots