• Full Story

ACT: Key's 'huge mistake' will cost National

Print

Tue, 25 Aug 2009 12:00a.m.

John Boscawen (L) and John Key

John Boscawen (L) and John Key

Prime Minister John Key has made "a huge mistake" by refusing to change the so-called anti-smacking law and National will suffer for it at the next election, the ACT Party says.

"He is making exactly the same mistake as Helen Clark made - he is putting himself above the overwhelming wish of the majority of New Zealanders," MP John Boscawen told NZPA.

"I think he's making a very stupid mistake".

Mr Key yesterday said he was going to ensure parents were not prosecuted for an inconsequential smack but he wasn't going to change the law in response to the referendum result.

Voters faced the question: "Should a smack as part of good parental correction by a criminal offence in New Zealand?"

About 1.6 million ticked the boxes and nearly 88 percent said "no".

Mr Key said changes were likely to the way welfare officers handled complaints about light smacking and police would be asked to review their procedures to make sure good parents weren't treated like criminals.

"I am not going to allow that to happen to them and if the law shows, through its application, that New Zealand parents are criminalised or their children are taken off them in some bizarre case for what could only be described as minor or inconsequential smacking, then the law has to be changed," he said.

But the facts showed people were not being prosecuted and he wanted to find ways to assure parents that was not going to start happening.

Mr Boscawen said the referendum result was a clear, emphatic vote for the law to be changed.

"I think he's taking a very grave risk in ignoring such a massive mandate for a change to the law," he said.

"I think he's being very foolish, his response is totally inadequate and he's making a huge mistake."

Mr Boscawen said National's poll ratings would drop and the impact would carry through to the next election.

Family First, one of the referendum's main promoters, said MPs and ministers were receiving floods of e-mails demanding a law change.

"The referendum wasn't about recommendations, guidelines or comfort - it was about a law change," said Family First director Bob McCoskrie.

The Green Party congratulated Mr Key, saying he had resisted pressure from those who wanted to "re-legalise assault on children".

MP Sue Bradford, who drafted the 2007 law change, said Mr Key's response was appropriate.

NZPA / 3 News
Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

22 Nov 2009 08:12a.m.

Warren Matthews wrote:

to quote: "don 25 Aug 2009 5:26p.m. I second that vote lol.....NEVER EVER am I ever voting National again. Sorry Labour, Your prodigal son is back." "Anoop 25 Aug 2009 3:59p.m. NEVER EVER am I ever voting National again. Sorry Labour, Your prodigal son is back." Are you kidding me?! Labour NOT listening to you was why you voted National in the first place, can you seriously not remember that? It was only a year ago... please tell me those were written by Phil Geoff or Helen Clark and not someone from the NZ public who genuinely believes Labour is now our saviour. Don't Vote National, Don't Vote Labour.

27 Aug 2009 02:30p.m.

Brian Sinclair wrote:

John keys needed help getting into the PM job last elections. How can he and his party ignore 88% of 1.600 000 voters, Thats 1.408 000 voters lets all tell him at the next elections. Or are our memories really that short.

26 Aug 2009 03:52p.m.

Jim wrote:

"Should a smack as part of good parental correction be a criminal offence in New Zealand?"
I can not understand what is wrong with this wording unlike Sue Bradfords loosely worded bill that was passed. It is obvious 87% knew what it meant even if politicians and alike did not. I suggest they should go back to school!!!

25 Aug 2009 07:35p.m.

Pamela wrote:

Labour ignored the wishes of the people and I added it to my hate list. Greens - wake up to yourselves - it is nothing to do with assaulting a child. Assault and a smack are two totally different things. A smack is not a punch, a beating or meant to include weapons other than the palm of a hand. I agree with Act. I really like National and John Key and say that we, the people, have voted and said that we do not want to be made criminals for smacking. The last smack I gave my 3 yr old was for running out into the road around a school sign. She now waits for me even if the sign is out at the crossing. One swat in public and I was breaking the law but she is a lot safer now than she was. Please change the law as we requested and prosecute those that assault and abuse children violently.

25 Aug 2009 07:04p.m.

Chargone wrote:

actually, voting for Labour won't get you anywhere either, if you pay attention. the best hope this country has, over all, is to STOP voting for National or Labour. they're both completely useless vote for act. or the progressives. or, hell, even united future or the Alliance or some other random party. just stop reelecting the same two collections of idiots over and over and complaining that you don't get different results. the entire issue is an act of utter folly, and should never have come up in the first place: you cannot legislate morality. that alone should have killed off this idea right from the start.

25 Aug 2009 06:48p.m.

Andrew wrote:

This issue never had anything to do with party politics. Changes to the law were supported overwhelmingly by both sides of the house, so why now attempt to manipulate Key and National into adopting it as (party) policy. We were told well in advance that the referendum would be ignored. That is hardly surprising; how could anyone take such a poorly draughted referendum seriously? Did its author ever own up?

25 Aug 2009 06:24p.m.

Vish wrote:

If nothing was going to be done about the law then why waste "our" taxpayers millions of dollars in these hard times.I am sure most of the people are struggling in the current recession.The money could have been utilized in a better way.Just a huge mistake by the government. "It was just a waste of money and peoples time".

25 Aug 2009 05:26p.m.

don wrote:

I second that vote lol.....NEVER EVER am I ever voting National again. Sorry Labour, Your prodigal son is back.

25 Aug 2009 03:59p.m.

Anoop wrote:

NEVER EVER am I ever voting National again. Sorry Labour, Your prodigal son is back.

25 Aug 2009 03:59p.m.

Robert wrote:

Johan, countless parents smack children, as part of parenting, and it is not abuse. People in NZ do not believe it should be a criminal offence. While I do not know your overseas friends, I think that the people of NZ have spoken. Abuse was and should always be outlawed. Your comment is not useful to this discussion as it is overly simplistic, but so many are that think us parents want to beat our kids. We want to raise them to be great adults, like we were by our parents with love, and compassion. But on occasion we have to discipline them with various tools of parenting. A smack is part of that, and is not abuse. Show me some evidence that it is. 90% of adults would have been smacked growing up - are they all traumatised by it? Criminals? Lets tackle the real causes of child abuse.