• Full Story

Action needed on child poverty in NZ - report

Print

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 4:06a.m.

More action is needed to combat child poverty in New Zealand, CPAG says

More action is needed to combat child poverty in New Zealand, CPAG says

A new report from the Child Poverty Action Group (CPAG) says urgent action is needed to help the increasing numbers of New Zealand children who they say are being failed by the system.

The report, entitled ‘Left Further Behind’, was launched yesterday and makes several recommendations to improve the situation of children in New Zealand, including establishing a dedicated children's senior cabinet minister.

Report co-editor Dr Claire Dale says at least one in five New Zealand children experience “significant deprivation that compromises their health, their education, and their future”.

Recommendations made in the report include increased monitoring of child poverty indicators, removing work-based rules around financial assistance for low income families, and free healthcare access for all children under six.

CPAG says the facts of child poverty are well established, and the focus should shift to policy design, with co-editor Associate Professor Mike O’Brien saying New Zealand “has the means, we now just need the political will”.

Labour has welcomed the report, which deputy leader Annette King says “has mirrored much of the policy that has already been announced by Labour”.

She says Labour will be announcing new policies to combat child poverty in the near future.

Green Party co-leader Metiria Turei says the report lines up with the Greens’ plan to bring 100,000 children out of poverty by 2014 by talking about how “important it is to set a goal to end child poverty, and targets along the way”.

“We have four solutions: make Working for Families work for every low income family, provide better study support for sole parents and beneficiaries, raise the minimum wage to help working parents, and make sure rental properties are warm and healthy for kids," she says.

“I am gratified to see that these solutions are echoed in the recommendations of this report.”

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

14 Sep 2011 05:15p.m.

cherie wrote:

Matt very sorry the ladies here said you are being sarcastic. LOL you had me going for a while

14 Sep 2011 05:13p.m.

cherie wrote:

Matt in no way am I ashamed of what I said. I am not advocating sterilizing all who should never be allowed to breed what I am saying is give them a choice. The longer people like you carry on about fundamental human rights the longer children are going to be abused. I have no problem in helping those WHO WANT TO BE HELPED. Some are not able to be so fix that wee problem and it is finished. When the next child that is murdered by a parent that has had lots of help and keeps having children and keeps getting them taken off them I want people like you held responsible for that childs death. The longer we go on about "rights" the longer we let children be in danger. I do care for the vulnerable and I do so in my actions within my community but I cannot just keep on the righteous path that people like you follow allowing our children to be harmed. Hell lets up it to 100k.

13 Sep 2011 05:31p.m.

Matt Barker wrote:

@cherie - you ought to be ashamed of yourself dredging up the old line about how it's the parents fault, and "their parents don't deserve our help". How can you advocate the removal of a persons fundamental human right? I am not afraid to say that I am disgusted and appalled by your comment. We have a responsibility to care for both those who are vulnerable, through no fault of their own - i.e. these children. We also have a responsibility to those who are vulnerable, through the circumstance of their upbringing or life situation - i.e. their parents, who are, for whatever reason, unable to provide for them. Both need help and the former will not be truly helped until help comes to the latter.

13 Sep 2011 09:56a.m.

cherie wrote:

So in the nine years Annett was in why did she not fix it then when they had buckets of money. I think we also have to be aware that some people will not be good parents. It does not matter how much you try and educate them or how much money you give them they are just not parent material. Some very wealthy people are crap parents as well. It is a very tough job being a parent and if you dont have the skills passed down to you during your upbrining then chances are you are not going to learn later in life. When these peoiple are identified offer them an incentive not to breed like 50k for permenant contraception.This will also save money in the long run. I really do not see a problem with it. We allow abortions, so we are already allowing people the "opt out" option why not encourage it.

13 Sep 2011 08:58a.m.

Dianne wrote:

You think it is only children suffering