• Full Story

Air NZ may slash jobs to boost revenue

Print

Tue, 13 Dec 2011 6:01a.m.

Air New Zealand shares fell to their lowest level since mid-2009

Air New Zealand shares fell to their lowest level since mid-2009

Aviation experts say it is hardly surprising that Air New Zealand's reviewing its long-haul flight services.

The national carrier's losing $1 million a week on its long-haul network, including its daily services to London. Flights via Hong Kong and Los Angeles to London suffer huge fuel charges.

The airline wants to lift its annual profit by $110 million by 2015.

It posted a six-month loss of $37 million to the end of June following disruption to flights from earthquakes in Canterbury and Japan.

In a letter to staff last week, obtained by the Dominion Post, Air New Zealand chief executive Rob Fyfe said the company had to be prepared "to make some tough choices”.

"We need to reduce our costs to reflect the lower level of demand for air travel that we are likely to see in the coming 12 months and the increasing price competition as our competitors struggle to fill their aircraft."

It is understood all departments have also been told to shed budgets by 10 percent.

He said the company was holding a review to consider how to cut costs and boost income, and no part of the airline was safe, the Business Day website reports.

"There are no sacred cows," Mr Fyfe wrote.

Findings from the review are expected to be known in March 2012. However, there are rumours this afternoon will see a meeting between management and redundancies made to the supply chain.

An Air New Zealand spokesman said the company was not considering pulling out of London.

However, Mr Fyfe says Air New Zealand is looking to make changes to its sales and marketing teams in the United States and Britain to generate more revenue in those markets.

Job cuts there and at the airline's head office could number in the low hundreds, Business Day reports.

Aviation commentator Peter Clark says it is a tough time for airlines but it is not all doom and gloom.

“Air New Zealand is working very hard to survive,” he says. “We’ve seen that with its operations going with Virgin and buying a share of Virgin Airlines in Australian. The Trans-Tasman, they’re working very hard and doing well on that and into Pacific Islands.”

Their stocks fell as low as 91 cents on Monday, bringing its decline this year to 39 per cent, having traded at $1.53 in January. Air NZ shares fell to their lowest level since mid-2009.

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

13 Dec 2011 09:10p.m.

scarletsail wrote:

The only thing old I see with Air NZ,are the stewards and stewardess.Are there an pretty chik hostess on our planes.Otherwise fabulous.Been to LAX and Frisco 12 times with Air NZ,then 10 times with a European carrier onto Europe.The other 2 times Air New Zealand too London was much nicer. The other airlines including some Asia ones have some nice babe hostess tho

13 Dec 2011 08:57p.m.

aaron wrote:

Stop riding Air nz mercedes, its service is woeful, newest fleet around LOL, they don't even have a a340-500-600 or a A380,check their site still running pathetic 737's are those New LOL, didn't recently they had engine issues due to old aircraft, horrible airline, no where near as good as Emirate Singapore Cathay Thai Qantas etc

13 Dec 2011 03:45p.m.

Mercedes wrote:

I'm guessing Aaron doesn't fly a lot internationally. Spend some time on a North American airline and you'll have something other full service airlines to compare with. Air New Zealand's fleet is one of the newest around; on a good day their staff are outstanding and on a bad still better than anything I've encountered in Europe.

13 Dec 2011 01:16p.m.

Peter wrote:

"Slash jobs to boost revenue" is a hoot. Who wrote that? Dumb or Dumber. Sort of like the Keys' line of making the poor poorer - and we'll all be better off. Revenue and profit are very different. Dumping a few plebs won't increase revenue 1 cent. Maybe the RWC did. Perhaps, 'Air NZ Tightens Sphincter'- (byline)In view of worsening world economic outlook...latest casualty numbers...? 1930's, again?

13 Dec 2011 12:58p.m.

Aaron wrote:

John Key delivering his election promise 170,000 jobs no wait? should change that to 170k job losses, another industry has cut 145 jobs, I would never fly Air Nz so expensive, badly maintain aircraft, useless air staff. Never again.

13 Dec 2011 10:42a.m.

Working Kiwi wrote:

It's funny the airline waiting for the elections to announce loss of jobs for workers.Makes one wonder if the airline itself will go under the hammer and one more New Zealand asset will be sold to foreigners.

13 Dec 2011 09:56a.m.

Pinhead wrote:

Maybe Air NZ should work on slashing their prices first

13 Dec 2011 09:55a.m.

Chargone wrote:

yet more evidence of why privatizing infrastructure / running it as a business in it's own right rather doesn't work. infrastructure is not profitable, as a rule. rather, it supports and allows profit by other entities. also: more job cuts... wow, That's going to make it easier to find work. /s

13 Dec 2011 09:46a.m.

ian wrote:

A pity our politicians can't take a lead from this, and apply some "HARD" answers to our nations debt situation.