Alleged motorway gunman appears in court

Print

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:00a.m. UPDATED: 4:15PM

The alleged gunman in a motorway shootout with police, that ended in an innocent teenager's death, was a methamphetamine user with no memory of what happened, his lawyer said today.

Stephen Hohepa McDonald, 50, unemployed of New Lynn, appeared in Auckland District Court today on 29 charges related to the incident on Auckland's Northwestern motorway on Friday.

Halatau Naitoko, a 17-year-old courier driver, was caught in the crossfire and shot in the chest by a bullet from an armed offenders squad rifle -- prompting calls today from former police inspector and MP Ross Meurant and the Tongan Advisory Council for the officer who mistakenly shot Mr Naitoko to be charged in court.

Council chairman Melino Maka said he realised the shooting was not premeditated, but he believed it was still the unlawful killing of one person by another.

"In my dictionary, that means manslaughter. I don't see how the Naitoko family are going to get any form of justice in this situation," Mr Maka said.

"I think most New Zealanders would like to think that a law-abiding citizen, minding their own business, could not be shot to death by police in this country.

"While the police may have apprehended the man at the centre of the car chase, a 17-year-old is dead. You can't call that a satisfactory outcome," Mr Maka added.

He said the shooting of an innocent third party had set a nasty precedent in New Zealand policing history and the Tongan community and other New Zealanders would be watching closely to see how it is handled.

Mr Meurant told Newstalk ZB he was particularly concerned about what he called the police public relations campaign which jumped into action in the aftermath of the tragedy.

He claimed the Police Association moved into overdrive to protect police at the expense of upholding the law.

Mr Meurant said police could only shoot to kill when they feared death or grievous injury to themselves or someone else and when there was no other way to prevent it.

He questions the decision-making process that led to Mr Naitoko's death.

McDonald entered no plea in court today and made no application for bail. Ten of the charges alleged he used a firearm against police officers.

He was remanded in custody to reappear on February 5.

McDonald had no memory of what happened and was a methamphetamine user, his lawyer Roger Chambers said outside court today.

"The only part he does remember is a flat bed truck on the Northwestern motorway," Mr Chambers said outside the court.

"But he has no present recollection of anything that occurred before then.

"I don't know how long he has been using methamphetamine. He is suffering both emotionally and physically," Mr Chambers said.

McDonald has two teenage boys, and is estranged from his wife.

"I've had a fair amount of contact with my client. He is a very quiet person and he's quite torn up about this," Mr Chambers said.

As well as the charges of using a firearm against police, McDonald faced one charge of unlawful possession of a firearm in west Auckland and one of carrying a firearm with intent to resist arrest at the Glenora Rugby League Club, west Auckland.

There were four charges of converting a motor vehicle. He allegedly took a blue Toyota Corsa worth $5500, a green Toyota Hilux worth $5000, a green Hyundai worth $20,000 and a grey Nissan Skyline, worth $4500.

He also faced three charges of failing to stop, two of which were in New Lynn and one in Glen Eden.

He had three charges of reckless driving and three of driving while forbidden in New Lynn and Glen Eden.

There were also four charges of aggravated burglary in New Lynn, Glen Eden.

Police inquiries suggest the episode started with the theft of a vehicle in Symonds Street on or about January 6, Mr Chambers said.

NZPA

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

29 Jan 2009 11:18p.m.

Steve wrote:

This situation is a tragedy for all parties involved, but I feel it is important to highlight a few points. P use is not public enemy number one when it comes to drug use and addiction. Our only permitted radical intoxicant, alcohol, holds that title. Alcohol is consumed in varying degrees by as many as eighty to 90% of our population, and like P it has a disinhibiting effect on those who take it, and that is why people use it. We have seen innocents killed as a consequence of drug use before and one need only consider recent cases where people have used alcohol at parties and so on and driven cars into crowds of bystanders causing deaths and injuries. The fact the accused in this case alleges he has no recollection of events does not mean that this is a temporary insanity defence to the charges, just the same as if someone went on an alcoholic bender, committed an offence and then had no recollection of it. Clearly our national drug policy fails to prevent or perhaps even minimise the likelihood of these sorts of sad events happening because people who may have problems with illegal substances may often avoid stepping up for treatment because of fear of legal consequences, and public funds that may better be spent on treatment options go towards targeting all illegal drug users whether they have a problem with the use of their choice of drugs or not. While the use of smokable meth may increase the likelihood of negative outcomes for people who like amphetamines the policy of strict prohibition may not be doing them or other members of our community associated with them any favours either. People with problems need assistance, not misinformed condemnation, or legal consequences that alienate them from the community they are members of and potentially make us all a little more likely to be victims of some apparently random crime or stray bullet. People interested in an alternative should investigate the Widnes drug trial conducted by Dr John Marks, UK 1985-1990.

27 Jan 2009 11:43a.m.

Sharee wrote:

P is not a excuse but it does come into play had McDonald not been on P this would not have occured and innocent people would not have been hurt. I'm sure McDonald has family that don't condone his actions but are there for support, none of the events that took place that day including the Police shooting was not malicious or done intentionally. McDonald just now needs to stand up and take responsibility as he is doing hence the no application for bail etc

26 Jan 2009 08:57p.m.

jarrod wrote:

p is part of this country and its not because
of the people so u dont like it leave our
country he is just a dumb ass that got in to it
so b4 u go being a high school techer by comeing up bloody p head stop and think

26 Jan 2009 06:08p.m.

tolduso wrote:

Bloody P-Head