• Full Story

Allied Farmers vote in favour of Hanover merger

Print

Tue, 08 Dec 2009 1:48p.m.

Allied Farmers Managing Director Rob Alloway, left, and Chairman John Laughlin (filepic)

Allied Farmers Managing Director Rob Alloway, left, and Chairman John Laughlin (filepic)

Over 90 percent of Allied Farmers shareholders have voted in favour of a takeover of failed finance company Hanover.
 
The deal involves Allied Farmers taking over all of Hanover's remaining assets valued at $396m.

The takeover would put Allied in the NZX top 50 - and see Hanover investors swap their debt for shares - with the possibility of getting around 78 cents for every dollar owed.
 
The ratio would be determined by the volume weighted average price over the five trading days leading up to the deal's completion.

Shareholders Association chairman Bruce Sheppard previously said the proposal would be great for Allied but extremely bad for Hanover and United investors.

"It will be a great deal for Allied. It will effectively fill up their balance sheet with over-valued assets that will generate some cash and restore their solvency".
 
"It will also be a great deal for (Hanover owners) Eric Watson and Mark Hotchin. They will have all of Hanover's debts taken out of the Hanover balance sheet, thus relieving them of any obligations to put the $20m in," said Sheppard.
 
The deal also needs the approval of 75 percent of investors in Hanover  - that vote is on December 16.

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

08 Dec 2009 05:15p.m.

simon wrote:

Quite quite bizarre, Allied, a company which had no future and little expertise in commercial loans has taken over another failed companies liablities, Hotchin will not believe his luck, $20m less he has to front up with.

Allied shares will be worthless for years, the best investors can hope for now is 1-2 cents in the dollar for years and years.

What should have happened with Hanover from day one is receivership where assets could have been sold in an orderly manner by people with no other vested interests.

Then the investors may get 30 cents back in the dollar in their lifetime, not on the never never which is exactly what they have voted for.

I am sorry that the investors have been in denial hoping for a better day but now they have just voted for la la land.