3News » Home

An apple a day

Wed, 21 Apr 2010 2:54p.m.

By Abby Ward

While fulfilling the unpaid and rather monotonous family duty of apple picking this morning, I spent much of my time discarding perfectly edible fruit onto the grass. These braeburn displayed one of my father’s exhaustive examples of ‘flaws’. An unattractive shape, an orange patch or a large size were justifications for throwing out half of this year’s crop. Why? Just as botox and boob jobs are soaring in popularity, our food is also becoming increasingly dependent on looks.

As millions starve in the poorest nations, much of our produce is simply rotting due to our superficial values. And this is just in the primary stages. The aesthetically approved apples may still end up in the annual 70 kg, or one third of edible food waste which is thrown away in the household, according to a 2008 UK study. US research last year found that the average American disposed of 1400 calories every day, the equivalent of 70 percent of a person’s daily nutrition needs. While we westerners pack on the pounds and turn our noses up at anything vaguely unattractive, one billion others are less fortunate, and definitely less fussy. 

In terms of climate change, the wasted food makes up a substantial part of a person’s carbon footprint. The production of 1kg meat, for example, produces more CO2 than leaving your lights on and taking a three hour drive.

This ongoing humanitarian and environmental crisis is frequently described by Western governments as near impossible to solve. However, the world produces enough food for seven billion. Apples remain unpicked on trees. Yoghurt sits in the fridge until past its use-by-date.

For the individual, cutting down on food waste will significantly reduce your carbon emissions and grocery bill. As for national change – rather than focussing on short-term wealth creation projects that have the potential to devastate our environment, we could instead concentrate on ensuring that we first use all we have effectively, co-operating with other nations to re-evaluate and redistribute our food production. 

 

The UNICEF Climate Kiwis are five young New Zealanders committed to working on the issue of climate change.

 

Erana Walker, Rick Zwaan, Phoebe Hunt, Travis Mills and Abby Ward were selected by UNICEF in partnership with Enviro-challenge to represent New Zealand at the UNICEF Children’s Climate Forum in Copenhagen in 2009.

 

They returned determined to address the issue of climate change and prepare for the COP16 in Mexico this December.

 

Each week a different Climate Kiwi shares their thoughts and experiences here. 

 

Comments [6]

V
16 May 2010 08:08p.m.

You confuse food production with political naivety. The Global Warming political con game will indeed see the third world condemned to eternal poverty as long as the power brokers of the world con everyone with Carbon Tax scams, Yes we could feed the world with one stroke of a pen but what profit could be made compared to selling weapons of war.

Alex
28 Apr 2010 06:53p.m.

Abby is right. Her writing style and knowledge of how the world works is superior to a whole hell of a lot of people who comment on this site. Stephen is a dingleberry.

Sue
23 Apr 2010 03:27p.m.

Great peioce of writing Abbie, passionate but considered. Keep it up.
Sue

Abby
22 Apr 2010 05:05p.m.

Hi Stephen

While you may see my article as 'superficial', I am simply pointing out the gross amount of waste which is both endorsed by the state (via wasteage in apple crops etc.) and by us, as consumers and showing the effects this has on the third world. While we westerners may see ourselves as 'charitably' helping the poor in the global south through donations, the structure of society and continuance of consumer attitudes continue to reinforce inequalities.

James Murray
22 Apr 2010 03:47p.m.

Hi Stephen

I personally think that Abby has produced a well formed opinion here based on some research. I personally am proud to give these young people a chance to express their views on a mainstream news site. This piece may not be an in depth study but it has not set out to be - it is, in my opinion, a considered opinion, well written and superior to a lot of writing done by people considerably older than Abby.
I have to say I am surprised at the arrogance of your comment - young people like Abby should be encouraged to develop their writing and ideas and do not need unfounded comments denigrating their work. I would suggest that some constructive criticism or possible some questions that may have widened the debate would have been more useful and appropriate as a comment.
Cheers
James Murray - Chief Editor 3news.co.nz

Stephen
22 Apr 2010 01:12p.m.

What a superficial article. About the level I would expect from someone in their early teens.

Post a comment

Name:
Email: (Won't be published)
Comment:


3News Video 3News Audio

Blogs