Angry protesters hunt John Key at National conference

Print

Sun, 18 Jul 2010 6:05p.m.

Protesters stormed into Sky City in an attempt to disrupt the National Party conference (NZPA)

Protesters stormed into Sky City in an attempt to disrupt the National Party conference (NZPA)

By Patrick Gower

Union protesters clashed with police at the National Party conference today as they repeatedly tried to force their way into Sky City – and the protest had some old faces with new motivation.

The unions told John Key they were going to come after him – and they did.

They wanted to fight back against his workplace changes and ended up fighting their way past Sky City security. 

But they had gone into the wrong part of the hotel and instead of fighting back they were turned back.

It was the police who were standing up at the conference door and they were facing off against a familiar face – Sue Bradford.

“This attack is as bad as what happened in the early 1990s when I was on the streets of Auckland – I’m back here,” she said.

On the street the call was one step forward and while it was often two steps backwards – the union message was clear.

“There's going to be a fight, he's declared it, this is the start and this will go on and on and on until John Key sees sense and backs off because these workers aren't going to take it anymore,” said Matt McCarten of Unite Union.

But it wasn't workers out today – it was mainly hardcore protesters; the unions say they are not overreacting, but have genuine fears.

“They just drive the employment relationship to the low road; the employer dominant – no good faith, no trust and we just think they are totally unnecessary,” says Council of Trade Unions rep Helen Kelly.

“They will not have the ability to get a better pay rate; they will not have the ability to defend themselves from an unfair dismissal,” says Maxine Gay of the National Distribution Union.

The protesters never got through to Mr Key but the arguments will go on, and one thing is certain: the war between the unions and National is back on again.

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

20 Jul 2010 01:47p.m.

MUFFIN wrote:

Mary It's not about just taking sickles It's about employee rights and being taking for an unfair ride by employers. Being paid low wages over the probation period, being dismissed unfairly, Having that risk of trading up to another job, Being put in another job in the same company so you can be dismissed. Basically we already have rules in place e.g.. written and oral warnings that have worked so far to my knowledge and there is no need. All this puts workers at an unfair disadvantage.

19 Jul 2010 08:14p.m.

Mary wrote:

I agree with Frank. If Sue Bradford is against it, it must be very good for N.Z. If you are an honest worker and don't take sickies, which is effectively stealing, then you have nothing at all to fear. Full-time stirrers are just trying, as usual,to make trouble.Several of the postings here are almost hysterical, completely devoid of any logic,or intelligence. How about some strictly honest well constucted postings. Most of those appearing here are a written condemnation of our education system too-which is yet another employment issue. THINK.

19 Jul 2010 12:45p.m.

Muffin wrote:

I believe in human rights!!! I believe in unions!!!! I believe in freedom of speech!!!! I believe in employee rights!!! Good on you protesters we should all protect our rights and not let them get taken from us!!! If you disagree with this may be I should put in a language you'll understand BAA BAAA BA BAAA BA BA.

19 Jul 2010 08:22a.m.

Lightseed wrote:

Justin, the answer lays in if you watch previous footage you will find a large number of the protesters are those who turn up and protest at anything and everything.

19 Jul 2010 06:43a.m.

Pitball wrote:

I've been critical of Sue Bradford but never violent as seen by Government force on TV. Her head was severely bent forward as can be seen in slow playback. Think of the legal payout she will get.

19 Jul 2010 01:55a.m.

Jan.. wrote:

Mr.Key, to stop interfairing with the union and it workers policy..
What are you really up to Mr. Key? Just look at our country since you were elected, more road death tolls, crimes rates to guns, demanding more new prison, you could have avoid building more crime holes and look at the prospect in lessen the crime to zero.. My Key is making too many bad moves..He could be the leader for the terrorist and pretend that he cares..

18 Jul 2010 10:49p.m.

Mojo wrote:

The media is a whore..Just like John Don-key Cant help but mock the people aye..Making light of a subject that concerns the real people of Aotearoa. They are a voice and you the "media" are like a gossip mag..WEAK. I agree the writer of this is a sellout

18 Jul 2010 10:03p.m.

Mike wrote:

It's a shame that more people didn't turn out. The erosion of rights in the work place affects many of us. It is important for people to understand that this protest wasn't about pay increases (miserable though the minimum wage is) but was primarily about fighting unfair dismissal... about retaining the right to union representation. These changes tip the balance unfairly in favour of the employer and against employees (particularly the young and vulnerable). The National Government are eroding fundamental rights and exacerbating inequality. Wake up New Zealand! You are lucky to have Sue Bradford fighting for your rights.

18 Jul 2010 08:54p.m.

Dan wrote:

@ Katrina.. the word you're looking for is drivel I believe. I found John Key's arguments lacked logic when he stated that extending the 90 day trial to big business will give Kiwis greater opportunity for employment. Using the "success" of the 90 day trial with small business as a direct comparison makes no sense whatsoever because, unlike small business, the implications of hiring a few unproductive workers are negligible for big business. When a business employing less than 20 staff makes a mistake and hires a couple of unproductive workers that they can't get rid of without good cause, this seriously affects their productivity. But with big business a few mistakes will have no noticeable impact on their performance. For example do you think McDonalds is going to be hit hard by a couple of lazy fry cooks? There is no good cause to extend the 90 day trial period to big business and I'm disappointed that John Key has chosen to mislead the people of New Zealand.

18 Jul 2010 08:07p.m.

katrina wrote:

What a load of poppy co..k. People don't apply for pay increases in the first three months anyway. This sounds like a load of over emotional over dramatised dribble.