Animal cruelty sentence has not deterred killer

Print

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 7:31p.m.

Lance Crequer has spent time in jail for killing five dogs, and says he would do it again

Lance Crequer has spent time in jail for killing five dogs, and says he would do it again

Harsher prison sentences for New Zealand’s worst animal abusers will move one step closer on Thursday, when a new bill gets its first reading in Parliament.

Jail time will almost double – but some say it is still not enough.

Lance Crequer has spent time in jail for killing five dogs, and says he would do it again.

“I put the dogs in the boot of the car, and I took them to a bridge, and I threw them off the bridge,” he says.

“This woman came over the hill and saw me. I dropped the dogs, shut the boot, and left.”

Three of the puppies swept to their deaths down a 20 metre waterfall. Another two had to be put down.

Crequer pleaded guilty to wilful ill-treatment when he appeared at the Manukau District Court. He sought home detention.

Judge Anna Johnson took the rare move of imprisonment.

“Your actions were appalling, to say the least,” said Ms Johnson when she handed down her sentence.

“The animals must have suffered greatly before their death. You are convicted and sentenced to four months imprisonment, and you are disqualified from owning for a period of five years.”

That was 20 months ago. Today, Crequer doesn’t have any pets, but says he does have an excuse for what he did - he says he went to the SPCA for help, but they let him down.

“It was going to cost us so much to have these dogs fixed or dealt with or whatever, which we couldn’t afford” he says.
 
“Eventually I became so frustrated with not getting help from an organisation who are supposed to help us.”

Crequer says he decided he would “do it” himself.

The SPCA says his excuse is feeble.

“We do accept all animals, anybody that can’t look after them any longer we accept them,” says Auckland SPCA chief exectuive Bob Kerridge.

“We do ask for a donation. Sometimes we get it, sometimes we don’t. But we certainly don’t reject them,” says Mr Kerridge.

Mr Kerridge says for a crime like Crequer’s, he would like to see sentences of at least two years.

“That would send a message.”

The Government will introduce a bill to Parliament later this week, which will increase maximum sentences for animal cruelty from three to five years. It is a bill that has widespread party support.

The new legislation follows a number of recent horrific incidents, including the slaughter of 33 dogs near Wellsford, and the man who fed five kittens to his pitbull terrier.

Animal cruelty can lead to much more serious offending – murderer Antonie Dixon a case in point.

“His background was examined very carefully from a whole range of psychiatrists, from both defence and the Crown – the common element which all agreed was significant in the development of his personality and what he later did was cruelty to animals when he was a child,” said Crown prosecutor Simon Moore, following the trial.

Crequer says he regrets what he did, in that he had to go to jail and put his wife through hell. However he feels no remorse for what he did.

When asked what he would do if faced with the same situation again, Crequer says; “I’d buy myself a hammer, or a bullet, and put a bullet in them”.

Auckland SPCA CEO Bob Kerridge says attitudes like that show the Government’s new bill is too soft. Five years is not enough, he says - 10 years is the appropriate maximum sentence.

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

23 Aug 2010 01:09p.m.

rangi wrote:

what a lot of crack-in the first place you should not have dogs if you can not afford to left after them-I have work with lot of dogs on stock farms,have a lot of repect with them-being a hunter have had a quite few dogs be very loyal and faithfull. here a question mr.crequer do you work and my other answer is this-you might be best to check up with your local doctor now and then just to make sure your brain is operating okay

22 Jun 2010 09:39p.m.

Rick wrote:

LMAO whats owning a pet got to do with starving children. and its a matter of opinion to which is more important. humans polute the earth so why are we more important. plus humans are animals dingdongs

19 Apr 2010 08:40a.m.

Litutu wrote:

Davo, third world country is more intellegent than you. The anger that is inside you is killing you slowly. Have you watch the program THE NATIVES when they were in England. This is a comment from their leader when he saw homeless people on the street, These people feed the animals (pets) but they cant feed their own people. Brenda is right, people are more important that those animals.

01 Apr 2010 06:19p.m.

Brendan wrote:

All you animal and pet activists should be absolutely ashamed you selfish and callous people.
NOBODY should have a pet while there is still a single child starving to death on this planet.
You people take the soft option of moaning about animal cruelty etc.
What about the starving children ?

30 Mar 2010 08:31p.m.

Davo wrote:

Litutu go back to your third world island or wherever your from and stay there.This is a civilised country and you dont belong here.

23 Feb 2010 10:01p.m.

Litutu wrote:

All you animal lovers are full of anger. You are worse than the person who threw the dogs in the river. Any person who wants to get rid of their pet dogs. Bring them to me, Ill make a good feed out of them. They are the same as sheep, cattles etc. that we slaughter for consumtion. So get over it. Are we going to send the butchers to prison too. They killl animals nearly every day. They are murderers.

23 Feb 2010 08:48p.m.

easy goin' wrote:

To andrea - we got to think outside the square. I have another idea. All these animal crulty sicko's should be made to do supervised community service with the SPCA to get a different idea about animal care, even if it means putting down the strays. What do you all think?

22 Feb 2010 09:12a.m.

Andrea wrote:

easy goin If beneficiaries need a purpose to life Get a job!! and stop expecting people like myself to pay for them. It is bad ebnough wee pay for their kids etc let alone their animals also. Their kids are causing most problems due to family breakdown so why would their pets be any different. Stop smoking weed and get a job.

20 Feb 2010 12:12p.m.

eddie wrote:

@ Animal lover

don't talk sh*t, if he couldn't afford to feed his kids...he'd just throw them off a bridge too?

don't make excuses....your uncle deserved a cpl of years, not 4 mths! guys a d*ck!!!

19 Feb 2010 07:29a.m.

Alex wrote:

This guy should have received greater than four months imprisonment. Even a year at least wouldn't be sufficient enough for the killing of five animals. He's trying to blame the SPCA, but in reality it's his fault. He should never have owned the dogs in the first place when he couldn't afford to look after them. And instead of drowning the dogs, he could have sought homes for them by simply putting up a cheap ad somewhere. I sure hope he never owns an animal again, not even after the five year ban elapses.