• Full Story

Archives merger 'dangerous' to democracy

Print

Fri, 26 Mar 2010 5:31a.m.

Some historians were concerned the merger could lead to political interference at Archives NZ (file pic)

Some historians were concerned the merger could lead to political interference at Archives NZ (file pic)

By Matthew Backhouse

Merging Archives New Zealand and the National Library with the Department of Internal Affairs would be "dangerous and unsound", historians say.

The Government announced the merger yesterday as part of its shake-up of state services, saying it would save between $3 million and $9 million and cost about $2.5m to set up in the first year.

Jobs across both bodies would be cut by 15.

The merger has worried some archivists and historians, who say the move could have potentially dangerous implications for the democratic process.

It has also sparked criticism online, with a group opposed to the merger attracting more than 600 members on the social networking website Facebook.

New Zealand Historical Association president Catharine Coleborne said historians were concerned the merger could lead to political interference at Archives NZ, which is the agency tasked with collecting government and community records

It became an independent body in 2000 after it was spun off from the Department of Internal Affairs, and reintegrating it would be a backward step, Dr Coleborne said.

"We're very uncomfortable about the threat that this could mean for the autonomy of national archives, and also of the Chief Archivist's role within Government," she told NZPA.

"To just create a new ruling that merges these institutions is very dangerous and unsound without the opportunity for comment and consultation.

"What we would really like is for a period of appropriate consultation."

The merger would make it harder for academics and members of the public to access records, she said.

"The danger is that those activities will actually become subject to more government scrutiny, and once that happens, you find that access to certain kinds of records becomes more difficult," she said.

"These kinds of materials need to be collected and kept for the posterity of the nation, rather than being subject to possible interventions."

The Archives and Records Association and the Library and Information Association have also expressed concern over the merger.

State Services Minister Tony Ryall said the state service mergers announced today would future-proof agencies during a time of increased restraint and rising public expectations of service delivery.

"Some agencies are going to need to work differently within their existing baselines to meet those expectations."

A Cabinet paper released today said independent bodies were not needed to retain independence, an opinion backed by Crown Law advice.

The risks of losing specialist staff could be reduced through "good change management" and communication, the paper said.

NZPA

 

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

01 Apr 2010 08:53a.m.

Damien wrote:

http://archivesireland.wordpress.com/ Archives merger 'dangerous' to democracy This is a headline, not from the Irish Times or the Irish Independent but from 3 News, a news station in New Zealand. It refers to the proposed merger of the New Zealand National Archives and the National Library. Sound familiar. Financial savings and consolidation of staffing are given as reasons for the merger in New Zealand. What is similar in Ireland and New Zealand is what the New Zealand Historical Association president Catharine Coleborne commented on: “to just create a new ruling that merges these institutions is very dangerous and unsound without the opportunity for comment and consultation. What we would really like is for a period of appropriate consultation.” This has not happened in Ireland. The National Archives Advisory Council has yet to be reconvened by the present government (there are no plans to) and the low priority of successive governments towards archives in Ireland doesn't bode well for the future. Archives And Library Merger Does Not Stack Up Grant Robertson, the State Services Spokesperson for New Zealand Labour Party refutes claims that financial savings can be made: “on purely financial grounds these mergers just do not stack up. In addition the disruption and upheaval caused by jobs losses and reduction in productivity will cost even more.” “The Cabinet paper actually says that Archives New Zealand and the National Library are “well regarded and successful institutions”. It defies belief that the government would disrupt the work of such agencies for savings less than the salary of a Cabinet Minister.” Can this be said of the National Archives of Ireland – ‘well regarded and successful’ or head above water?

26 Mar 2010 07:54p.m.

Helen1 wrote:

Lightseed use my lenses and have a good look at whats happening around NZ and the business reviews on your computer, National will merger all the assets to save money and sell all its left over depts-(which includes assets with legal binding legislation) and then squander the profits on idealistic stuff (to show face with the big boys) that has no benefit to our country whatsoever. Democracy and freedom is when the monetary system is null and void and all peoples are equal and free to mend the present for the betterment of mankind. Wake up kiwi this is 2010! There is no future it is now that really exists.

26 Mar 2010 01:51p.m.

Lightseed wrote:

christian I dont know what country you live in, it's not NZ because National have sold off no assets. I'd say it's more that you know nothing of freedom, coming in and having a panty fit because the government people elected is not doing what you think it should.

26 Mar 2010 01:35p.m.

Helen1 wrote:

Hear! hear! Christian! spoken by a true kiwi and at long last New Zealand the truth be knowm.

26 Mar 2010 12:09p.m.

Kevin Ward wrote:

You are on to it Christian

26 Mar 2010 08:01a.m.

Christian wrote:

Havent they realised yet, Key isnt running a democracy.

He is running a company and selling it one asset at a time.

Dairy herds to china

Gold Nuggets everywhere else.

John Key is not about protecting New Zealand and its rights, and he never will be.

His sole purpose as a wallstreet investment banker was to disect companies, merge them, make them profitable,

He knows nothing about democracy or freedom.

And that is how the country is currently being run into the ground.