Asset sales legislation 'a victory' - Sharples

Print

Thu, 23 Feb 2012 6:06p.m.

The treaty obligations will apply to the Crown only

The treaty obligations will apply to the Crown only

By Political Editor Duncan Garner

The Maori Party's threat to walk out of Government over a proposal to ditch a clause protecting Maori rights in law has been resolved.

The Government says it will keep a version of Section 9 in the asset sales legislation, meaning Maori will continued to be consulted on major decisions.

Bill English said today that National has “indicated that [Maori] rights and interests will be protected” in asset sales legislation.

Maori Party co-leader Pita Sharples says the move is “a victory for the Maori Party”.

The Government had considered dropping Section 9 from the law governing the power companies that will be partially sold.

Section 9 is a “general clause requiring that the Crown does not act in a manner that is inconsistent with the principles of the Treaty Of Waitangi" – a clause which is hugely important to Maori, and means they will be consulted on future decisions.

Mr English says Maori are “pretty keen about water quality… and they want to make sure a sale doesn't stop them having a say”.

The treaty obligations will apply to the Crown only, not the private investors buying shares.

Dr Sharples says the threat to leave Government over the issue was not an empty one, and is “still there”.

National says the clause provides certainty for investors and Maori, and Mr English denies the party is backing down.

Maori have a claim in for ownership of the water the power companies use, and Dr Sharples is encouraging iwi to pursue this. 

However, Mr English says the water is “not for sale - it's not owned by anybody”.

Watch the video for more.

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

08 May 2012 06:47p.m.

rgkingi@live.com wrote:

why does the govnmnt claim to have the right to sell off assets that clearly belong to aotearoa, they proved this when john keys only solution for the fore shore and seabed was to give all nz's ownership to the foreshore but not the sea bed ,so typical of the govnmnt to sell off things that dont belong to them like our children's future right of ownership or guardianship of our land, the way honkeys and his roman mate's are going there wont be anything to own or guard. thanks to all the blood suckers that are hanging around nationals arse how can you moari mp's allow honkeys to sell our mother papatuanuku. you's all need to take your shoes off and work around on the whenua and feel papa she's always here for us

24 Feb 2012 02:45p.m.

QuickAnswers wrote:

@brian We already own these assets... Read your own comments how nonsensical can you get? You are advocating selling something we own to ourselves again? Quote:'...us - as stakeholders... to buy into OUR Companies... Yes, OUR assets APPEAR to be being sold off... Surely us, for sure...' Do I laugh or cry?

24 Feb 2012 01:14p.m.

brian wrote:

I read the article, and carefully read all the comments made - up to now that is - and have the only conclusion that makes sense: Get politics and the unimportance of the minor parties OUT OF THIS. Let's look ONLY at what is best for ALL OF US, not just the "most vocal" wanting - yet another - "full and final" settlement? Or a leg in the door to "argue" for yet another "full and final" settlement, Ad Nausium. I think even our Govt. has finally realised "the petty bureaucracy" CAN'T "RUN" anything efficiently. Time for all of us - as stakeholders - to have the ability to buy into OUR Companies that will "OWN OUR ASSETS" and run them as "viable" assets properly rather than by the bureaucratic incompetents who "appear" to work 9 to 5 but achieve nothing. Yes, OUR assets APPEAR to be being sold off, but to whom? Surely us, for sure. And whom will "run" these in the most efficient way possible? We will and NEVER THE PETTY BUREAUCRACY who couldn't even run a school tuck shop.

24 Feb 2012 12:11p.m.

Gary wrote:

A victory perhaps for self interest over the country's interests. This serves to emphasise the divide between Maori and the "strangers" (pakeha) who will never apparently "belong".

24 Feb 2012 11:15a.m.

cherie wrote:

I just love all the cloak and dagger stuff. Some of you need to get a life. I think this is a win for the maori party. Certainly the Mana party had no part in it. Well done Mr Sharples.This is MMP at work that so many in this country voted to keep. And dont forget it is partial sales. Yes partial that to you lot who clearly dont understand means "not all of it".

24 Feb 2012 11:08a.m.

Kepa wrote:

The Maori Party should rename themselves the Kupapa Party. The ideology of this government is strongly anti-Maori, through policies like the cuts to TPK and the scapegoating of beneficiaries etc, and the proposed asset sales are consistant to this ideology.

24 Feb 2012 10:15a.m.

johnmillan wrote:

Looks like more money being donated too the Maori party leaders.This is not what the Maori want?This is too feather their own nests,sooner they leave the Maori Party the better,those who are getting treated like pig shit are those without proper living standards are being getting crapped on.by their leaders.

24 Feb 2012 09:33a.m.

dova wrote:

man these people are corrupt arnt they what a rotten sordid corrupt little government is national and the Maori party . nothing but corruption .

23 Feb 2012 11:36p.m.

Fellowes wrote:

Pita Sharples should hang his head in shame, enabling Key to sell his country to the highest bidder.

23 Feb 2012 11:00p.m.

QuickAnswers wrote:

So... asset sales will still go ahead, there will just be a consultation fee paid to the Maori traitors who jump into bed with the 'Kiwi' traitors? Why yes, this is how we steal sovereignty nowadays, under the banner of economic civility don't ya know.