• Full Story

Atkins family speak out about Gundry aquittal

Print

Sun, 25 Oct 2009 1:05p.m.

Photographers were set upon by angry Atkins supporters after Alan Gundry was found not guilty of murder or manslaughter (NZPA)

Photographers were set upon by angry Atkins supporters after Alan Gundry was found not guilty of murder or manslaughter (NZPA)

The mother of an Auckland man shot dead by his friend with a pig-hunting rifle does not believe in justice following a jury's not guilty verdict this week.

Alan Gundry shot Gene Atkins at Mr Gundry's home in Orewa, north of Auckland, on January 12. Mr Atkins, 28, was looking for his partner, Sarah Jane Dean, with whom he had been fighting earlier that night.

Mr Atkins had been drinking heavily and the High Court at Auckland was told five people saw his aggression at a dinner party that evening which had gone badly wrong.

Mr Gundry, 30, pleaded not guilty to murder, saying the shots were fired in self-defence.

A jury found Mr Gundry not guilty of murder and manslaughter this week.

But Mr Atkins' mother, Libby Tebbs, has condemned his acquittal.

"There is no justice," she told the Herald on Sunday.

"The verdict was based on emotion and not fact -- how could anyone shoot someone twice and get away with it?"

Ms Tebbs said she was still grieving for her son.

"I am gutted," she said.

"I have lived and breathed this for nine months, and I will do for the rest of my life."

Ms Tebbs' husband, Ross, said she had suffered nightmares, and none of the family had received support, as victims.

Mr Atkins' girlfriend, Ms Dean, would never forgive Mr Gundry, he added.

"She doesn't want to talk to him or know him ever. We feel the same way," he told the newspaper.

Mr Tebbs accepted his stepson and Ms Dean had previously had "a few blows", after which she would threaten to leave, and he also acknowledged that Mr Atkins had used cannabis.

However, Mr Atkins had looked to Alan Gundry as a mentor who was good at calming him down when he felt out of sorts.

"That night, we acknowledge he was out of line," Mr Tebbs told the newspaper.

"But Alan Gundry shot and killed him and walked out of court a free man."

NZPA

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

19 Dec 2011 08:53a.m.

Kat wrote:

Gene was no angel Im sure, but he was still somesones son. Tragic event but with his record he may have moved on to more serious crime himself. Respect to both familes and remember it is xmas soon.

08 Nov 2010 10:33p.m.

In shock wrote:

I am totally in shock that 3 News would allow people to slander others on their website. Shame on you. You ought to remove this crap. That this is still sitting here a year later - is absolutely crazy. I think that a reputable television station should not be giving the public a vehicle to publish their unfounded ideas.

09 Nov 2009 08:39p.m.

To Daniel S wrote:

Excuse me.....NO ONE lost an eye!!! And why would anyone lower themselves to Shelly and her totally fabricated comments. Maybe it's Shelly doing the cheating!!!!!! There sure isn't any truth in the rumours she is trying to spread......far from it!!!! No one is glorifying Gene, just trying to deal with grief, loss and the fact that he is dead and the family/friends will never had another birthday, Xmas, or anything to share with a son, brother, cousin, uncle, nephew, grandson, and mate. All that they have is a grave to visit on birthdays and xmas. Show some respect to the families, please.

09 Nov 2009 06:48p.m.

Daniel. S. wrote:

Well Shelley - maybe it was a bit harsh to say that. However I notice that no one has said it is not true!!! This sure makes for interesting reading. I have to agree with "artful dodger" - Mr Gundry did do the world a favour. And why is no one mentioning the young NZ Olympic hopeful who Gene caused to lose his eye?? Seems to me this is all a bit one sided - don't glorify someone just because they have passed away - view them as they were - and in this case its not a pretty picture.

06 Nov 2009 03:00a.m.

artful dodger wrote:

being a lawyer & having read all the files on this case.....Gundry did the world a favour!!! Ms Dean could have prevented all of this & so could you ma & pa tebbs ...........too rapted up in yourselves im picking,
shame on you

29 Oct 2009 10:04p.m.

Glenys wrote:

Shelly....what a horrible person you are! How dare you speak of Gene's mother like that. She is a mother who has lost a son!!! What she is going through, she would not wish on anyone. Leave her alone, she is an innocent victim and deserves respect.

27 Oct 2009 06:09p.m.

Disgusted wrote:

Shelly....what would motivate you to write such hideous remarks about Genes parents. These people have lost their much loved son. What is wrong with you. Absolutely disgusting...shame on you

26 Oct 2009 10:43p.m.

Shelly wrote:

Of course Libby believes that justice wasnt served with this verdict - however she wasnt too concerned about Gene when she left his father and left Gene with him - the apple never falls far from the tree as they say. As far as the nightmares are concerned she would only be having them because she is worried her current husband will catch her cheating.

26 Oct 2009 02:29p.m.

Jeanine wrote:

It's so easy to see people as saints once there dead, but the jury heard ALL the evidence, so that should tell us that it really was self defense, people seem to forget that there were little girls there that night, they are now victims aswell, they witnessed that whole event also, very nice start in life for them. What would have Gene's family done in the same situation, nothing?, I don't think so.

25 Oct 2009 11:11p.m.

Andrew wrote:

From what I can gather about this case it has nothing whatsoever to do about sentencing Cassidy, hence the Trust’s silence. To pass comment would hardly be appropriate. This was a trial verdict and the verdict of a jury to boot. In this case the jury chose to acquit. End of story.