• Full Story

Auckland Council says cost of fliers was justified

Print

Fri, 29 Jul 2011 9:29a.m. UPDATED 11:00AM

The flier’s content included a message from Mr Brown (file)

The flier’s content included a message from Mr Brown (file)

The Auckland Council has today acknowledged the cost of flyers sent to ratepayers from mayor Len Brown was $175,000 more than initially reported. 

Around 500,000 copies of the flyer were sent out to Auckland ratepayers, even though one of Mr Brown’s senior advisors voiced concerns about the campaign, believing there were cheaper ways to get their message across. 

The flyers were part of a campaign explaining Auckland's new rating system.

An NZ Herald Official Information Act request revealed council emails which stated the initial estimated cost of the flyers as being  $200,000 –  today the council have announced the final cost of the fliers was actually $376,774. 

The emails show several council representatives saying the scheme is a good idea. However, Papakura District Council Chief Executive Theresa Stratton described it as "quite an expensive exercise".

She thought it would be cheaper to send the flyers out in the first rates mailout next month.

"Is there a reason why this is not contemplated? My experience is that stuff included in the rates notice envelope is much more likely to be received than a generic flyer (even if it is addressed)," Ms Stratton said.

3 News made contact with the council who have provided background information as to how the discrepancy between the two figures occurred. 

The $200,000 figure was mentioned in an email from March and was an estimated cost. It was part of an overall budget for the campaign of $500,000.

The Herald says it sought an explanation from the council yesterday and a breakdown of the flyer’s large bill, but the mayor’s office refused.

NZ Herald journalist Bernard Orsman approached the council early yesterday morning with questions regarding the flyers, but they did not have the requested information, including the final cost of the fliers, on hand at the time.

The flyer’s content included a message from Mr Brown on the council’s cost-cutting measures, which have helped keep rates from rising steeply. 

In the background information provided to 3 News it is argued the cost was justified as it was relatively small when divided by the number of ratepayers and the information provided was similar to the information a power company would provide customers if their prices changed.

Local Government Minister Rodney Hide says this is an "operational matter and should be left with the council and the mayor".

WhaleOil blogger Cameron Slater has blasted the mayor’s office, saying ‘lying by ommis­sion is still lying’.

3 News

 

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

29 Jul 2011 06:32p.m.

jabba wrote:

Lenny B .. what a con artist. All those who failed to see through him and his mates should be ashamed

29 Jul 2011 06:23p.m.

erm... wrote:

Next time they could save money by delivering the cards straight to the recycling station.

29 Jul 2011 03:40p.m.

Ricardo wrote:

Just remember - Len Brown wasn't voted in, Banks was voted out. That's how NZ voting works. Len Brown has a lot of growing up to do if he thinks he will win again. There is a lot he got away with in South Auckland which doesn't wash in a real city - he now has voters with brains to deal with.

29 Jul 2011 03:18p.m.

Jimmy J wrote:

More than happy with living in auckland. Browns doing a good job. The city is looking a picture. Lowest rates in NZ.
Great place to live. Try CHCH or Hamilton or Blenheim

29 Jul 2011 01:37p.m.

cherryjeary wrote:

Chris, your political allegiance is blinding you. The credit card non-issue was just used by a couple of councilors to increase their profile. Mayor Brown had already disclosed and payed back the items before the media was used as a direct line of communication on a technical rule breaking on personal use of a few hundred dollars. You would do better to concentrate on the big stuff, regardless of who's in which ever political party.

29 Jul 2011 12:50p.m.

Alien wrote:

continues his path he was on before being Auckland Mayor of ripping rate payers off.

29 Jul 2011 11:40a.m.

Chris wrote:

Who the fk is Len Brown, ive never heard of him and what is this super city thing you speak of, oh thats right... what difference has it made?

29 Jul 2011 10:38a.m.

Chris wrote:

Typical left leaning socialist - corrupt to the core.
People who voted for this lieing idiot deserve what they get. People forgot he lied abour his credit card expenses and other corrupt council spending in Manukau City prior to him being elected 'super major'. He showed no accountability and lied about it. He has a hightened sense of entitlement like all good socialists do.
Another good reason never to let the socalist into power. Vote Labour or the Greens for corruption, mismanagement, manipulation and lies.

29 Jul 2011 10:18a.m.

James wrote:

Another example of how the people of Auckland were sucked in by this mayor who is way out of his depth. Have people forgotten his self applied face slapping when questioned and under pressure, is he stable ? Will we see a repeat? What about his refusal to explain a large expense claim while Mayor of Manukau. Open & transparent administration , yeh right. The sooner we get rid of this loser and get an effective honest mayor, the better

29 Jul 2011 10:09a.m.

Mouthguard wrote:

Anyone still pleased they vote for this guy?