3News » Home
Full Story

Auckland SPCA to destroy catch-a-cray games

16 comments | Post Comment email Email printer friendly Print    Text Size:
aA
aA
aA
The catch-a-cray game has been the subject of intense investigation by the SPCA

The catch-a-cray game has been the subject of intense investigation by the SPCA

Tue, 09 Feb 2010 7:03p.m.

Auckland pub managers are being warned to co-operate as SPCA inspectors close down an arcade game involving live crayfish.

The SPCA announced plans to close down several ‘Catch-A-Cray’ games in pubs in Auckland, where patrons pay $3 to attempt to capture live crayfish from a water-tank using a metal claw.

Animal rights group SAFE staged a protest outside The Albion pub yesterday, saying the game caused the crayfish stress.

Since their introduction last year seven bars have chosen to get rid of the machines. It is understood 15 bars across the country have opted to keep them.

The SPCA said it would visit Auckland pubs running the game and would make the games inoperable. The Albion hotel manager Andrew Jackson said the pub had not yet had a visit from the SPCA.

He said the crayfish were not being abused, and the machines would not be shut down.

It was the same as picking one out of a tank at a sea food market where there were “200 crammed together in a tank”, Mr Jackson said.

SPCA executive director, Bob Kerridge, says the organisation wants to stop cruelty to crayfish and had yet to decide if any operators would be charged.

The game has been the subject of intense investigation by the SPCA, involving expert species specialists and legal advice, Mr Kerridge said.

"Our expert advice is that the crayfish subjected to this arcade game are likely to suffer unreasonable or unnecessary pain or distress which is unacceptable in our view", he said.

"In view of this, after careful consideration, we have taken steps to prevent the further infliction of trauma on these animals."

He said under the Animal Welfare Act (1999) inspects may take “all such steps as are necessary or desirable to prevent or mitigate the suffering of the animal”.

The SPCA would do that by “rendering the mechanical parts of the machine unable to be used”, Mr Kerridge said.

Police escorts may be used if the SPCA inspectors do not get co-operation from pub managers.

Acknowledging the action might prompt court action against the SPCA, Mr Kerridge said he was satisfied the society had reasonable grounds, including legal advice, to take the action.

“The SPCA will simply not tolerate cruelty to animals in any form or for any reason,” he says.

It is understood games outside the Auckland region would also be closed.

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Comments [16]

e
17 Feb 2010 9:20p.m.

i agree w all comments that this is unreasonable and inhumane but am i the only one curious as to what the 'winner' does if they actually caught the crayfish? they cary it away w their bare hands? i mean, its just a stupid idea, created purely to earn the owner of the machine money, so i conclude that yet again, animals are exploited, the main influence behind the cruelty is money.

William Paul
12 Feb 2010 4:44p.m.

These "catch-a-cray" machines are one of many examples of why our Use of Animals is trivial and unnecessary.

I absolutely agree with Mr Kerridge's words.
The Crayfishes' pain and suffering is 'unreasonable' and 'unnecessary'. We can extend this definition to ALL Animals.
Andrew Jackson is right about the same thing is done to Crayfish in 'sea food markets'. That is my point. All Animal Use is wrong. If we take Animals seriously, that means going Vegan.
I wish the SPCA and SAFE (both whom are not Animal Rights groups) would advocate for Veganism.

If you agree with Mr Jackson's second comment that the Crayfish 'are not being abused' I urge you to rethink.
Ask yourself, if this were your children, loved ones or companion animals, would this not be abuse?

Please, Go Vegan. It's better for your Health, Planet and most importantly - The Animals.

SamVegan
11 Feb 2010 4:13p.m.

It is very clear that catcha-cray machines are morally wrong. Most people recognise that it is wrong to hurt crayfish and other animals for reasons of pleasure, or because we enjoy it.

Yet in reality, our use of animal products are just as unnecessary as using catcha-cray machines. People play(ed) catch-cray because they enjoy doing that. People eat meat, dairy and eggs because they enjoy it, people wear leather becasue they enjoy the look and feel etc.

Rather then viewing the problem as this one machine, we need to look at the bigger picture and relaise that all human exploitation of animals is completely trivial and unnecessary. And recognising that begins with going vegan. Veganism is a moral stand against animal exploitation, commodification, death and suffering. Vegans avoid animal products as much as is possible within a specieist society.

Check out www.vegansociety.co.nz for information on going vegan and check out www.abolitionistapproach.com for more information on why you should go vegan.

Being vegan is easy, it's good for your health, it's good for teh environment, but most importantly, it's the morally right thing to do.

Emmy
11 Feb 2010 11:31a.m.

So what happens to the crayfish now? They will still likely end up on someone's plate. No animal wants to die, and what makes "food" animals any different to a pet dog or cat? They all feel pain. They all have a right to live. If you want to prevent cruelty to animals, go vegan.

Tarasa
11 Feb 2010 4:01a.m.

I've never seen anything like this game before! How is this "fun" in any way? Besides the cruelty aspect, it sounds like an exceptionally silly way to waste your time and money. It's peculiar how often people will say "Oh, you only care because it's a cute puppy/kitty/bunny," but I'm sure in this situation there will be a lot people saying "Back off - it's only a crustacean." Pain and suffering is pain and suffering, no matter who experiences it. I say "Go vegan".

Charles
11 Feb 2010 3:19a.m.

Its sad that an organization has to go to work to end stupidity. Cruelty should be an anti-social act and unacceptable to anyone. Those who support it...well we should have many questions about them. Ive never had fun by making anything or anyone else suffer.

LiveVegan
11 Feb 2010 12:32a.m.

The only way to avoid animal abuse and cruelty is to go vegan. It's easy. It's better for you, better for the planet, and most importantly, it's the morally right thing to do. Check this out http://www.veganpamphlet.com

CV
10 Feb 2010 10:52p.m.

The SPCA also said "They become agitated and they take an alarmed stance when the coins go in,they know that they are in danger." Scientists have shown that these animals are sentient, they feel pain, pleasure, stress, have memory, form social hierarchies and likely possess a host of other emotions and abilities too. They have the ability to learn. They have a central nervous system and a brain. Crustaceans are no more reflex automatons than are fish, birds or mammals including ourselves, they experience pain and the suffering which arises from pain. Using, killing and eating crayfish or any other animals for human pleasure or convenience is morally unacceptable (and let's face it, if you're able to read this article eating animals is about pleasure, not necessity). We have the alternative of a healthy, varied vegan diet, there really is no excuse.

Kelly
10 Feb 2010 10:30p.m.

Mike, soft toys are just as much fun to get from these machines and by doing that, you won't be inflicting harm on anyone.

Jordan Wyatt
10 Feb 2010 10:22p.m.

I wonder what will happen to the lobsters that have been "saved". By the sounds of it, they are going into another, larger tank, where they will still be killed and eaten? Really, we should focus on not hurting animals at all. SAFE and the SPCA should promote Veganism. I guess "animal cruelty" only matters when someone jabs a cat with a pin, or kicks a dog, but for the 56 billion land animals killed each year for our "food", they dont matter...? "One death is a tragedy; one million is a statistic. Joseph Stalin "

Post a comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide here
Name:
Email: (Won't be published)
Comment:



3News Video 3News Audio

Post your opinion

3News - Was the force used at the Dotcom mansion excessive?
On January 20th, two helicopters and 76 police officers arrived a
Comments (189)