• Full Story

Australia may shoot camels to curb methane problems

Print

Fri, 10 Jun 2011 4:30a.m.

Each camel belches an estimated 45 kilograms of methane a year

Each camel belches an estimated 45 kilograms of methane a year

By Rod McGuirk

Kill a camel, earn cash for cutting greenhouse gases: That offer may be coming soon in Australia, where vast numbers of the nonnative, methane-belching animals have been trampling the Outback for more than a century.

The government has proposed that killing camels be officially registered as a means of reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Australia has the world's largest population of wild camels - an estimated 1.2 million - and considers them to be a growing environmental problem.

The proposal, released for public comment this week, would allow sharpshooters to earn so-called carbon credits for slaughtering camels. Industrial polluters around the world could buy the credits to offset their own carbon emissions.

Each camel belches an estimated 45 kilograms of methane a year, which is equivalent to a metric ton of carbon dioxide in its impact on global warming. That's roughly one-sixth the amount of CO2 that the US Environmental Protection Agency says an average car produces annually.

A bill to create a carbon credit regime will go to a vote in the House of Representatives on Wednesday and is expected to become law within weeks.

A government registry will be set up to determine what actions will qualify for carbon credits, and bureaucrats are expected to decide by the end of the year whether killing camels will be among them.

Mark Dreyfus, the government's parliamentary secretary for climate change, said he hopes the proposal wipes out camels from the Australian wild.

"Potentially it has tremendous merit, because feral camels are a dreadful menace across the whole of arid Australia," Dreyfus told The Associated Press on Thursday.

First introduced in the 1840s to help explorers and pioneers travel through Australia's arid interior, camels now cover vast tracts of the continent's parched and sparsely populated center and west.

Camels compete with sheep and cattle for food, trample vegetation and invade remote settlements in search of water, scaring residents as they tear apart bathrooms and rip up water pipes.

The government estimates camel numbers double every nine years, despite recent government-funded culls and a small export meat trade with the Middle East.

"It's not well understood because they're in remote areas of Australia what extraordinary damage this very, very large wild camel population is doing in an economic, environmental and social sense," Dreyfus said.

Under the new environmental law, Dreyfus said, the camels could be slaughtered for their meat as well as carbon credits - adding to the financial return to those who currently herd and kill camels for human and pet food. Shooters in helicopters could also claim carbon credits if they proved that they had humanely killed a camel and abandoned its carcass.

Garry Dan, a central Australian cattle rancher who also catches camels for their meat, described the added carbon credit value for carcasses as "ideal."

He said while camels were freely available in the wild, they are expensive to truck to abattoirs because they are too big for standard cattle trailers.

The carbon trading business Northwest Carbon first pitched carbon credits for camels to the government. Its managing director, Tim Moore, said it was too early to place a dollar value on each dead animal.

"Obviously the higher the value, the faster we're going to be able to eradicate the problem of the feral camel pest in Australia," Moore said.

Killing camels is one of three proposals currently being considered by the government for carbon credits under the new law. The others would extract methane from landfills and change how Aborigines manage fire in savannah grasslands.

Australia plans to make its worst industrial polluters pay a tax on every ton of carbon gas they produce from July 1, 2012. The government aims to slash Australia's greenhouse emissions to 5 percent below 2000 levels by 2020.

AP

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

10 Jun 2011 04:00p.m.

ricsta wrote:

These greenies are truly stupid. They are only surpassed in their stupidity by the politians that listen to them.

10 Jun 2011 01:53p.m.

Rosie wrote:

This is another reason why I am ashamed to be human. I agree with the other comments. There is more polution in the big cities all over the world. I am so sick to death of Greenies and their pushing their agenda on the rest of us. Would be good if we could eradicate them. Life would be so much less stressful. Leave the camels alone - makes me wonder, like "scared resident" said - what will be next - Dugongs and Koalas - or and what about the Great White Sharks and other fish species? Then we could go for the bears, lions, tigers etc etc plus all domestic animals. The mind bogles as to what "fun" some would like to have satisfying their "murdering instinct" by getting rid of all species other than human. I know I am dramatising this, but I am so upset at yet another "problem" to be "solved" by killing poor defenceless animals. Humans let off methane gas too, you know!

10 Jun 2011 12:45p.m.

ned wrote:

look at other places in the world , cities have more pollution than any animals,
how many camels do u see in town ?
look at london or shanghai or santiago, yes no camels there , but cannot see the sun in most of those cities why , total airpollution . , no camels or cows there

10 Jun 2011 10:04a.m.

wryta wrote:

Important words here... "feral", "menace", "environmental damage". Ignore the greenhouse gas dodginess (a large pine tree contributes more greenhouse gases than a car - how about we cull them, greenies?) - it's worth eradicating them to protect the real-life environment of today.

10 Jun 2011 09:24a.m.

James wrote:

Why not shoo t a Politican...They let off more gas than any Camel !!! Cheers, James.

10 Jun 2011 09:06a.m.

Scared Resident wrote:

Next up, Dugongs and Koalas. They be tearin' up yo sea grass and rippin up yo eucalyptus

10 Jun 2011 05:53a.m.

Mike wrote:

People also produce methane although in smaller amounts. should we suggest a culling scheme for the non-productive people too?

Dairy cows produce methane from breathing so we already have had greens suggest culling the NZ Dairy industry.