• Full Story

Australian heatwave is connected to climate change - IPCC

Print

Heatwave has climate change link - IPCC

3News NZ

Australia's heatwave is likely to be linked to global warming (Reuters)

Australia's heatwave is likely to be linked to global warming (Reuters)

Contrary to claims made by an Auckland scientist earlier in the week, scientists from around the world and New Zealand are saying the recent Australian heatwave is part of a global trend.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) chairman Rajendra Pachauri has told media the Australia heatwave is part of a warming trend around the world and says more heatwaves are likely.

“We already are getting more frequent and more intense heatwaves, and we are also going to get extreme precipitation events.”

The IPCC, which is currently meeting in Hobart, warned on Tuesday that heatwaves in Australia could become six times more frequent within 30 years.

But earlier this week associate professor of climate and environment science Chris de Freitas of the University of Auckland said there was no evidence to suggest the Australian heatwave was connected to climate change.

“It’s speculation, not fact,” he told 3 News, saying there was no evidence humans were to blame for rising global temperatures.

However James Renwick, a climate scientist at Victoria University of Wellington attending the IPCC conference in Hobart, says although it is difficult to pin one event to climate change, there probably is a connection.

 “You can’t ever say a particular heatwave is because of climate change…. [but] there is a connection in the sense that the temperatures over in Australia have gone up over the last century or so, and that means it’s easier for a heatwave to happen.”

Dr Renwick says better evidence of climate change would be seeing repeated heatwaves.

“If we start seeing these more often, that would be better evidence.”

He says a 1degC increase in temperature could double the risk of heatwaves, and expects the frequency of heatwaves in Australia to increase.

“The expectation is we will start seeing these extremes more and more often in the future.”

Dr Renwick says other extremes of weather, like rain and flooding, are also a sign of the earth warming up.

“The amount of moisture in the air is directly proportional to the heat of the air. The chances of getting a heavy rainfall event increases if there is an increase in temperature.

“Generally in a lot of ways the [global] climate is becoming more extreme.”

He is not so sure if New Zealand’s extremes of warm weather in some areas and flooding in others recently are related to climate change.

“That sort of thing has been going on forever. It’s the same story that if you see the occurrence of these very warm conditions and flooding conditions increasing over time.”

Dr Renwick says to really see if climate change is happening, you’ve got to look at trends over a number of years.

He says the decline in the number of frosts in New Zealand is a sign of climate change, and he expects frosts here to disappear by the end of this century.

In his criticism, Dr de Freitas also referred to a leaked draft of the IPCC five-year assessment report which appeared to claim global temperatures have not risen in the past 16 years.

Mr Renwick says this is probably correct.

“That’s right, globally temperatures over the last 10 or 15 years have not risen as fast as you would expect.”

But he says this doesn’t mean climate change is not happening. He says the late 1990s were very warm because of the warm El Nino climate system, but the 2000s have been cooler because of La Nina, which acts to cool the climate.

“Once you take account of that effect, behind that, temperatures are going up and greenhouse gases are going up.

“Fifteen years is still a pretty short period to look at the trend.”

3 News

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

20/01/2013 2:37:51 p.m.

Stamper wrote:

Your article about the IPCC does not reflect the reality These are tough times for the Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming fear mongers: · Regarding Australian bush fires and storms like Sandy on New York; “Nature Magazine” backed away from this being caused by CAGW in 2012. See : http://www.nature.com/news/extreme-weather-1.11428 · the UK Met Office has recently admitted that we've had no Global warming for 15 years, and they don't expect any for another 5 years. Yep - two decades - no warming. · meantime over the last 15 years CO2 has risen from about 320ppm to 390ppm. So - no connection between CO2 and Global Warming - the CO2 has gone up; the temperature has not risen. · two weeks ago NASA released a new study - they believe the sun may effect Global Warming much more than CO2 - who would have guessed it? Now can we put a tax on sunlight? About as useful as a tax on CO2. PS: And further good news – I bought some bananas yesterday. Ten years ago we were told that they’d all be gone by 2013 – another dooms-dayer bites the dust.

20/01/2013 2:00:18 p.m.

Tiana wrote:

Quite obviously, this is the case. Many other scientists with more credible credentials have been saying this for decades.

20/01/2013 12:37:53 p.m.

Martin wrote:

If you do university study the inclusive of the biosystem and ecosystems they have changed over hundreds of millions of years and no weather event or change is outside the normal planets cycles. Man made pollution is of concern purely due to the direct pollutions inhaled and absorbed by humans, animals and organisms. I am scarce of hysteria caused by scientists and "experts" who cry wolf then over 10,000 of then travel on several polluting mediums of transport to a conference a talk about sweet nothing's then travel back. What powers their flash offices, builds them, provides their equipment, car, disposes of the batteries in their battery car (do they drive them)? etc. What nonsense.

19/01/2013 9:05:01 a.m.

Aphrodite wrote:

Why Do you report anything the IPCC has to say, as facts. They are an extremely corrupt organisation,, only out to spread propaganda and lies for their own gain.

18/01/2013 5:03:16 p.m.

Nonentity wrote:

Dr Renwick can't bring himself to concede the temperature "standstill" (as James Hansen puts it) yet. How many more years of standstill before he does? He also doesn't say that El Nino was dominant for a much longer period than what he would like people to think, actually from mid 1970s to mid 2000s:- http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/enso/mei/ts.gif There's now no longer any correlation between climatic temperatures and GHGs. Dr Renwick will have to concede that eventually.

18/01/2013 10:26:51 a.m.

Jonno wrote:

It may be connected to climate change, but prove its man-made climate change and not a natural cycle of the earth. . There is a difference and the former theory is promoted only so Govts can tax countries till they bleed. And the stupid part about this globel warming tax is that it doesnt address the so called cause of it.If you go over your carbon credits You pay your "fine" and then your are allowed to keep on polluting. wheres the logic in that?. That is why most people with a brain realise this must be just a revenue collecting scam . All kicked off by AL Gore, the biggest con man around. do your home work on him. He has a lot to gain monitarily on carbon credits. NZ doesnt need to be a part of all this.