3News » Home
Full Story

'Before and after' photos banned in cosmetic surgery ads

6 comments | Post Comment email Email printer friendly Print    Text Size:
aA
aA
aA
New medical council guidelines say: "You may use before and after photos during consultations [but] you must not use them in advertisements"

New medical council guidelines say: "You may use before and after photos during consultations [but] you must not use them in advertisements"

video
Wed, 05 May 2010 5:38p.m.

By Simon Shepherd

Plastic surgeons are concerned over a medical council ban on the use of "before and after" photos in advertising.

The council believes some photos can mislead or glamourise surgery, but doctors and surgeons say the pre-op, post-op snaps are used to educate.

New medical council guidelines say: "You may use before and after photos during consultations [but] you must not use them in advertisements."

Dr John Adams, of the Medical Council, says photos are misleading.

“It is very important that such advertisements not be glamourised, patients need full information and photos don't convey full information,” he says.

In an industry dependent on image, the decision has come as a shock.

“Patients need these before and after photos to make informed decisions about treatments that are available,” says Dr Teresa Cattin, from the College of Appearance Medicine.

Plastic surgeons say the photos play a key role before the consultation.

“Patients that I have spoken to on the councils view on this are quite upset saying why do this we, why do we need to take away because it is useful and important to understand about making choices about surgery,” says Murray Beagley, of the Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

The council argues photos can foster false expectations but publisher for cosmetic surgery magazine Beautiful You says local photos are realistic.

“If we don’t have that or get that from our surgeon then we have to run aspirational, false American images, and that would be worse because they are going to have false expectations,” says Vanessa Green.

Appearance medicine doctors have already written to the medical council asking it to reconsider its position.

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Comments [6]

lk
12 May 2010 3:35p.m.

that is an awsome job

p
11 May 2010 7:01p.m.

i love tv3

anita
11 May 2010 3:10p.m.

I have taken many photos for surgeons and no we do not enhance the shots and no we do not change the lighting. Of course the lighting cannot be the same as it is in the first photos as its a different day that the final shot is taken.
To make a rule that surgeons cannot run before and after images is crazy and old fashioned and far too pc for my liking. Very few people change images, you get results from surgery you dont need to photoshop to enhance them- the results are clear to see.

jowsey
11 May 2010 2:26p.m.

my stomach looks like the before pic and im 15

Chris
06 May 2010 5:43p.m.

This decision is good, they should not be allowed in advertisements because they do mislead people, often intentionally. 'Before' shots are quite often taken in poor lighting conditions so the skin looks an unhealthy colour, if the person's face is visible they are often frowning or have a neutral expression. 'After' shots on the other hand are taken in proper lighting so the skin shows up in a more desirable way, and the person will usually be smiling. These techniques when used are designed to mislead and they do have more of an effect than people realise. The article's picture of the stomach, for example, show differences in colour probably due to lighting.

Sair Hamilton
05 May 2010 8:51p.m.

Hi, The photo in the background of the closing shot was me. And it definitely wasn't photoshopped or 'enhanced'! Seeing other before and after photos gave me a very good idea of what I could expect from nose surgery, and the surgeon explained clearly that I would still look like me, just with a different nose. It helped me to make a decision, even though my surgery was for medical reasons. I don't think 'enhanced photos should be allowed as advertisement, as it gives a very unreal idea of the result, and is therefore misleading. But natural 'after shots' helped me tremendously, and I wasn't misled at all.

Post a comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide here
Name:
Email: (Won't be published)
Comment:



3News Video 3News Audio

Post your opinion