3News » Home

Benefit bludger stories

Fri, 22 Oct 2010 4:13p.m.

By Kim Chisnall

Kelly Marshall from Falmouth in Cornwall has never worked a day in her life. The 32-year-old mother of five fell pregnant at 15, dropped out of school and has been claiming benefits ever since. She has a yearly income of £29,000 (NZ$60,000) and her family lives pretty well - each of the bedrooms in her council flat has a flat-screen television, she has a separate walk in wardrobe for her collection of jeans, takes her family on two foreign holidays a year and this year managed to save enough to pay for a £4500 breast increase.

It's that last expenditure that made the headlines, "Sponger's £4,500 boob job on benefits" screamed Closer magazine and in Marshall's local newspaper, "Benefits boob op mum: I'm no scrounger".

To many, Marshall's lifestyle epitomises all that is wrong with Britain's welfare system - council flats for life, benefits so generous they remove any incentive to get a job and a highly developed sense of entitlement - Marshall told the magazine: "I don't think me or my children should miss out on nice things just because I have never worked."

Benefit bludger stories always make good copy, someone living the life of Riley on your taxes? Cue outrage. This story was particularly poignant however because this week the government announced as part of its spending cuts it's slashing the welfare budget by £18 billion by 2015.

Gone are the council flats for life and the cost of council flats will be increased to 80 percent of those in the private market. The government has put an end to the claiming of multiple benefits - now no household can receive more than the average national income - £25,000. Those on sickness benefits will be tested to see if they are fit to return to work, if so they will lose their benefit after a year.

Life is going to change for Kelly Marshall, but so it will for thousands of other more deserving recipients. In fact the Institute for Fiscal Studies says it will be the poor that hit the hardest from the government's plans and families with children will be the biggest losers.

I'm all for weeding out the bludgers, but is it fair that all beneficiaries are being targeted by the government? Is this decision more about popular politics than any sense of justice?

 

Melissa Davies is based in London as TV3's Europe Correspondent. When she's not travelling all over the continent, she is slowly adjusting to life in the northern hemisphere.

 

Here she documents her life reporting abroad.

 

 

Comments [5]

Hone P
14 Dec 2011 07:43a.m.

I believe the NZ welfare system is in desperate need of an overhaul to stamp out the excessive benefit payments made to people ripping off the tax payer. People who absolutely cannot work should be supported but there are more and more beneficiaries lining up in the dole queue, getting a benefit and staying on it for long periods of time becoming a burden on the taxpayer. Please bear in mind that some of the biggest economies do not even compare to our welfare system in terms of access to support which is brilliant. I too have heard beneficiaries refer t winzs payments as "their entitlement" and that it is like pay. If this is the case beneficiaries answer to taxpayers.

Erin
26 Oct 2010 09:03p.m.

Sadly, i have never met anyone on the benefit seriously looking for work. My friend decided to have children (and claim the benefit) rather than working while her partner quit his job and went on benefit because he didn't like working.
This has been my experience growing up. My family was in the rental business so i saw a lot of people committing benefit fraud (i.e. claiming they live by themselves when in fact they are sharing expenses).
I know this would't represent all people getting the benefit, but i haven't met a genuine person yet... Sad really.

Deane
25 Oct 2010 05:42p.m.

Ngawhere has made a good point here. Kiwis on a benefit do tend to go out and do voluntary work. They do so because they want to feel useful and contribute.

Indeed an economic value needs to be place on those receiving a benefit while doing voluntary work. Interesting point here because alot of these orgainisations my not survive without these voluntary workers.

For example, I know a factory worker who has been laid off, been unemployed for two years, but works as a voluntary St Johns paramedic. No pay what so ever.

I do not here stories about unemployed people doing valued work because its not sensational and the media are simply not interested.

brian
25 Oct 2010 01:27p.m.

I'm now 70 and up until 5 years ago (NZ Super) never received anything I hadn't earned, no inheritances, nor Govt handouts whatsoever. My education was minimal, could have gone to Varsity - then free - but put my head down and arse up and started earning. Now I'm a multi millionaire AND still working. My father had his own business and had set us up in a top end city home and - although he could have avoided it - answered the "call" to fight for King and Country and unfortunately paid the ultimate price. Mum - for the next 5 years until remarried – and then "lost" the right to the War Widows benefit (~4 Pounds a week, $8 for those who can't work that out) sure, bread was 7 1/2 pence a loaf, milk, 4 p/pint and a brace of rabbits 1n9p (17.5c) but we survived on that only because most of our available 1/4 acre was cultivated, producing most of the - boring - food for our table. Sugar then was very cheap but deemed unaffordable so was excluded so just imagine rhubarb and gooseberries - which we grew in great profusion - without any "sweeteners" ugh. But we survived!!! Why can't all our now "benefit" receivers survive on the equivalent my mother survived on? Why? Because they either they don’t know how to, or they don’t want or need to. The “system” provides all of that instead and their next generation expects that ad in finintum.

Ngawhere
23 Oct 2010 04:42a.m.

The Benefit system seems to reward white collars criminals for their crime. For example, that judge is reported to have given a half million $ to resign as his unprofessional dealings don’t look good for the department. Those rich persons are also paid thousands $ every time they meet to discuss how to invest their money and layoff a few more workers. Expenses paid and free lunch provided by the tax payer!

All those teachers who took the time and money to acquire qualifications are put out of work by National’s policies to cut funding for Kohanga Reo, Education, Special Education, Healthcare, and so on.

And on the contrary, I haven’t come across anyone on a benefit who doesn’t want to work. Some of them do voluntary work while enduring some sort of ailment but still looking. It is an invaluable contribution to society more than work. These are unsung heroes making up for social inadequacies of capitalism.
So if you want to put your money where your mouth is, would you offer an unemployed person that you know who is a bludger a job? If not then you are just another right wing reactionary joining the chorus of benefit bashers. And your tune against 6 percent rate of unemployment is way off the beat!

Post a comment

Name:
Email: (Won't be published)
Comment:


3News Video 3News Audio

Blogs