Bennett's iwi comments slammed by Greens

Print

Mon, 23 Aug 2010 6:12p.m.

Paula Bennett

Paula Bennett

By Rebecca Wright

A suggestion by Social Development Minister Paula Bennett that iwi should "put their hands in their own pockets" and help pay for child abuse services for Maori has been called institutional racism.

Ms Bennett made the comments at an iwi leaders' forum last Friday, but reaction has been mixed.

Each year millions of taxpayer dollars are put into anti-abuse campaigns, and millions more are spent looking after the children for whom it's already too late. Half of those in care are Maori, and Ms Bennett is calling for a renewed focus by iwi leaders on abuse.

"The feeling I got was they're ready to talk about solutions, so let's not apportion blame - lets talk about who these children are, where they are and how we support them better," says Ms Bennett.

What do you think? Give us your opinion.

One idea she raises is for what she calls 'whanau finders' - a type of iwi liaison between Child, Youth and Family who would identify families within the iwi for children to be placed with.

Ms Bennett wants iwi to help pay for them and it has upset the Green Party.

"She's going begging in hand to iwi to ask them to pay for social services that she is responsible for and should be investing in," says co-leader Meteria Turei.

Whether it's an investment iwi want to make, the Maori Party says, will be up to them.

Perhaps proving there aren't many original ideas in politics, Ms Bennett's concept of a whanau finder isn't actually new at all. Labour set something similar up in the 1980s called Maatua Whangai. Some in Maoridom have been calling for a return to it for some time, but whether or not they 're happy to pay for it remains to be seen.

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

23 Dec 2010 09:32p.m.

M wrote:

@little fish/big fish
Nobody holds a gun to peoples' heads and tells them to drink or that difficult for you to work out fish.
The care-givers have a choice and they CHOOSE to drink/gamble/take drugs or whatever. And they CHOOSE to abuse their kids. You can't blame liquour companys. Maybe the abusers could CHOOSE to lay of the piss. Like David, I too understand the probs that come with excess alcohol consumption, which is why I CHOSE to give up alcohol/drugs.
And if you choose to remember little fish, they banned alcohol advertising years ago. The only alcohol ads I see are the drink driving ones on tv.
Blame the abusers and only the abusers. Its people like you who are happy to pass the buk and blame someone/thing else for your actions.
I'm find you are the one who is being patronising here big fish - not david.

23 Dec 2010 12:19p.m.

MK wrote:

Paula Bennett is so ignorant - why should iwi pay for child abuse services, is it because only Maori people abuse their children? Oh thats right, white people don't abuse their children, especially not white priests and nuns from catholic churches!! Get a grip, what is failing is Paula Bennets child and youth services who get paid millions of dollars to protect and monitor our children and guess what...it aint working!! And just maybe our newspapers/media only like publishing bad things that Maori people do so that silly woman like Paula Bennett in her continued ignorance can maintain her belief that only Maori people commit abuse and therefore should payout. And just maybe Paula Bennett could also admit that this problem is a societal issue full stop! Look at your policies and tell us how you are making a difference in the lives of the less fortunate. Giving less money to beneficiaries aint helping either!!

13 Dec 2010 05:49p.m.

waka wrote:

no doubt about it ,she must go. maori are starving all over nz with unemployment. freezing workers in wairoa talk of fishing to eat,no fish kids starve. the minister has done nothing when the town asked her to come and see for herself.
no show must go. this is a hard nosed gov't that smiles and walks away. bring on the election. waka

01 Dec 2010 12:59p.m.

nukefree wrote:

Right on jackp.

31 Aug 2010 12:04a.m.

Gosh wrote:

Hmmm, nicely said J. Oppressors however come in many forms. When rasing ourselves from a so called oppression, it can only ever be justified if others do not become oppressed in the process. Other-wise the oppression never existed in the first place, only the desire to have what others own. We must also realise that 'History', is exactly that. Never letting it pollute our future and the futures of the young.

30 Aug 2010 09:46p.m.

Aroha J wrote:

@ Holly K, your "let's start moving forward" narrative illustrates your (and others) complete ignorance of history, and it is a discourse that has plagued mainstream media since the Treaty was breached some fifteen years after it was signed. Until we can place the social issues we face in this country in its historical context, we will not gain the depth of understanding required to resolve them. For it is only when we liberate the oppressor can we liberate the oppressed.

26 Aug 2010 09:10a.m.

big fish wrote:

@david it is patronising and arrogant to assume that millions of dollars of advertising isn't coercing.If advertising isn't urging or driving people to consume the product david, then it is patronising comments like yours that suggest that the general public just line up and shovel these products down their throats with out any thought or coercion. Are you so ignorant or arrogant that you are not aware of the vast amount of documentation that is available on the web and documentaries, confirming a coercive approach these industries have used for decades. They target ethnic and demographic divides,check out the Maori cigarettes and the bright colourful bottles our young people like to drink david!!! I hope you are not one those corporate figures who is trying to defend his prophets.(greed)

25 Aug 2010 08:41p.m.

David wrote:

@little fish liquor manufacturers and retailers don't coerce customers into buying their products, the customers do so by their own free will. The increasing number of liquor stores is merely the inevitable response to an increase in the consumption of alcohol, something which invariably starts with the consumer making reckless decisions. Believe me, little fish, I understand the problems associated with excess alcohol consumption far greater than you understand basic English.

25 Aug 2010 10:43a.m.

Trev wrote:

The Ministry of Social Development make huge errors leading to abuse from errors that their staff make.

These people are barely ever adequately compensated.

Many lives are destoyed by the mistakes the Ministry of social development has made and it considers adequate compensation to be a life long Winz benefit.

This is just a National government ploy to extend a user pays system into the community relieving itself of any obligations.

24 Aug 2010 10:25p.m.

little fish wrote:

@david alcohol is at the root of a lot these problems or is that difficult for you to work out david... when liquor companies target area's like south Auckland were there are almost more liquor outlets than bus stops... who is really the irresponsible factor here david... they should be called upon to be accountable for the damage their products cause... these huge cooperation are not as thick as some people!!! david