3News » Home
Kim Dotcom
Full Story

Blogger prosecuted over 'suppression breach'

6 comments | Post Comment email Email printer friendly Print    Text Size:
aA
aA
aA
Cameron Slater says he is being prosecuted for naming two celebrities on his blog

Cameron Slater says he is being prosecuted for naming two celebrities on his blog

video
Thu, 24 Dec 2009 5:27p.m.

By Rebecca Wright

The man who writes Whaleoil, one of the country's best known blogs, is being prosecuted for what police say is breach of court suppression orders.

Cameron Slater is the first New Zealand blogger to be taken to court instead of just warned.

He has removed the items from his website after advice that if he didn't, he could be fined $5000 a day.

It is a tricky name and shame campaign which has landed the right wing blogger, known as Whaleoil, in hot water with the law.

Slater says he is being prosecuted for naming two celebrities on his blog.  

“I've allegedly named two celebrities or so called celebrities on my blog - that’s what the police have alleged,” he says.

But it wasn't words that Slater posted on his blog; it was a series of pictures which the police say reveals the identities of two high profile people with name suppression for separate sexual offences.

“They've got form - they've got history - ones been in the slammer before so I couldn't see a reason why they should have name suppression,” he says.

Slater says he hasn't named anyone - just posted a series of random pictures, but media expert Martin Hirst believes that is enough to get him busted.

“Perhaps he was thinking that this was a clever way to get around the whole legal problem he's now facing, obviously the prosecutors had a different idea,” he says.

Posting the pictures was a protest by Slater at the way suppression orders are granted.

Although the internet has become a popular place for publishing suppressed material this is the first time a blogger will be brought before the courts.

Slater will be appearing at the Auckland District Court on January 5, he says he will fight any charges and that pictures will form part of his defence.

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Comments [6]

Michael
26 Dec 2009 5:15p.m.

You think the Police have better thing to do than worry about some one that has name someone that has name suppression for sexual offences we have the Right to know who thay are.

Gregor
26 Dec 2009 1:34a.m.

Susan ... how astute of you .. Hone Hiki .. felt the same effects ... !!!

Felicia
25 Dec 2009 8:38p.m.

So let me get this straight... Breaking a court order = bad. Breaking a beneficiary's right to privacy (which is supposed to guaranteed under an Act of Parliament) = good, especially if television cameras are watching.

Rickar
25 Dec 2009 4:44p.m.

Meh just publish the names on an overseas site. Peewee Herman got done for similar and he had heaps of money

Alien
25 Dec 2009 9:01a.m.

Susan, you have no idea what a police state and have just made the most pathetic statement of the year in thinking so. What an insult you are to those who live in countries who do not have speech. And what a fool you are to think that people should have the right to break a legal court order.

Susan
25 Dec 2009 12:39a.m.

Well if he is a blogger he should know by now that new zealand is a police state and free speach is long since gone ask Hone he will tell ya.

Post a comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide here
Name:
Email: (Won't be published)
Comment:



3News Video 3News Audio