3News » Home
Full Story

Brash urges Key to change super and retirement age

14 comments | Post Comment email Email printer friendly Print    Text Size:
aA
aA
aA
Dr Brash says it's a natural first step towards a bigger change – increasing the age when Kiwis should become eligible for New Zealand super

Dr Brash says it's a natural first step towards a bigger change – increasing the age when Kiwis should become eligible for New Zealand super

video
Thu, 22 Jul 2010 6:18p.m.

By Duncan Garner

Former National Party leader Don Brash is urging the man who replaced him, Prime Minister John Key, to signal changes to national superannuation and the retirement age.

But Mr Key is refusing to take the bait because he has promised not to change the rules, or he will resign as Prime Minister.

All Kiwis receive national superannuation at aged 65, no matter how rich or poor you are; a married couple, from October, gets $511.

But Don Brash says 65 is too young and more flexibility is needed; take a bigger pension at an older age or retire at 65 and get a smaller pension for a longer time.

“If we're going to raise the age of eligibility when people get super, let’s make it more attractive and flexible about when they draw that down, Dr Brash says.

Dr Brash says it's a natural first step towards a bigger change – increasing the age when Kiwis should become eligible for New Zealand super - to cut the ballooning costs.

“Over the next decade it's likely we will have to raise the age at which people can be eligible for it,” he says.

But the National Government disagrees and is refusing to debate the idea – all because of John Key's pre-election promise not to change any of the entitlements and payments of New Zealand super – if he does, he will resign.

“We're happy with way it's working,” he says. “It's an elegant system… works well.”

Dr Brash, of course, is unimpressed by that – he says Mr Key should signal changes now.

“That's what I would hope he would do; as the Australians have done..."

Even the Government's own economic advisors were today advocating for changes at a retirement conference – advice that will, of course, fall on Mr Key's deaf ears.

Treasury says 13 percent of government spending currently goes on the cost of national superannuation – it will be 22 percent by 2050.

Right now there are two people over 65 for every 10 workers; in 50 years it will be four people.

Still, Mr Key won't debate it.

“They also say we should get rid of zero percent student loans and working for families which this Government won't be doing either.”

Australia, the UK and the US have all raised their retirement ages to 67 and over.

But it's not a debate the Government can have – because of Mr Key's promise to resign if changes are made – but the pressure will only continue to build.

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Comments [14]

Don't agree
29 Jul 2010 7:48a.m.

Don Brash's statement that in the UK and the US the retirement age has been raised to 67 is based on ignorance. While the figures may well be true the system in force in the UK and the US is extremely different from NZ. NZ needs a flexible retirement system the way it is now because NZ is so isolated from the rest of the world. If the systems in place in the UK and in US were enforced in NZ, nobody would live in NZ anymore.

Mani
27 Jul 2010 6:33p.m.

why JB... because you just about blowen your expenditure budget and you need us pay you to become a Fat Duck

Huang
26 Jul 2010 2:45p.m.

johnmillan you should give your $200.00/wk beer money to those make believe oldies you speak of. Are you talking about your self and being rejected from WINZ for a top up week in week out? Stop bludging off our hard earn taxes johnmillan. Say something desent for a change!

MISS S
26 Jul 2010 12:53p.m.

Ah now I know why he won't agree with Brash. Key once aid he'd resign if he raised the age to qualify for Super.

johnmillan
24 Jul 2010 2:30p.m.

Every time you turn too the news the same thing comes up.Brash warnings of the problems that will exist if the Key government dont raise the pensions from 65-67.but Key will not budge,as he say!s he is a man of his promises and word.Will how come he has already told lies and broken promises,Is he really true too his word,or is he calling us all bluff,mainly those who are on pensions as he has already given little and taken extra,now going down the line is home help,and all the rest of those nasty little things that the oldies have too take,as are too old too fight back,power and food prices,An old lady who we met yesterday,in the shopping mall was looking for a place too sit down,we spoke with her and she said that she was so shocked that she bought the very same items as all ways,and she said that what she got for her $80-00 it cost her little over $100.We said to her just wait till you get your increase on 1st October,her reply was it will all go on my doctors bill and power.We know how some of those old people must feel,and too embarrassed to go to the income support for the elderly,as they think that they are bad managers,this is the feelings of lots of the oldies that my wife and I know.And the write ups and tv news that come over give the old folk mistrust or something like they are a burden too society,the way Key speaks out.and the media.

Pitball
24 Jul 2010 8:15a.m.

Brash when Appointed Leader of the Opposition failed to attack the ruling Labour Gov. on financial policy. What a looser - a bankrupt thinker. He and his supporters have no solution for future generations. How come they can earn such big money talking rubbish. In 20 years time we will look back on this bankrupt thinking. They have paved their way to political suicide.

Gary
23 Jul 2010 11:50a.m.

Brash himself should retire and save the taxpayer thousands of dollars that he is being paid to give dumb advice. National superannuation is a social contract - those who have worked for years, paying taxes and supporting those before them did this in exchange for the same in return when they reach 60...sorry 65 - National broke that promise as well. It is a sacred cow not for slaughter.

Kath
23 Jul 2010 11:13a.m.

Its defiantly not such as stupid idea due to people living longer these days. It is an idea I thought Keys would go for, but then again he's probably just thinking about himself and his rich mates.

Andrew Stevenson
23 Jul 2010 9:20a.m.

Uh-oh. I agree 100 per cent with Mr Brash. He is completely correct with his numbers (I did some analysis with the Statistics NZ numbers myself.)

If we don't reduce the amount of superannuation (which I'd oppose) or increase the age (which I'd support) it will be broke in my lifetime.

The consequences of that are horrific. (I'm well set-up, so I will be fine, but we need to think about the bigger picture and not just be selfish.)

Brit: Can you give a source for your information on the average age? Although, regardless of what other countries do, shouldn't we do the right thing?

Jim
23 Jul 2010 2:25a.m.

Duncan Garner, you should have questioned the veracity of good cop-bad cop. You knew that was what Brash was doing. Do we have to do all your work for you? You are a national party 'ho.

Post a comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide here
Name:
Email: (Won't be published)
Comment:



3News Video 3News Audio