Brash's dopey trainwreck politics

Print

Mon, 26 Sep 2011 1:04p.m.

Don Brash - not averse to legalising cannabis

Don Brash - not averse to legalising cannabis

By Duncan Garner

Don Brash's decision to muse aloud about decriminalising cannabis is so damn strange it makes me think two things may have happened.

He's either smoked a joint for the first time before deciding this (doubt it), or he really is a National plant (sorry about the pun).

Brash's politics is just wrong on so many fronts. Yes there's an argument to decriminalise weed. Yes it costs hundreds of millions of dollars to police and yes half a million people smoke it. And yes there is a case to be made to look at the laws around it. 

But no one expected it to come from ACT and Brash. It's not smart, it's not tricky. ACT has set itself up as the party of law and order and zero tolerance and three strikes and you're out. Decriminalising weed is not and should not be part of that narrative. It does not fit. It never will. Not even for a libertarian.

And what's worse is that Brash never told anyone in the party he was doing this. No wonder John Boscawen walked away. I actually think Boscawen is a principled bloke. He never set the world on fire and was odd at times, but he was principled and this was a step too far.

Again it shows what a trainwreck Brash is when it comes to internal politics. He never told anyone. He never listens, he doesn't take advice. He has no advisers, and if he does, he can't hear them.

And Brash has form on this. He never told Georgina Te Heu Heu about his Orewa speech in 2004 - she was National's Maori Affairs Spokesperson. She resigned from the role after his speech. He never told former welfare spokesperson Katherine Rich about his Orewa Mark 2 speech on DPB mums and welfare reforms.

She too was sacked for not agreeing with Brash - just like Te Heu Heu.

And now he has John Banks to deal with. Banks is the only guy that can get ACT home this election, in the Epsom seat.

Banks has never been a supporter of things like dope and homosexuality. He's a deep, deep conservative. In fact Banks is on record against cannabis. He's a fomer Police Minister with strongly held conservative views. Again Brash didn't run it by him - just a heads up even would have been nice for Banks.

But no. Brash is a solitary man. A man from another generation where listening to others is low on his list of priorities. I have no doubt this may well be a deeply held personal view. But it clashes with his party, it clashes with the views of high profile candidate Banks.

It makes it much harder for Banks to win Epsom actually. Do those conservative voters want cannabis decriminalised? I doubt it. Brash has confused ACT's message. He wants a foot in the law and order camp and one outside it. Politics doesn't work like that.

No one in the mainstream of politics is calling for this issue to be debated. What on earth is Brash up to?

ACT has looked sick for a couple of years now. But it seems the doctor may have just decided the illness is terminal, and it's all his own fault.

Brash's takeover of the party has been underwhelming. He hasn't delivered. MPs have walked away. The Party's PR guy Lindsay Perigo only lasted a few months, if that.

The party is seriously factionalised and the in-fighting continues. It's a party for old white men, a farmer and a former Police Minister who suddenly believe in cannabis being decriminalised.

Really? It's just not credible.

In my view ACT's official death-rattle just got louder.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

3/11/2011 12:00:28 a.m.

Will wrote:

You are a awful reporter. Go smoke a joint.

27/10/2011 12:30:16 p.m.

James J.Read wrote:

Duncan, when will you learn that for most parties cannabis is a conscience issue.? Yes, Brash and Banks do differ on the issue, but you can find a similar split in National or Labour.

25/10/2011 9:42:24 p.m.

Kieran wrote:

Our political system has failed the common person.. allot of the posts here are made in ignorance of the facts .. here is one fact that few can debate, Hemp is the most versatile plant on the planet.. the list the products can be made from Hemp is off the map! because of this its use is banned everywhere ?.. huh? why u ask.. its banned by the people who will lose profit (and control) if its used widely.. powerful people who can circumvent our political systems with might alone.. their single vote effectively counts for many thousands of our votes.. these people get want they want at the expense of other people, other voters, the very thing that our political system is there to prevent.. my vote and your vote should be worth the same to the system, but its not. The system has failed us. Most people in the system seem to know this.. the people who want to change the system can't because of the mighty few. Hemp when its given its day in the sun is ideally suited to NZ, Hemp could go along long way to developing NZ into a full and balanced economy. Will we see this day? yes when we see the day where my vote is worth the same as your vote and not before.

1/10/2011 4:44:05 p.m.

Grunter wrote:

Excellent post, Duncan. Nailed it. ACT will drown in their cesspit of hypocrity.

28/09/2011 6:32:29 p.m.

pixie wrote:

When brash rolled hide that spoke volumes about the guy,he considered hide a long time, good friend,is that how you treat long time friends? absolutely shameful.
Is there a tactic here though?to get banks in.
Surely epsom voters can see through the wanna be's so that they can put their snouts into the lucrative troughs of a tax payer funded life, for doing next to nothing.

27/09/2011 12:21:23 p.m.

Neil wrote:

Most of the posters here have already stated the obvious - Brash should just do what the US, Canada et al have done and call his party the Libertarian Party - folk would then look it up and maybe start voting for them. John Banks belongs in a Christian Heritage party - he's as far right red neck Christian as you can get and wouldn't know libertarianism if it hit him in the forehead- mind you Duncan - you seem to be not far behind. Legalise pot - then you can control the quality and tax it - leave it illegal and you get no tax and it costs an arm and a leg to police the underworld from making tax free income from it - it's not actually that hard to understand is it?

27/09/2011 11:48:03 a.m.

Tom wrote:

Another bud has left him, and you can probably Bank on the fact his other bud is feeling like he's been put in a very sticky situation and is getting nervous- as there's no way this new position will resonate with the people of Epsom. So soon he will have no buds, but his head is in the clouds so he won't quite know why. Although it's clear to the outside observer he's made a complete hash of it.

27/09/2011 11:01:32 a.m.

Peter wrote:

Duncan Garner, so called political expert, doesn't even seem to know the definition of Libertarian. In my view Journalism's official death-rattle just got louder.

27/09/2011 9:59:29 a.m.

Nicholas wrote:

The core of this issue is that ACT is divided between the theoretical Libertarians (Who view cannibis law from a purely monetary veiwpoint) and the 'Stiffer sentances for poor people' crowd who have an extremely shortsighted view on social issues. These two factions cannot reconcile their differences - hence ACT is not merely imploding but may have passed it's Schwarzschild Radius (i.e. turned into a black hole).

27/09/2011 9:30:32 a.m.

William J wrote:

An intelligent and inciteful post Duncan. Bang on!!! This is a crazy and confusing message for Act to send to its conservative right wing supporters. It doesn't matter what the policy is that Brash wants to introduce, if it strays completely away from the party's core values and doesn't have the full endorsement of the senior members of the party, then it's a death wish; and that goes for any political party that does this. The only person who comes out looking clever from this is John Boscawen who could obviously see this train wreck coming and got off at the first stop. Brash - Lesson No 1: Never contradict the core values of the party. Lesson No 2: Politics is a team effort - you can never get any traction on anything without the full support and endorsement of your leading members. Lesson No 3: Repeat Lesson No 1 & 2. P.S Loved the "He has no advisers, and if he does, he can't hear them." :)