Call for increased use of 1080

Print

Wed, 08 Jun 2011 7:48a.m. UPDATED: 12:25PM

The use of 1080 is controversial, and protests against it occur regularly

The use of 1080 is controversial, and protests against it occur regularly

By Dan Satherley, Ally Mullord and RadioLIVE staff

There's a claim that unless even more 1080 pesticide is used, New Zealand faces a future without many of its special plants and animals.

Environment Commissioner Dr Jan Wright has released a report into the controversial poison. It says 3.5 million kilograms of 1080 is dropped on New Zealand forests each year, killing pests such as possums, rats and stoats.

The poison's use has triggered emotional protests and calls for a ban, but Dr Wright believes 1080 poses a relatively small risk and even more of it should be used.

She says she seldom comes to such a strong conclusion at the end of an investigation, but UnitedFuture leader Peter Dunne has called it a "kick in the guts".

“1080 has been used in New Zealand since the 1950s," he says. "Most people recognise that after 50-odd years of fighting a losing battle it’s probably time to rethink your strategy."

Mr Dunne, who last year said UnitedFuture will push for a total 1080 ban after the November election, says with predatory pests still the major culprits of native bird population decline the Department of Conservation (DoC) must investigate alternatives.   

“We currently spend around $100 million a year on 1080 operations, mostly in and around communities who do not want it and have to suffer the consequences of having it.”

Mr Dunne says 1080 is “an extremely cruel and indiscriminate killer” and local communities need to be better empowered to contribute to pest control operations.

He says DoC currently spends less than $2 million a year on researching and developing alternatives and UnitedFuture is committed to “significantly increasing” that figure, and establishing “initiatives such as 1080-free pest control pilot programmes”.

He says DoC and other pest control agencies will contribute out of their existing 1080 budget. 

“No matter what DoC’s science says, spraying such an unpopular and deadly toxin over large tracts of our conservation estate, water catchments and farmland will never be accepted by those that reside in our provincial communities and see the devastation it causes.”

But Dr Wright says 1080 is the most effective weapon they have.

“There are other pest control methods that are more suitable than 1080 in certain circumstances but on much of our conservation land there is currently nothing else that will effectively kill possums, rats and stoats.

“While there may be an alternative to 1080 one day, if we want to keep our forests for future generations we simply cannot afford to stop using 1080. Time is not a luxury we have."

The Government has also welcomed the report.

“Our most challenging environmental problem is introduced pests such as possums, stoats and rats threatening the survival of our native species,” says Minister of Conservation Kate Wilkinson.

She also rejected Mr Dunne's claim 1080 cost the country $100 million a year.

 

“DOC spends $22 million on pest control each year and with 8 million hectares to look after it targets 1080 where it is needed most."

 

Conservation advocate Nicola Vallance hopes the report will help 1080 to be accepted as a critical weapon in the war against pests.

RadioLIVE / 3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

05 Jul 2011 12:26p.m.

Facts wrote:

1080 Cas No 62-74-8 Risk and Safety Data. 54/ Toxic to flora. 55/ Toxic to fauna. 56/ Toxic to soil organisms. 57/ Toxic to bees. Go and read it for yourself and then think about just how safe this Class A Poison really is.

12 Jun 2011 11:29a.m.

atrout wrote:

Given a few facts... the fauna which are being protected could not survive without massive intervention and that increasing 1080 use is likely to be hugely unpopular- why not step outside conventional thinking and let the protected birds be bred freely in captivity and a few mainland island sanctuaries and let the wild populations die out? Maybe we could go one step further into a rational view on native species and re-establish the Acclimatization Society, giving it a mandate to introduce more exotic species to roam free and multiply in NZ's bush. Tree pythons, pumas and so on in order to have a much more prolific wild environment. Eventually a natural order would establish itself. Hunters and tourists would be happy and we'd not see our conservation land dosed with tonnes of lethal poison on an unending basis. This would go over like a lead balloon for the purists but just maybe it is time to do something more practical and certainly more interesting. Think of the possibilities!

10 Jun 2011 08:58a.m.

Harry Abrahamson wrote:

FOR 1080 - without it theres no more money for you city people........farmers can't risk getting TB - just cause your guys like you native bush!!!!!

09 Jun 2011 05:02p.m.

ggg wrote:

@Margie..1080 does not control stoats...they are hunters, not scavangers.

09 Jun 2011 07:58a.m.

Margie wrote:

1080 horrible stuff, but unfortunately is the only viable treatment for the control of those vicious stoats and possums. Kiwi becoming so rare now, and apparently don't eat the 1080. Stoats & possums love kiwi eggs. They are still hunting for alternative ways of control, though. Please keep trying guys, and Good Luck with a more country/ animal friendly alternative.

09 Jun 2011 07:34a.m.

Grant wrote:

I hope this report covers the effects of 1080 on our plantlife. Little research has been done on this and with the dieback of cabbage trees and kauri, what effects does 1080 have on the plants themselves, or micro organisms that attack our plants?

09 Jun 2011 01:39a.m.

nick a wrote:

@Gazza Gazza Gazza you say "............what gives you the right to play God and decide what should live or die.
Evolution will take care of what survives" A, we already played god by bringing exotic species here that would have not otherwise got here B, yes evolution will decide...and maybe not in our favour.

08 Jun 2011 10:21p.m.

Mike wrote:

What a relief to finally have the 1080 facts so clearly and fully presented to NZers via Jan Wright's report released today. Peter Dunne and the anti-1080 lobbyists should put aside their vested interests for a moment and take some time to read the PCE report before fronting on TV. - In fact every NZer should read it. The report can be found at: http://www.pce.parliament.nz/publications/all-publications/evaluating-the-use-of-1080-predators-poisons-and-silent-forests/

08 Jun 2011 07:58p.m.

John wrote:

Doesn't is seem plain dumb to dump tons of poison in our forests when there is lots of controversy about the saftety of its use? In the mean time, we have many unemployed people and possum fur is the only excepted fur product on the fashion market... not to mention that it is great for many many other uses... oh it is so nice to the touch, so warm!!!! What dumbass came up with the idea to dump poison that kills other non targeted animals rather than use this resource we have as an industry to create tons of jobs? Excuse me while i go hit my head against a brick wall.

08 Jun 2011 01:51p.m.

Sam wrote:

I'm don't accept chronic total airborne chemical warfare is logical to support dairy exports. Is the decision fear, greed, or contempt of life based? Doesn't sound good. Please brainstorm alternatives