Cameron's land purchase fuels debate

Print

Thu, 02 Feb 2012 6:08p.m.

Cameron will reside in New Zealand with his family (AAP file)

Cameron will reside in New Zealand with his family (AAP file)

By Patrick Gower

Avatar director James Cameron says he is looking forward to making New Zealand his new home, but his dairy farm purchase – approved by Government after a promise Cameron would come and live here – has continued to fuel the political debate about foreign ownership.

The sale was approved because Cameron will “reside indefinitely” in the Wairarapa with his fifth wife, actress Suzi Amis, and their three primary-school-age children.

To meet the criteria, foreign buyers like Cameron need to have applied for a visa. They then have five years to become a resident, but there are no subsequent check-ups, just voluntary reporting.

New Zealand First leader Winston Peters says on that basis, “why not let half the world come… they could comply with that”.

Although Cameron is a committed environmentalist, under the Green Party’s policy the farms sale would be blocked.

Co-leader Russell Norman says while he “loved Avatar… James Cameron should become a resident before he buys land here”.

With two Avatar sequels to make, Cameron’s mere presence could be an economic bonanza – work on the first movie created 1500 jobs and an estimated $300 million for the economy.

So great is the potential benefit that the Prime Minister says “the fact that [Cameron] might live in New Zealand is an added bonus”.

He may not be able to milk cows, but he can certainly make movies – and that's a skill many would say we should be rolling out the red carpet for.

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

03 Feb 2012 12:52p.m.

cherie wrote:

Oh Please we all know the reason for this. The Crafar farms were bought by the Chinese. We are clearly being a bunch of racists

03 Feb 2012 01:08a.m.

Fellowes wrote:

The real problem has been missed in this debate, and that is that the rich have access to the land, shutting others out. We need to nationalise the land and turn it into community trusts so ALL people can share in it.

02 Feb 2012 07:31p.m.

Mat wrote:

The difference between this and the Crafar farms case is that James Cameron has already created a lot of work here, and his presence will probably mean he chooses to continue filming here after the Avatar sequels, and would likely choose to do his post production work here too. He is a wealthy individual, investing his money and giving NZ an economic boost, and later he or his descendants will sell the properties. The Crafar sale is to the Chinese government, who have tied up most of the product manufacturing of the world, and now want tie up food manufacturing as well. Once they have it, they will never give it up, and we have effectively reduced the available land in New Zealand for New Zealanders by the size of the Crafar farms. As Russell Norman said this morning, can you buy land off the Chinese Government?

02 Feb 2012 06:41p.m.

red herring wrote:

Can't understand any rational objection to this. He's a great guy that has contributed to NZ's economy substantially already. By all accounts he's planning to live here and will no doubt create more jobs here? What's a bigger deal is the way that overseas absentee owners buy trophy properties by skirting around the rules with well presented weasel worded applications, or claim a tenous relationship with a resident or local company to avoid application altogether.