• Full Story

Child abuse 'instruction manual' could be banned

Print

Wed, 24 Aug 2011 9:26a.m.

The book, To Train Up Your Child, advocates harsh punishment against children

The book, To Train Up Your Child, advocates harsh punishment against children

By Dan Satherley

A book written by Christian fundamentalists from the US that teaches parents how to beat their children could be banned.

The book, To Train Up A Child, is being investigated by Internal Affairs after a complaint was made last week.

The book promotes using weapons, thumping, smacking, hair pulling and even sitting on them in order to get children to obey – and insists the "conditioning" must cause physical pain.

Whitcoulls has removed the book from their website, but it is still available to purchase elsewhere.

The complaint was laid by an American child abuse victim, who said it was "irresponsible" to sell it in a country with such a high rate of child abuse.

"I'm not one to prevent books from being sold, but I think an instruction manual on how to enact violence on your child is a completely different story," he told Stuff.

The book could be banned outright, restricted or referred to the human rights or children's commissioners.

On Amazon.com, To Train Up A Child has almost twice as many one-star ratings than five-stars.

Written by Michael and Debi Pearl, the book has been linked to deaths of at least children in the US at the hands of their parents.

In 2010, a California couple was charged with murder and torture after beating their daughter to death with a 15-inch length of plastic. The abuse was sparked when the seven-year-old mispronounced a word in a children's story about a frog and a toad.

In 2006, a devotee of the book's authors suffocated their four-year-old with tight blankets after beating him with a plumbing line.

The book recommends not disciplining children in front of others, "even at church – nosy neighbours might call social workers".

Plumbing tools are listed as "real attention getters", and should be left around the house as a deterrent to bad behaviour.

The authors deny their book is a manual for child abuse, and based on "Amish" principles.

"Over 1,000,000 parents have applied these Biblical principles with joyful results," they said in a statement released after the seven-year-old's death last year.

The Perls have no qualifications in child development.

The book has made unlikely allies of former Green MP Sue Bradford, architect of the so-called 'anti-smacking law', and Bob McCoskrie, director of Family First which wants the law overturned.

Mr McCoskrie says a "light smack on the hand or the bottom" is fine, but the more extreme methods in the book were "completely wrong".

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

19 Nov 2011 01:15a.m.

Lucy McWhirter Browne wrote:

I quite often read literature that I do not agree with and believe in the freedom to publish. There has to be some boundaries however, for example books that promote terrorism and in this case child abuse. After hearing about To Train up a Child by Debi and Michael Pearl I wanted to read the book for myself so downloaded it (with their permission) onto my laptop. I was completely disgusted and shocked by these 2 people's complete lack of knowledge in child development and cruel training advice. When tiny babies of 6 months or so cry this is not misbehaviour it is how they communicate! To suggest that these young infants should be 'spanked' is completely wrong. I was interested in finding out more about these people so made a comment on their youtube channel- I was blocked and others who have questioned their teachings have also been blocked. Recently the Pearls sent out newsletters to all their 'followers' asking them to write positive comments about their book and to give it 5 stars on Amazon. I went onto their No Greater Joy website and read Michael Pearls story titled Butterflies and Back doors. He tells of how he repeatedly belted the legs of a 2 year old girl (not his own child) because she tried to go out the back door. He describes the girl's beauty and talks about his own larger body and how good it made him feel when she finally submitted to his authority. It was like a sick paedophille romance. Please sign the petition to have this book banned from sale on Amazon.

31 Aug 2011 06:55p.m.

Ngati Porou wrote:

Is it any wonder why our kids are being abused so much when there's still sick bastards out there that condone this behaviour? I pray that this couple is not allowed within 200 yards of a child. Why don't REAL Christians stand up to them?

31 Aug 2011 12:51a.m.

Davo wrote:

I smell an awful lot of hypocrisy in Mouthguard's comment. After all, in-group entitlement and out-group hatred seem to be the primary reasons why both National and ACT exist.

31 Aug 2011 12:43a.m.

Davo wrote:

While we're at it, let's ban everything Ayn Rand wrote - sociopaths shouldn't be given the time of day, let alone the right to devise and express an opinion of their own.

28 Aug 2011 07:49a.m.

Lindagail wrote:

I have not read this book, nor will I. I do not care to contribute financially to what I view as horrible ideas and people. I am a child abuse survivor who was beaten because of the "spare the rod, spoil the child" statement in the Bible.

How do you define the fine line between disciple and abuse in the minds of multitudes of parents who are in the throes of their most angry and frustrating moments? I know people say not to discipline children in anger, but that is not what happens in the real world. In the real world, 5 children die every day in the United States at the hands of their parents / caretakers from abuse and neglect. Were I to hit and cause pain to an adult, I would be arrested for assault, with all the support and power of our police and court system. Why then should I be allowed to hit and cause pain to a child?

26 Aug 2011 09:23a.m.

Ricardo wrote:

I suspect that like most over sensationalised news stories that end up in the news that this is totally out of proportion to the overall messages contained within the book. But hey, why let facts get in the road of a good story. Journalism gets trashier by the day. I haven't read the book, but in order for anyone to really comment I suggest they should. Thanks to Labour and the Greens there are now NO consequences for kids that get out of control. Roll on the English riots here.

25 Aug 2011 12:19p.m.

Mouthguard wrote:

While we are at it, let's ban the Quran and the Bible too. Two more odious handbooks for out-group hatred and in-group entitlement you are unlikely to find. They make this book look like Dr Seuss. The things people justify in terms of a delusion that god exists...

25 Aug 2011 12:02p.m.

Sally Giffney wrote:

This book is most certainly outragous! And this comment is coming from someone who was beaten a lot as a child. Inflicting pain is NOT a good form of discipline. It also teaches the child to fear all forms of pain, including girls growing up to fear the pain of having children of their own.

25 Aug 2011 09:59a.m.

Lyle Goble wrote:

Why is it so hard for you to believe that it's not right to TRAIN or DISCIPLINE a child. If you believe in evolution this shouldn't be such a far-fetched idea.

25 Aug 2011 09:59a.m.

Lyle Goble wrote:

Why is it so hard for you to believe that it's not right to TRAIN or DISCIPLINE a child. If you believe in evolution this shouldn't be such a far-fetched idea.