3News » Home
Full Story

Chile quake showed RNZ importance – protester

9 comments | Post Comment email Email printer friendly Print    Text Size:
aA
aA
aA
A crowd gathers in Auckland to help protest funding cuts to public broadcaster Radio New Zealand (Credit: Chris Whitworth)

A crowd gathers in Auckland to help protest funding cuts to public broadcaster Radio New Zealand (Credit: Chris Whitworth)

Mon, 01 Mar 2010 4:16p.m.

By Chris Whitworth

The organiser of a Radio New Zealand protest in Auckland today says the Chile quake and subsequent tsunami warnings were a key reminder of the importance of RNZ broadcasts.

More than 60 people gathered in Auckland’s Hobson St at midday, as social commentators and university tutors expressed outrage at the Government’s proposed funding cuts to RNZ.

“Let’s not let the sharks bite Radio NZ!” was protest organiser and founder of the Facebook group ‘Save Radio New Zealand’ Jake Quinn’s closing statement to the crowd.

He says the Government is testing the waters with “nibbles” at RNZ and if the nation doesn’t react they risk a major blow to democracy.

Broadcasting Minister Jonathan Coleman announced last week that RNZ had to deliver cost-cutting measures.

Mr Coleman said this included the station’s board reviewing staffing numbers, sponsorship arrangements and studio budgets.

Mr Quinn says the Broadcasting Minister doesn’t share the same respect for public broadcasting as the general public.

He says RNZ proved its worth on the weekend, with the nation turning to the station for regular Civil Defence warnings every five minutes. 

“It’s not like on TV where you’ve got a news bulletin at the top of the hour," he says.

“Radio New Zealand is the official Civil Defence broadcaster for New Zealand, that’s just another reason why it’s so important to keep them running and operational.”

The Auckland protest saw a reduced crowd compared with the 130-strong protest in the capital last week.

Mr Quinn says his Facebook support group has grown exponentially, boasting more than 16,000 members. He says the challenge now is reaching people who aren’t online.

“We don’t really mind if our group doesn’t get noticed. If people are talking about Radio New Zealand and the pressure is on the Government not to do anything silly with it, then mission accomplished.”

The protest saw an intentional lack of political presence, with social commentators and university lecturers making up the selection of speakers.

“Auckland is less interested in hearing politicians talk in my opinion and more interested in local people,” says Mr Quinn.

Political commentator Chris Trotter gave an impassioned speech saying RNZ was a hole in the system that allowed the light to shine through. 

He says the station is an important alternative to commercial radio.

“Radio NZ is an icon for all New Zealanders, not just liberal lefties,” he says. “I think it links us all together without the intrusion of commercial radio.”

Auckland University of Technology journalism lecturer Martin Hirst spoke at the protest, denouncing claims that the public shouldn’t have to pay for RNZ when they get commercial media for free.

He says the argument is false as the whole of New Zealand pay for commercial media in their daily transactions that carry hidden taxes.

“We're already paying for it [commercial broadcasting] in the little transactions we make each day... We’re paying for it whether we listen or not."

RNZ costs taxpayers around $34 million a year but that looks set to change. Today’s protests in Auckland asked the simple question: at what cost?

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Comments [9]

Lightseed
01 Mar 2010 11:18p.m.

Emma, the government hasn't suggested anything, what they have done is ask the people running radio nz to come up with ways to stay with the current budget and then to take those plans to the govt, the govt has made no suggestion. Martin Hirst, surely you have the ability to understand the difference between a commercial radio and one that is fully funded by the tax payer? no wonder our educated youth are struggling with people like you teaching them. The marketing budget for radio advertising is paid for the company by the profits they set aside for such, which is completely different from the public funded tax radio for which the public money is not being used. I can only hope there are far better idiots at the university teaching students than you.

Tony Green
01 Mar 2010 11:12p.m.

The report underestimates the numbers present, so that it is made to appear as if the numbers are decreasing, since the Wellington protest. It also muddles up the question of political interests. Although the Save Radio New Zealand Facebook group is , as its founder says, not politically aligned, there was one speaker each from the Labour Party and the Green Party. The points raised in comments here have been discussed at length on the Save Radio NZ Facebook discussion pages. I suggest people commenting here should read that first.

Martin Hirst
01 Mar 2010 7:20p.m.

Hi Chris, great that you're covering this for TV3. I just wanted to add a little to the quote you have from me. My point is that we pay for commercial broadcasting through advertising. That's a cost to the consumer that we don't see. The marketing budget for every company that sells goods and services to the public is paid for by a 'tax' on all units sold. So, commercial broadcasting is not free.

H Bell
01 Mar 2010 7:00p.m.

Bizo - even if some other stations were broadcasting about the tsunami, no one - and I mean no other radio or TV station - had back-to-back coverage from 7-11am - thats a 4hr Morning Report special keeping everyone updated with the tsunami's progress (including the other media as well probably)
Katrina, in case you're interested (although I bet you aren't) you'll find all of RNZ's frequencies (for National, Concert and Parliament) online at http://www.radionz.co.nz/listen/amfm . That website won best radio website (ahead of the commercial stations) at last year's Radio Awards. RNZ National won Station of the Year at the same awards. RNZ has a lot to offer everyone.

Emma
01 Mar 2010 6:49p.m.

RNZ is already operating on a very limited budget - as last year's KPMG report on it showed - this might be why more money hasn't been spent advertising its frequency, which could be a very useful thing to do so that people like Katrina know where to find it. Bizo, this debate isn't silly - the government has suggested introducing commercial sponsorship and measures that could result in RNZ becoming unavailable at certain times and on the FM frequency. These would be drastic changes that would mean NZ no longer had one public service broadcaster on which citizens could rely for truly independent reporting.

Lightseed
01 Mar 2010 6:46p.m.

Should a radio network who is 100% government funded, no advertising, be spending money sponsoring events?

Democracy
01 Mar 2010 6:39p.m.

Katrina, listening to intelligent radio for a change might help with your poor literacy.
Bizo...erm...almost 17,000 people care (and counting). That's kinda' the point. Idiot!

katrina
01 Mar 2010 5:59p.m.

Wouldn't even know what frequency to find RNZ so certainly didn't turn to the for updates on the weekend

Bizo
01 Mar 2010 4:49p.m.

Interesting debate. However, a bit silly really. It's not like the Govt is axing the station completely, its just cutting back. RNZ isn't the only radio station - other stations were broadcasting warnings about the tsunami too. Some of the fat cats could probably take a pay cut I reckon. In essence - who cares if RNZ is getting funding cuts???

Post a comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide here
Name:
Email: (Won't be published)
Comment:



3News Video 3News Audio