3News » Home
Full Story

China-US tensions over Taiwan, Dalai Lama

4 comments | Post Comment email Email printer friendly Print    Text Size:
aA
aA
aA
Dalai Lama

Dalai Lama

Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:34a.m.

By Christopher Bodeen

China is pledging to retaliate against the US over arms sales to Taiwan and warning of further damage to ties if President Barack Obama meets the Dalai Lama.

There's likely to be even more turbulence ahead: Trade friction, currency rate woes and allegations of cyber-spying are already roiling relations.

The rhetoric also is sharpening in a disagreement over new sanctions against Iran, with Beijing refusing US calls to push Tehran harder to cooperate with nuclear inspectors.

Yet the sheer number and variety of current disputes also reflects a newly combative approach by Beijing, emboldened by its $2.4 trillion in foreign holdings - about $800 billion of which is invested in US Treasury securities - and relative success handling the impact of the global financial crisis.

A tough line is essential for the communist leadership that places a premium on being deemed by the deeply nationalist public to be "tough enough to defend China in a dangerous world," said John Garver, an expert on Chinese foreign policy at Georgia Tech.

Since the 2008 financial crisis, Beijing has concluded that the world's developed democracies "are badly wounded and therefore a healthy and growing China can now impose its will all over the world," said Edward Friedman, a China specialist at the University of Wisconsin, Madison.

"It therefore has become more assertive and uncompromising and self-confident, such that its actions seem arrogant to many," Friedman said.

Washington is looking to Beijing to help finance its stimulus spending by continuing to recycle its trade surpluses into buying Treasury securities and other government debt. While China has reduced such purchases as a hedge, they remain a force keeping US interest rates low and the sluggish economy moving.

"The fact that Beijing is Washington's banker is not lost on the Chinese government," said Oxford University China scholar Steve Tsang.

Tensions have also been raised in recent weeks over US comments on Internet freedom and a dispute between the Chinese government and Google Inc., which said it might pull out of China over censorship and cyber attacks on dissidents originating from within the country.

Google says it's no longer willing to acquiesce to the Chinese government's demands for censored search results, yet it still wants access to the country's engineering talent and steadily growing online advertising and mobile phone markets.

For their part, Chinese leaders are determined to control the flow of information, and state media has portrayed Google's complaints as part of a US government-sponsored campaign of "information imperialism."

Speaking Tuesday at a regularly scheduled news conference, Foreign Ministry spokesman Ma Zhaoxu reiterated China's anger over Washington's $6.4 billion Taiwan weapons package announced over the weekend, but offered no new details on threatened sanctions against the US companies involved.

China claims Taiwan as its own territory and regards arms sales to the self-governing island democracy as a violation of its sovereignty. China said Saturday it was suspending military exchanges in response to the sale and could take further unspecified action.

The suspension follows the model employed in similar spats in past years. What's new this time is Beijing's threat to punish U.S. companies that make the weapons involved, among them Boeing Co., United Technologies Corp., Lockheed Martin Corp. and Raytheon Co.

A US defence official said China shouldn't have been surprised by the arms sale and criticized Beijing's response.

"I think it's unfortunate that China has reacted the way it has," Bruce Lemkin, a deputy undersecretary with the US Air Force, said at an air show in Singapore.

On Tuesday, another Chinese official warned that an Obama meeting with the Dalai Lama would "seriously undermine the political foundation" of China-U.S. relations."

The warning from Zhu Weiqun, a Chinese participant in weekend talks with the Dalai Lama's representatives, follows signals from US officials in recent weeks that Obama might soon meet the exiled Tibetan leader - something Chinese officials are keen to avoid before President Hu Jintao travels to Washington, possibly in April.

Zhu did not give any details on what China would do if Obama meets the Dalai Lama, simply saying: "We will take corresponding measures to make the relevant countries realize their mistakes."

China maintains that Tibet has been part of its territory for centuries, but many Tibetans say the region was functionally independent for much of its history.

China has significant leverage on key foreign policy issues such as Iran because of its veto power in the UN Security Council.

At Tuesday's news conference, the Foreign Ministry's Ma fired back at comments by US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton that China should consider the long-term implications of Iran developing nuclear weapons.

"I believe there is no basis for such remarks," Ma said.

Speaking last week in Paris, Clinton said she and others who support additional sanctions on Iran over its disputed nuclear program are lobbying China to back new UN penalties on the Iranian government.

Much of that unwillingness is driven by China's desire to preserve its growing economic relationship with Iran, now the China's third-largest supplier of oil and a growing destination for Chinese investment.

However, Beijing's opposition also reflects its unwillingness to help Washington win a diplomatic victory and hopes to see it bogged down in yet another Middle Eastern quagmire, Garver said.

"From the Chinese perspective, Iranian acquisition of nuclear weapons is less injurious to China's interests than US success in bludgeoning Iran into submission," he said.

While China's more muscular diplomacy is doubtless popular at home, it carries the risk that Beijing could overplay its hand and spark a backlash among foreign critics, analysts said.

Just how much leverage Beijing has remains unclear: An attempt to use its US Treasury holdings to pressure Washington could boomerang if that leads, as many speculate it would, to a rise in the value of the Chinese currency that US critics say is deliberately undervalued to boost exports.

AP

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Comments [4]

Sall
04 Feb 2010 1:15a.m.

Dan, it was never "China wants this, China wants that". It was the United States that wants China to appreciate its currency, wants China to help on issues like North Korea/Iran and others. In my opinion, I think this world has had enough of US being so bossy. Saying Tibet does not belong to China is like saying Alaska doesn't belong to the US or Tasmania doesn't belong to Australia. Besides that, many places in the world are acquired by force if you look at history. Look at US, how many countries did it invaded in the past hundred years? If there are too many countries that hold veto powers, UN couldn't function. Any one country that uses it's veto power will make any proposals useless.

Sam
03 Feb 2010 4:08p.m.

Relax Dan, I dont know why you think China is a threat to the world, also China isnt trying to run the world. All the recent conflicts are just purely gestures from all sides. Obama wants China to raise currency and needs China's help on issues such as Iran, but Obama's only cards in his hands are Human rights, Tibet issue, and Taiwan issue, now Obama played them, and ofcourse the Chinese leaders responded. For example, everyone knows the weapon sales makes no difference, Taiwan's leader would never declare independence, not even the "pro-independence" ones such as Chen ShuiBian/Li DengHui, so Mainland China would never attack, therefore these weapons would never be used. Obama sold them for "Taiwan-independence" lobby groups in USA, Ma YingJiu brought them for the sake of saying "Beijing isnt Ruleing", and ofcourse the Chinese Government has to respond. About Tibet, Tibet was a part of China in the Yuan and Qing(most recent) dynasty.

Samantha
03 Feb 2010 1:14p.m.

"From the Chinese perspective, Iranian acquisition of nuclear weapons is less injurious to China's interests than US success in bludgeoning Iran into submission," he said. How are they any different from the americans??? Zhu did not give any details on what China would do if Obama meets the Dalai Lama, simply saying: "We will take corresponding measures to make the relevant countries realize their mistakes." It's stupid, America tries to stop other countries from gain nuclear weapons yet holds on to their own while doing it. Frankly its an abomination and no such weapons should be needed ever and China is just like a high school kid having a tantrum, sure enough they label the Dalai lama as a terrorist and a criminal but China hasn't exactly been honest in the past and tried to hide things especially from the rest of the world. Fair enough each country has it's problems to be fixed but hiding it and denying it out of pride is never going to fix it and other critisizing all the time when they are no better isnt going to help the situation either. Loose the pride, show a bit of honesty and try to understand even if you can't agree. We shouldn't be pointing fingers at who is worse right now, what this world needs is leaders willing to look at the problems and work with others to fix them. We are all humans last time I checked countries like China and USA need to loose their superiority complexes and star helping each other as equals and it's the same for the rest of the world.

Dan
03 Feb 2010 12:52p.m.

I think this world has had enough of "China wants this, China wants that". So what if they have the highest population numbers. We do not toe their whims and fancies. U.S. as the largest economy should not bow down to pressure from them as this will send a wrong message. Tibet was never a part of China, the history is a contradictory one as claimed by China. Tibet was a sort of Neutral territory always and was left in peace due to the religious lifestyles led. The roof of the world was never a part of China. They have acquired it by force. I think it is high time the UN security council started providing more power and veto rights to countries like India and some such others to create a balance of power position in today's world. China can be deterred only if they have a sizeable opponent.

Post a comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide here
Name:
Email: (Won't be published)
Comment:



3News Video 3News Audio

Post your opinion