Chinese bid for Crafar Farms accepted

Print

Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:25a.m.

The bid for Crafar Farms was recommended by the OIO

The bid for Crafar Farms was recommended by the OIO

By James Murray

A bid for Crafar Farms by the Chinese Shang Hai Pengxin Group Co. Limited has been accepted by Land Information Minister Maurice Williamson and Associate Minister of Finance Dr Jonathan Coleman.

The move follows the recommendation of the Overseas Investment Office (OIO) to grant consent.

"It is clear that all criteria under sections 16 and 18 of the Overseas Investment Act 2005 have been met, therefore we accept the recommendation of the OIO to grant consent," Mr Williamson said.

The 16 farms will be bought by Milk New Zealand Holding Limited, a subsidiary of Shanghai Pengxin.

Pengxin is owned by Nangtong Yingxin Investments, a Chinese company owned 99 percent by Zhaobai Jiang, reportedly the richest man in China.

The OIO decision says Zhaobai Jiang does not want to build or own milk processing plans but may invest with joint venture partners in expanding capacity, and intends to increase production at the Crafar farms through heavy investment in the first two years.

According to the Government, the acquisition will “further support the supply of high quality dairy products into the Chinese market and help set the foundations for further economic and export opportunities with China”.

The decision to grant consent is controversial with a New Zealand-owned bid by a Sir Michael Fay-led consortium currently going through a court process seeking to block the sale.

They were in court yesterday but no orders were given as the two sides had reached agreement on three issues.

Belly Gully lawyer David Cooper, representing the Fay consortium, said the application for approval had been provided to his client and the OIO's recommendation made to the ministers would be made available when the decision was made.

It had been agreed with Pengxin's Milk New Zealand Holdings that it would not take steps to settle the transaction before 5pm on Friday, February 3.

The Fay consortium still intends to seek a judicial review if the Chinese consortium gets approval.

However, The $171.5 million bid from the Fay-led consortium, including Maori trusts, is believed to be some $30 million below Pengxin's bid.

The Fay group had its bid for the farms declined by receiver KordaMentha, who called the price "unacceptable".

Mr Coleman and Mr Williamson pointed out that neither they or the OIO were involved in the decision by KordaMentha to not approve the Michael Fay bid.

They declined to comment on the bid as it is currently a matter before the court.

The New Zealand public have been widely reported as being against the sale of the farm to the Chinese with UMR poll last November showed 82 percent of respondents as being against the sale to Pengxin.

However, the same poll did show support for a sale which entailed combined Chinese and New Zealand interests.

As part of the deal Milk New Zealand has agreed that the farms will be managed by Landcorp Farming Limited.

The Government hope this will guarantee expected benefits to the New Zealand economy from the sale to occur.

If Milk New Zealand renege on the deal to use Landcorp they will be require to sell the farms as part of the consent.

Shanghai Pengxin have been granted consent under the following conditions:

  • The individuals with control of Milk New Zealand must continue to be of good character
  • Milk New Zealand must invest a minimum of NZD $14m in the properties to make them more economically and environmentally sustainable
  • Milk New Zealand and their associates must not acquire an ownership or control interest in milk processing facilities in New Zealand unless a 50% or more ownership or control interest in those facilities is held by non-overseas persons
  • Milk New Zealand must establish an on-farm training facility for dairy farm workers and must meet the capital cost of establishing this facility
  • Milk New Zealand must give two scholarships of not less than NZD $5,000 each year to students of the on-farm training facility with the first two scholarships to be awarded by 31 December 2013
  • Milk New Zealand must use reasonable endeavours to assist Landcorp to extend its business to, and market its products, in China Milk New Zealand must provide public walking access over Benneydale Farm and Taharua Station, in consultation with the Department of Conservation  and the New Zealand Walking Access Commission
  • Milk New Zealand must take reasonable steps to protect and enhance existing areas of significant indigenous vegetation and significant habitats of indigenous fauna and flora on the properties
  • Milk New Zealand must register a heritage covenant in respect of the Te Ruaki pa site on Tiwhaiti Farm
  • If required by the Office of Treaty Settlements, the Applicant must transfer the Nga Herenga pa site (approximately 1.6ha located on Benneydale Farm) to the Crown for nil consideration.

Read the OIO’s recommendation

Read the OIO’s decision summary 

OIO background information

3 News

 

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

25 Apr 2012 07:59p.m.

Dale Jessop wrote:

These farmes will be operated totally by Chinese, you only have to look at the business in NZ now that are own by chinese, their workers are all chinese, In Tauranga they own Cafes, and the New Zealands that worked in these cafes have been replaced by chinese staff, why dont your reporters have a good look around, Tea Gardens have a look.

28 Jan 2012 01:52p.m.

Scott wrote:

Just ask The Fay consortium to increase their bid by $30m and the problem sorted! I really hope people can put their money where their mouth is.

27 Jan 2012 10:07p.m.

Greg wrote:

@Proudcofusedkiwinationalist: You can be as confused as you want, but my Great Grandparents didn't fight in the world wars so that we could just be bought. They fought for our land, and now it's just been sold to the highest bidder, meaning NZers will have to pay the world price for what they fought for. There are unbound amounts of money in China and they can buy us and sell us many times over. It surprises me the veterans aren't storming out of their graves.

27 Jan 2012 09:22p.m.

Proud confused kiwi nationalist. wrote:

Who is 'us' and 'we'? How did Crafar farms become 'our' land? Can I decide if a South Islander can sell land to a North Islander buyer, after all that would involve an 'offshore' buyer! I will tell you what..."I'm sick of 'foreign' Aucklanders buying up Taranaki farmland, turning us into tenants in 'our' own land and taking the profits across the Bombay Hills! I'm sick of this 'rort' of royalties from the Maui Oil and Gas field as well as other Taranaki oil and gas ventures being sucked out of Taranaki by the 'New Zealand' government in Wellington to be spent on foreign projects like Transmission Gully and Auckland's proposed rail loop. New Plymouth needs a new bridge across the Waiwhakaiho River for goodness sake - yet all the profits are sucked out of Taranaki by a RORT committed by foreign Auckland and Wellington interests! What has 'Free Trade' and 'foreign investment' between the NZ provinces done for any of us! That's right made us all poorer! As you can see, I'm true to my principles - I take the anti -free trade / anti-foreigners argument to its logical conclusion. In fact I think St Heliers should put up tariffs against Ponsonby Ice Creams - come on guys where is yah St Heliers national pride! Don't allow those foreigners in Ponsonby to undercut you with their low wages!"

27 Jan 2012 08:13p.m.

Bruce wrote:

John Key Not only are you selling of S.O.ES, you and your cronies are now going to sell off New Zealand one piece at a time. How can you betray your own country to sell it off to the Chinese? A sound New Zealand bit has been placed by a consortium of New Zealanders, You can see your true colours coming through from you time as a trader, profit at any price! If you allow this to go on then you are lower that the scum on by shoe. SHAME ON YOU and your old crons. Australia watch out here come another 53,000

27 Jan 2012 07:17p.m.

ivan wrote:

I believe the farms should have been sold individually to NZ citizens, nothing to do with race i believe land is precious and shouldnt be thrown away like this. John you can giftwrap the politics however you want and stop using the economy as an excuse for the sale. Our PM is a used car salesman in disguise, and we the public were fooled again by this smilin assasin

27 Jan 2012 07:01p.m.

Devo wrote:

Correct me if Im wrong but why would they feed their own people, wouldn't they just export the milk to gain maximum profit?
I cannot believe NZ has not protected ourselves and we have not been proactive towards this situation occuring. There goes my chance of buying a farm and retiring.

27 Jan 2012 03:31p.m.

LBV wrote:

@mike - I would be more than happy to put money in to invest in keeping land in NZers hands. - Unfortunately I am unable to afford much. The problem is that most NZers do not have millions to spend.

27 Jan 2012 01:52p.m.

Greg wrote:

Mike there is a difference between racism and nationalism. Clearly patriotism is a concept you've completely lost.

27 Jan 2012 01:42p.m.

Mike wrote:

All the left leaners full of bigotry are all ready to complain, but not one of them was prepared to reach in their own pocket for as much as $1 to help keep the land in NZ hands.

That includes David Shearer and Winnie Peters!

At the end of the day, the difference between a loan and land title is only a piece of paper - both lose control of the asset. If a loan is not repaid, then that basically equates to lost title. The loan also restrict what you can do with the land like if you had sold it. Just in NZ we are used to banks who dont like land assets, so when a loan is defaulted they chose to sell land for the loan defaulters. So there is no real difference between sale and loans against the asset.

As for the Chinese using Chinese to work the land? Pure racist comments of bigots. Any employee earning in NZ has to pay NZ taxes, including Chinese nationals with WORK PERMITS. Those Chinese would also be spending in NZ. They will also be hiring NZ'rs for expertise and using NZ support industries. We may even see China export cheaper equipment into NZ for added competition. Its only racist bigots who will blindly claim that NZ gets nothing from it. What about the roughly $40 mil more being paid for the farms more than NZ could come up with, and how much of Michael Fay's consortium was overseas funded, ie not NZ at all!

It is actually the left leaning bigots at fault for the farms being sold to the Chinese in the first place as they made such a mess of the situation the Crafars had enough and sold up.

If those racist bigots had NZ freedoms/welfare and were in China, they would be complaining about China spending $200 mil of their welfare dollars on captialist adventures in NZ. George Bernard Shaw said 'Those that can, do. Those that can't, teach.' Today its more 'Those that can, do. those that can't, preach.' just like the several milion kiwis who won't get off their butts to improve anything in NZ and just whine continuly about everything.