Clayton Cosgrove at centre of political row

Print

Clayton Cosgrove at centre of political row

3News NZ

It's not unusual for constituents to seek help from their MPs, and it's certainly not unusual for MPs to try to help them out.

But when political donations become involved, questions then start to be asked.

Natasha Smith reports on a 22-hectare property in Christchurch that's at the centre of a political row.

Watch the video for her full report.

Update:

The Nation did speak to Independent Fisheries.

At first they declined our request for an interview and sent us a statement from their lawyer.

In response to our questions about their donation to Clayton Cosgrove, Pru Steven said any allegations that her client's interests were promoted by an MP in return for large donations "would be false".

Further, she threatened court action if we went ahead with our story.

Then Friday afternoon we got a statement from Mike Dormer at Independent Fisheries who was prepared to give us some answers despite his legal advice.

First, he pointed out that Independent Fisheries started discussing the issue of land near Christchurch Airport with Clayton Cosgrove in 2008 with a large number of other landowners.

Second, he said the Christchurch Airport Protection Bill was not initiated by Independent Fisheries, nor did it make any payments to Clayton Cosgrove in connection to the bill.

Independent Fisheries also told us it has a long history of funding political parties, and doesn't put any preconditions on funding support and no preconditions were placed on the support provided to Clayton Cosgrove's campaign.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

7/07/2012 11:13:46 p.m.

Brent wrote:

@IRASCIBLE. Bah ha ha ha, Mate, you need to read your comment again,The National Party burying donations in trusts, That's Funny,

7/07/2012 5:37:06 p.m.

I hate Labour wrote:

Labour are corrupt to the core.

7/07/2012 3:16:59 p.m.

Irascible wrote:

Crosgrove demonstrated integrity and honesty in the face of a reporter determined to create a scandal where none existed.Unlike Banks with his attempts to hide $50,000 of donations from Dotcom and $15000 from the casino and the National Party burying donations in trusts Crosgrove has been transparent and honest about his finances. I agree, The fingers of Brownlee in this bit of muck raking are obvious.

7/07/2012 2:21:10 p.m.

Kim wrote:

Contrast this with the Banks saga. Clear answers and an open book, to um..yea..no..dunno..i forgot. I know who i'd trust.