• Full Story

Clayton Weatherston to appeal conviction

Print

Tue, 13 Oct 2009 2:57p.m.

Clayton Weatherston

Clayton Weatherston

By Angela Beswick 
 
Clayton Weatherston is appealing his conviction for the murder of Sophie Elliott.
 
The 33-year-old former Otago University tutor was found guilty of the murder of his former student and girlfriend after a month long trial. Weatherston stabbed Miss Elliott over 200 times in her own bedroom, mutilating her body, in January 2008.
 
He was given a life stenence with a minimum non-parole period of 18 years last month.
 
A Court of Appeal spokeswoman confirmed to Newstalk ZB that Weatherston's lawyers have today lodged an appeal against the conviction, The Press reported.

Weatherston's sister Angela Muir had previously said her brother would not appeal his sentence.
 
On the day of his sentencing, Weatherston’s lawyer, Judith Ablett Kerr QC told Christchurch High Court her client was sorry.

“He tells me he is sorry,” she said. “He saw no point in saying it himself as it would appear contrived.”

Ms Ablett Kerr said that Weatherston told her, “people don’t see me in my cell at two in the morning when I think about the horrendous thing that occurred.”

Whilst reading a victim impact statement at his sentencing, Miss Elliott’s father Gilbert described Weatherston as “the epitome of evil”.

Sophie’s mother Lesley Elliott said she hoped Weatherston could “hear her screams of agony ring in (his ears) as they do in mine.”

Throughout the trial Weatherston said he would admit a charge of manslaughter, not murder, with the defence claiming provocation.
 
3 News
Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

12 Apr 2011 08:29p.m.

Anonymous wrote:

Law in this country is absolutly screwed, the death penalty is needed, not to be over used but to be put in place for cases with this depth of insanity. We cant have people like Weatherston in society. So many people, so many families emigrate to New Zealand to escape the troubles and threats in their home countries. New Zealand should atleast try to keep it as safe as possible by enforcingthe law and adjusting it with harsher punishment.

21 Dec 2009 09:36p.m.

helen hayes wrote:

As I come from Australia, I confess that I am less close than the rest of you to what has happened. Nonetheless, I can't help feeling that a significant psychiatric condition has been missed or played down, and should be properly investigated. I am completing a law degree at Adelaide university in South australia. I am a mother of teenagers and I confess there are days I have fantasies about doing some pretty horrible things to them, but to carry through suggests to me a practical abnormality that hasn't been given proper credit - helen hayes.

16 Oct 2009 12:13a.m.

Urban Druid wrote:

He can appeal. That is Mr. Weatherston's right. I doubt that he'll get anywhere, but then again, I am not privy to the nature of his considered legal arguement. Let's not get our knickers in a twist about it in any event. Twisted knickers will not alter the court's decision, nor the outcome for Mr. Weatherston. We actually have a choice about how we choose to feel in situations like this. Indignation, anger, hatred, will not change any of the actions that have preceeded what has happened in this case, just leave "you" feeling bad.

14 Oct 2009 10:45p.m.

Steph wrote:

Must we really be expected to pay for Sophie and her family to be put on trial once again? Hang Clayton high "and then we can all get some sleep".

14 Oct 2009 04:41p.m.

Huang wrote:

Legal aid should not cover appeals.

13 Oct 2009 09:57p.m.

annon wrote:

Appeal yes please, we all need to see this man again to remind us of how morally bankrupt our society is. If we had any morals as a society we would have the death penalty instead of some liberal bullshit system where we think that rehabilitation really works. I say execute all murderers, and remove all human right to all convicts NOW! Otherwise stop the drivel about the rights YOU have given this person.

13 Oct 2009 06:45p.m.

Jared wrote:

He's just so...ugly. The only thing 'appeal-ing' about any of this, is the prospect of that swine having his request turned down without delay. If his appeal is successful in ANY respect, then I think that serious questions will need to be asked of the powers that be. I don't care if he doesn't have a criminal history prior to this offence. He committed an abhorrent crime, and he doesn't deserve mercy, nor should he be allowed another chance to victimise the Elliotts. NO NO NO TO AN APPEAL!

13 Oct 2009 05:50p.m.

Trevor wrote:

It's high time that we follow the lead of the UK and add the appeal time to end of the sentence. This has worked at discouraging people from lodging appears as a matter of course when they are found guilty.

13 Oct 2009 05:41p.m.

John Robb wrote:

Surely this must be the most frivolous appeal ever and hopefully the Court of Appeal will turn it down.
It will be purgatory for Sophie Elliot's family and the people of NZ to sit through another five days of this sociopath destroying Sophie's character on the stand.
If it does go ahead hopefully at the conclusion he will be given a sentence that truly reflects the family and society's abhorrence of his actions.

13 Oct 2009 04:06p.m.

cherie wrote:

Who pays for this sorry arse to do this.
What a joke.
Ms Kerr said he said he was sorry.
Sorry my arse.
Sorry he was caught and convicted