• Full Story

Coalition parties are worm killers - blog

Print

Mon, 21 Nov 2011 9:44p.m.

John Campbell hosted TV3's leaders debate

John Campbell hosted TV3's leaders debate

Opinion by Patrick Gower

What really made the worm really turn?

Talk of the potential coalition partners - ACT for National, and NZ First for Labour; the mere mention of these crews and the worm started to head for middle earth.The coalition partners on either side of the major parties are worm killers.

It seems the room full of undecided voters don't like Winston or Don Brash. The worm started flatlining when talk turned to John Key's dirty deals in Epsom with ACT and Ohariu with Peter Dunne (he's got a party called United Future).

It goes to show both Key and Goff are defending the indefensible. I will say this though - if Peters does the Lazarus, he'll do it with a moral victory over ACT - he'll get over 5%, but ACT will only get in through the Epsom deal.

Goff was calling out Key as "donkey deep" with ACT and "breathing life" into them tonight, actually batting away Key's attack on Labour working with NZ First pretty well by using ACT.

It’s almost a double-negative - they cancel each other out. Put it this way I just looked at my notes and saw the words "rogue political entity" - now I can't remember if that was Key talking about Winston or Goff talking about ACT.

Key was honest when he said all he cared about ACT was that they were stable voting partners - not that all their MPs had quit, including one for stealing a dead infant's passport.

Key has also been bagging Goff for potentially working with Hone Harawira - but Goff pointed out tonight that Key had Harawira in his Government while he was part of the Maori Party.

Then Goff doubles down and says he has ruled out working with Harawira (although no one believes they wouldn't come to some kind of arrangement if it came to the crunch).

Another worm turner was asset sales – the worm went through the roof when Goff talked about how many New Zealand families couldn't afford the shares Key says will go to "Mum's and Dads". I think Key's explanation of the case for selling them was the best I've heard since he announced it at the start of the year.

But Goff was strong on asset sales tonight – it’s almost all he's got left. The question is whether this issue can get people out to vote.

It was interesting what Goff didn't talk about.

We didn't hear the words Capital Gains Tax or Compulsory Superannuation all night. Goff did well without them coming up - Labour has obviously decided this policy platform is a weakness.

Key only slipped in attack lines about these once tonight, I'd expect his strategists to bring it up a lot more in the coming days now they've seen Goff’s approach.

So Phil Goff got a bit of a boost from the worm. That's got to bit a bit of a coup for Goff, we all know he hasn't been getting much luck elsewhere.

In that early sparring, the worm was all for Goff - it seemed like he could say "I secretly wanted France to win the Rugby World Cup" and it would go up. Some are saying this debate was a draw - but I give a points victory to Goff.

John Key tried to blind Goff with spreadsheets early on. We know Key has got it all over Goff on numbers, but Goff had a counter-punch. He told a few yarns, he gave a bit of a commentary.

Yarns beat numbers on the day. Key's strategists might be telling him to tell a few more yarns now too. I thought Goff got it right on the underclass - that's a big issue and one that we aren't talking about enough.

Goff talked about what the Salvatrion Army have been telling him. Goff told a story about his father-in-law  Goff took Key down McGehan Close - where the girl Key took to Waitangi came from, and has now left for Australia.

That whole stunt has turned into a dead-end for Key.

But the real dead end for both parties appears to be their coalition allies.

As they say, you can choose your enemies, but you can't choose your coalition allies.

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

04 Dec 2011 07:08p.m.

dova wrote:

congrats the media got its one party state i mean dunn and ultra conservative john banks its just one big national party realy .stunning nat landslide well done mainstream media .

27 Nov 2011 09:42a.m.

bOb wrote:

lol @ Alan 'Patrick Gower' has been accused of being very pro National in the past as well. It seems you can't call a party out for its misdeeds with out being instantly labeled as being in the other 'enemy' camp. Its good to see 'Patrick Gower' picking on both partys these days, playing favorites and ignoring their misdeeds doesn't do this country any good, god knows we have way too many of these types of people in this country as it is.

25 Nov 2011 10:06p.m.

Jake wrote:

The whole thing is maddness, The more votes for Winnie the better, I hope he gets in and keeps them all to their word, both Labour and National have held NZ for too long in their grip and we have to endure the end results with never an apology for the major mistakes crickey theirs only 4 million odd people in NZ surely thats not hard to hold together and give its citizens a decent living standard,wage and health and education benefits, especially when the population is broken down to percentages of who requires what etc as in education, medical care, social services, JOBS.We are going to need our assets as the rest of the world falls apart finacially surely where America stands right now should be a insight into spreading to thin and the poverty line in England is reflected in their education crime and housing estates and unemployment with high immigrant problems, we must be able to do better with our 2 islands and 4 major cities !

23 Nov 2011 04:14p.m.

hayden wrote:

The worm must be a member of the Labour Party

23 Nov 2011 03:02p.m.

Doug wrote:

Reading some of these comments. Spelling and grammar could do with more money spent on them. The worm was interesting, but not always visible on screen. So what was happening to it when it wasn't showing? Nice to know what people are thinking but wont change my vote. Why did the food banks not get a mention? John Key appears to be a pragmatist which is great when everything is going okay. But where does he stand on "starving" in this country?

23 Nov 2011 02:03p.m.

pete wrote:

someone still hasnt told me how when you still hold 51% ,how then can that company be sold and lost forever as labor put it?????and it seems goff doesnt now know and is asking key for which assets are for sale.thought you told us goff you knew

23 Nov 2011 10:30a.m.

Neil wrote:

Amazing how so many right wingers see Patrick Gower as a Labour supporter - if anything he's just toneed down his pro-John Key stance/ love affair from all his past utterings. Just shows he's doing well at appearing un-biased now.

22 Nov 2011 11:42p.m.

ar. wrote:

Where did they find such a one eyed reporter.tv3 really hates the nats.

22 Nov 2011 09:43p.m.

Marta wrote:

The viewers deserves an apology from tv 3 for puting Paul Henry on the panel.He don't have the quality or skills and done nothing to deserve this privilege.

22 Nov 2011 06:28p.m.

Jack wrote:

Seriously. Hell the hell do you get twp raging tories on the panel? 3 if you include campbell when he has his moments. What a joke. Henry looked like his typical wanting to suck John Key's penis self. Ive voted National in the last election but defiantly will not be doing so this one. Key looked like a spoiled little smirking brat who wasn't getting his way. sounded way too desperate to. TWO TICKS LABOUR!