Coleman changes line on asylum seekers

Print

Tue, 12 Jul 2011 6:02p.m.

Asylum seekers from Sri Lanka display banners on a ship in Bintan island, Riau province (Reuters)

Asylum seekers from Sri Lanka display banners on a ship in Bintan island, Riau province (Reuters)

By Patrick Gower

A row has broken out over the shipload of Sri Lankan asylum seekers caught off Indonesia with pleas to come to New Zealand.

Prime Minister John Key says it is possible they are on their way, but others like Amnesty International disagree.

On board the ships was a New Zealand flag and signs calling New Zealand "The Godfather".

But despite the prayers of the 85 Sri Lankan asylum seekers there is no sympathy, certainly not for the smugglers in charge.

“We don't want a bar of what these people are doing, they are criminals,” says Mr Key.

“These are people that are trying to jump the queue.”

Mr Key has raised fears they were destined for New Zealand shores - a warning he has been making for some time.

“The intelligence we’ve had is it’s a possibility they were coming to New Zealand.”

But not everyone agrees including – surprisingly – Mr Key's own Immigration Minister Jonathan Coleman.

He says there were no maps or charts on board showing the way to New Zealand, and the signs were likely just attempts to pressure our government to take their case.

“It’s probably pretty unlikely that New Zealand was their truly intended destination,” says Mr Coleman.

The Sri Lankan civil war ended more than two years ago and it has been reported that at least some of the Tamils on board had been living in Malaysia since.

That is close to where they were detained in Indonesia and they still had 7000km to get to New Zealand.

Amnesty International says that is way too far and Mr Key is scare-mongering.

“[He is] deliberately raising the temperature because he feels public opinion would be behind him and some votes in this,” says Patrick Holmes of Amnesty International.

Of the six known previous attempts by refugee boats to reach New Zealand, one is thought to have sunk, one was intercepted, and none got very far.

Mr Key says its "inevitable" one will make it one day and explained later that he knows more about this current ship than Mr Coleman.

“He hasn't had an intelligence briefing,” says Mr Key.

And Mr Coleman dutifully changed his lines.

“[Do you think they were coming here?] I don't know, I’ve only got the evidence we have before us but you can't rule it out,” he says.

A Tamil community spokesperson says New Zealand has the opportunity to save the lives of the 85 Sri Lankan refugees.

New Zealand Tamil Studies and Humanitarian Trust founder, Armurajan Thevarajan, wants Mr Key to change his mind:

“Please allow these people who are in need of a place to save their lives, give them at least temporary permit to see that they are not punished. You are only promoting the very genocide the government of Sri Lanka is doing,” he says.  

Mr Thevarajan believes the group should be at least given temporary residence by authorities.

3 News / RadioLIVE

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

13 Jul 2011 10:02p.m.

Pat wrote:

Mr Coleman if are reading this in your daily media briefing please dont change your stance.

13 Jul 2011 03:33p.m.

davey wrote:

Te Rina,I agree what you have written.But why in hell should the tax payers of NZ have too pay $24 million dollars to Tonga as we have already more than 85 Tongan over stayers here and Key has had no balls to deport them.This is another election bribe too those Tongans who have citizen ship here.National should come clean,and not bribe their way through winning another term.

13 Jul 2011 01:33p.m.

Jim wrote:

Amnesty International, the greens and Goff to name afew say we should accept theses refugee's. But at what cost, The genuine Refuge who waits in line, the poor over burdened tax payer who bares the cost. And as soon as they gain residency then all the relations are on their way as well. The elderly to go on the pension and the rest who cant find employment onto some benefit, too which they have not contributed. If The Greens Goff and amnesty International are so concerned why don't they put there money where there collective mouths are and fund the refugee's. It is great to see that at least John Key has a back bone.

13 Jul 2011 08:43a.m.

Rachelle wrote:

We have no idea about the circumstances these people have been forced to leave their countries under. Yes they are Tamils but they may not have been a part of the fighting. There is no point jumping to conclusions before we know the facts.

12 Jul 2011 11:53p.m.

Te Rina wrote:

Some of them had a home in Malaysia so why did they leave it? The UN has a process for dealing with genuine refugees and if they try and que jump they should be sent straight back home, the taxpayer in this country cannot afford to look after our own people so why should we take some dishonest que jumpers??

12 Jul 2011 07:05p.m.

carolyn denton wrote:

Refugees that are waiting in camps will have to be put to the back of the queue because of the refugees that have "paid passage on a ship". Is this fair ? I think not. What are we saying to our children, that jumping the queue is ok if you have the money.

12 Jul 2011 06:36p.m.

Chris wrote:

A PM with guts. Goff says we should be more 'accepting' and says Keys language is 'too strong' - will he pay for their upkeep it they come here ? As for Keith Locke well we all know he wants all refuges to come here at tax payers expense. Yes we should take some refuges but people smugglers are a disgrace and que jumping is unfair on those who use the correct process.

12 Jul 2011 06:35p.m.

kane wrote:

Lets hope a big storm wash them away... God some of these people could be guilty of war crimes during their civil war... And considering the records kept on sri laken citizens isnt the best who knows what these people have done...