Community Max labelled a lemon by opposition

Print

Wed, 16 Feb 2011 11:36a.m.

A scheme to round up wild horses did not follow through

A scheme to round up wild horses did not follow through

By Liz Puranam

A 3 News investigation into how the Ministry of Social Development is spending millions of tax payer dollars has seen the opposition label the scheme a lemon.

On Monday night our investigation revealed that a taxpayer-funded community garden could only provide evidence of just one pumpkin being grown.

Yesterday, we revealed further oddities in the Community Max scheme, including one which involved breaking and taming wild horses.

The scheme was run by Richard Tu Marae, who received $170,343 in wage subsidies for young people to work here.

“Its about teaching those young people with some sort of work experience - ethics ethos,” he told 3 News last night.

“We wanted to identify who the owners were and look at the possibility of breaking some of them in and on selling them to an interested party that approached us.”

That interested party was Tame Iti, but the deal fell over when Tu Marae would not accept Iti's offer.

When we put this to the ministry of social development, they tried to stop the interview.

But at Parliament today all the talk was about the one pumpkin that was found as part of a $317,000 dollar tax-payer funded job project in Northland.

“Why has she spent more than $300,000 on a garden that has left participants unemployed and produced, just one pumpkin,” asked Labour MP Jacinda Ardern

The government is standing by the programme.

“We would hope that eventually, some of those people who haven't got jobs have still got something useful on their CV, apart from playing on the playstation,” said Bill English.

The Northland community garden is just one example from the $57 million Community Max scheme.

“We thought community max was a bit of a lemon - but it turned out to be a pumpkin,” said Labour leader Phil Goff.

Green Party co-leader Metiria Turei said the scheme was superficial.

“It’s a papering over the cracks scheme. They are not investing long-term in these people, they are not investing in proper skills that will help them get work.”

It took 3 News seven months to obtain the details of nineteen projects.

The Ministry of Social Development is still refusing to hand over paperwork for about 300 more.

The Government has now ordered an internal investigation into the projects.

3 News

 

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

03 Mar 2011 02:12p.m.

missy wrote:

what i find amazing is that a reporter doing an incompetent job such as going to a job site 8 months later (garden) after it has been harvested and expecting to see vege produce manages to get a major part of society to undermine these young people who provided vegetables to their community and they are then publicly underminded and ridiculed by a nation. Rebecca Wright shouldgive her wage for the garden story to those young people, who did do their garden 8 months ago.

22 Feb 2011 11:25a.m.

Danielle wrote:

For the opposition this is all about points scoring. Good on the national government for believing in the scheme and assisting those who have found it difficult to get work to get a hand up. The only lemon in this picture is the opposition party!

16 Feb 2011 05:05p.m.

Clarke wrote:

Paula Bennett is what National would consider White Trailer Trash.... with an incy wincy tiny bit of Maori thrown in there... making her the perfect token gesture.

And thats what Community Max was... a token gesture... it was Paula Bennett paying young kids to do a bit of sewing or gardening so that she could claim she was doing something about youth unemployment.

But in all seriousness she didnt care... she just wanted to rearrange her figures on paper a little.

Community projects that have an expiry date arent a long term solution to unemployment.

They are merely a token Gesture like Paula Bennett herself.

Laura

16 Feb 2011 01:09p.m.

Dave wrote:

The only lemon is the person who made the comment. If the scheme is run properly like the one in Upper Hutt - it is totally worth the money invested.

16 Feb 2011 12:34p.m.

Gosh wrote:

A lemon? Nice way of putting it. I would have said it is a disgusting, despicable waste of money and that heads should roll. But I guess that’s just me..