Concerns over relaxed pork import laws

Print

Mon, 18 Jul 2011 7:00p.m.

PRRS causes severe immune deficiencies - similar to HIV - leaving animals exposed to other diseases

PRRS causes severe immune deficiencies - similar to HIV - leaving animals exposed to other diseases

By Lachlan Forsyth

James Freeth runs a large free range pig farm in the shadows of the Southern Alps.

His pigs are happy pigs. They have plenty of shelter, lots of food, and of course all that mud to wallow in.

But the downside of all that lovely open air is they are also incredibly vulnerable to airborne diseases.

“We can't really put a little dust mask on the front of each pig. There's nothing we can do, just got to cross out fingers and hope, once it's in the country. The best bet is to stop diseases coming into the country, rather than trying to deal with the mess afterwards,” Mr Freeth said.

The worst of those diseases is Porcine Reproductive Respiratory Syndrome.

“[It] is a viral disease that affects pigs, it is recognised as the most damaging and severe pig disease in the world, and it is the one we are most concerned about in New Zealand. We don't have it presently in NZ, and we'd like to keep it that way,” said Bruce Welch, a pig vet.

PRRS causes severe immune deficiencies - similar to HIV - leaving animals exposed to other diseases.

It also causes significant deaths to both live and unborn piglets, so the thought of it becoming established in New Zealand is a huge worry.

“Our concerns are one the one hand requiring us to have the highest animal welfare standards in the world - and fair enough - on the other hand relaxing controls that will allow this disease to enter and the animal welfare issues that go with it,” says Mr Welch.

Processed pork imports are already allowed into New Zealand - as well as raw pork from PRRS-free countries.

But now MAF wants to relax import standards from countries known to have PRRS - such as the US and Canada.

John Hartnell of Federated Farmers says he was told it was to do with free trade.

“I don't believe that's the case when it risks and industry, which is what we're looking at here. It's not a risk that we want. It almost makes a mockery of the new biosecurity systems they're trying to put in under the govt industry agreements,” he said.

Mr Freeth has already dealt with PRRS once before in the UK, where it's known as blue ear disease.

“Back then we were quite young, we had nothing behind us and the pigs were all we had, it was everything to us, so we were devastated by it,” he said.

“Back then it was quite a mild strain, but now the strains in America and Canada are a lot more virulent and a lot more devastating on the farm.”

Even that mild strain was enough to put him out of business. Now he is facing it all over again.

He and his fellow farmers are wondering why?

“I think it's bewilderment really, nobody can understand why. Why would we want to relax standards and potentially let a devastating disease in?” He said.

MAF says the risk of PRRS becoming established here is negligible - a one in 1227 year chance.

But a study by Massey University in 2007 found that once established in an initial herd, PRRS would spread rapidly and widely throughout New Zealand.

Using a mean of 4.3 infected premises each year, and a 36 percent probability of it spreading - far from a one in 1200 year risk, the study estimated a 95 percent likelihood of a multi-herd outbreak within three years.

So opponents say whatever the odds are, they are too high, and once it arrives, farmers fear there will be no stopping it

“There's 130 commercial farms but there's 10,000 people with pigs in their backyard who feed them on scraps. It just takes one piece of uncooked meat fed to them and the game's up,” Mr Freeth said.

The Greens’ Kevin Hague agrees.

“There seems no advantage to NZ consumers or the NZ pig industry to take that risk. It seems only a government hell-bent on free trade and facilitating free trade that is driving this decision,” he said.

When the Greens and Federated Farmers are singing the same tune, you know it's serious.

“It's a small industry. It doesn't take much before they could be wiped out and it would be a hard road to recover for those industries,” said Mr Hartnell.

“I cannot see how a rational analysis of evidence by MAF could possibly conclude that this is the right decision to make,” said Mr Hague.

If MAF gets its way, Mr Freeth says free range farms like his will disappear. There's simply no way he will put his animals at risk.

“The last thing we want to see is an animal suffering. It's devastating to farmers as well as pigs. Because a lot of illnesses you can treat, but this one there's nothing. You just sit back and wait.”

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

20 Jul 2011 03:30p.m.

MCT wrote:

Someone in MAF has been pushing for imports of raw pig meat from countries affected by PPRS for years. Jim Anderson as a minister in the last Labour government push this issue back to MAF for further investigation. I think either the Audit Office or Police should investigate MAF employees for possible corruption. BIOSECURITY AUSTRALIA are watching this issue play out in New Zealand, because they also do not have PPRS and will not let unprocessed imports of pig meat into Australia. Australia is concerned that New Zealand could become the weak link in the chain and are concerned that MAF in New Zealand does not appear to have the intellectual depth to investigate PPRS objectively.

19 Jul 2011 10:14p.m.

Niqi Biqi wrote:

We should all become Vegans... Problem solved.

19 Jul 2011 12:06p.m.

Mandy wrote:

Get a grip! We don't ever need to import pork. I agree with all above comments. Let's concentrate on feeding ourselves properly and exporting excellent food that is excess to our requirements rather than bringing in an inferior product for the sake of a trade deal. My priority is to have high-quality, local, seasonal food at a reasonable price accessible to Kiwis for the whole of life. End of story. We have the land, the water and the climate needed to easily achieve this. And a population of only 4m. We could be the best-fed country in the world. Just do it!

19 Jul 2011 09:51a.m.

Sonia wrote:

When will we learn that prevention is better than a cure. We are geographically isolated from our markets which is a disadvantage but we are disease free which is a huge advantage, why loose the one benefit we have...........stop being so short sighted and think of the next generation who will have to deal with the disease

19 Jul 2011 07:57a.m.

Jane wrote:

I'm not reassured by MAF's predictions that this disease won't affect us. They've done an appalling job in many areas, albeit with few resources. Can we get a MAF person (or even better, the Minister) in to discuss the subject?

18 Jul 2011 09:44p.m.

TWE wrote:

The Americans' price for having a free trade agreement? (As well as many other conditions I'm sure) Seems a pretty stupid idea.

18 Jul 2011 08:43p.m.

Russell wrote:

I dont know why we need to import pork into New Zealand, if the country was run properly the need to import meat or vegetables wouldnt exist the money would be made in exporting products then prices in New Zealand wouldnt need to be as high as they are, we pay just as much sometimes more than what other countries pay for products we produce, NZ lamb in the UK can often be in the same price range as what we pay in our supermarkets here, ridiculous indeed so we import other countries products and any diseases or bugs they may have and jeopardize what we produce here all for a few quick dollars, go back to the good old days where New Zealand worked for New Zealand and didnt rip off ourselves.

18 Jul 2011 08:33p.m.

hlovingCom wrote:

We need to improve the diseases prevention.Or the happy pigs will become angry pigs.lol