• Full Story

Crafar farms not a vital NZ asset - Natural Dairy

Print

Wed, 11 Aug 2010 4:30a.m.

By Deanna Harris

Natural Dairy NZ Holdings is disappointed by the country’s widespread opposition to land sales and foreign investment in New Zealand and say the Crafar farms are not a vital New Zealand asset.

In the latest 3 News Reid Research poll 1,000 voters were asked, ‘should the Government change the rules around selling land – like farms to foreigners?’

An overwhelming 75.5 percent said, ‘yes, tighten the rules’, 14 percent said leave it as it is and just 8 percent said relax the rules and let overseas interests buy our land.

The results came after Natural Dairy NZ’s bid for the 16 Crafar farms.

Natural Dairy said in a statement to 3 News:

“The farms are not, in any sense, vital strategic assets and the New Zealand economy can only benefit from our purchase of the farms.

“This is not a wholesale sell off of large tracts of land that would see New Zealanders become ‘tenants in their own land’. 

It involves just 0.5% of the country’s dairy farmland.”

Natural Dairy is a Chinese company which changed its name from China Jin Hui Mining and is registered in the Cayman Islands.

The Green Party disagree and are pleased with the poll results.

“New Zealanders recognise the importance land is to the economy and they want that protected and one of the ways to do that is to keep it in New Zealand hands,” said Green Party co-leader Metiria Turei.

But Natural Dairy NZ say they will considerably boost New Zealand’s export earnings.

“Rather than simply shipping lower valued milk powder overseas, used for ingredients by other countries manufacturers, we want to manufacture and export ‘added value’ milk products such as UHT long life milk, speciality dairy products and infant formula to an insatiable market in China,” said Natural Dairy.

Their first step towards this investment has been applying to the Overseas Investment Office to acquire the 16 Crafar farms.

“Yes, a portion of the profits from the venture will be returned to investors living abroad (no different from the current interest paid by farmers to our offshore banks) but, in return, every year the New Zealand economy will gain hundreds of millions of dollars in increased export earnings, taxes and jobs.

“This investment could go to Australia or South America where we know it will be eagerly accepted but we believe in New Zealand and its world-class dairy industry.”

RadioLIVE business editor Andrew Patterson says he also understands the concerns of New Zealanders.

He says the government should look at possible 50:50 joint ventures or alternatively, leasing the land to overseas investors rather than selling.

“If New Zealanders want to invest in China they have to do it on a joint venture basis. I think it should be a level playing field.

“That, I think will be more satisfactory to New Zealanders then land sold out right.”

Last month John Key stated his concerns by saying: “If we ended up as tenants in our own country, then I can't see how that would be in our best interests.”

Natural Dairy agrees with Mr Keys concerns.

“Your Prime Minister is right to worry about large amounts of farmland being sold to non-New Zealanders and there may be a day when you decide New Zealand has to restrict the amount of land sold to overseas interests but that day may still be far off. The vast bulk of New Zealand farmland remains in New Zealand ownership and our limited acquisition will not threaten that fact,” it said.

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

12 Aug 2010 05:43p.m.

Cathy wrote:

What a bunch of shallow thinkers. I agree companies can be moved off shore and lost to NZ if sold to overseas organisations but land can never be moved. I agree with Paora that land sales are not the emotional problem some people like to imagine. As Paora says, it would be so easy to lease the land if we wanted to, if only to be able to say the land had not been sold to overseas interests. Not that it would make any difference in any operational way, but it might hopefully stop the blind bleating by the anti sale of anything mob and the unnecessary hysteria they try to spread to stop progressing our country.

12 Aug 2010 10:16a.m.

margaret wrote:

Once somebody has the foot in the door, it is easier for them to take over the house. Keep NZ Dairy industry in NZ hands.

12 Aug 2010 03:16a.m.

Chargone wrote:

Consider: how did the British colonize most of NZ? where did the Major Problems come from? that's right, land sales. backed up by the fact that the British empire was much more capable of enforcing it's will by way of simply being massively bigger. the comparisons are kinda scary if you think about it. do we really want to be going down that path again?

11 Aug 2010 07:44p.m.

johnmillan wrote:

Keep it in NZ ownership?Key do a deal with the Maori party,so they can be up your back side for next years elections.

11 Aug 2010 02:20p.m.

Paora wrote:

Whats the problem? Land can never be moved anywhere else. The Crafar farms in particular are not even all in one block, but actually located all over the place and would be better described as many different farms in different areas. If there is a continuing hang-up on overseas ownership for whatever strange reason the anti seller group can come up with, they can't do anything about the already huge amount of NZ land already sold to overseas individual owners or organisations. Simply put, why worry about ownership when it is simply resolved by allowing future sales to be a 100yr lease. Even if this would not change the use of the land 'not a jot', it may sound better to the bigots.

11 Aug 2010 12:58p.m.

ridley wrote:

These people say its not a vital NZ asset.Well at this time its not.However its a start a foot in the door as it were.Soon this small trickle would lead to a flood of NZ land being sold off in overwhelming proportions.

11 Aug 2010 09:09a.m.

Lightseed wrote:

of course they are not a strategic assets. Neither are the farms sold to Russian and Chinese companies in the south island during labours term, or the milk powder factory built by the Russian company that only exports milk powder and only to Russia, or the Chinese factory in the making. Neither are the hundreds of farms owned internationally by fontera, the apple board and the kiwi fruit growers.

11 Aug 2010 07:54a.m.

V wrote:

John Keys election breaker?.

11 Aug 2010 05:01a.m.

asean wrote:

Oh my that name change is so subtle. They even added an NZ to make it kosher. And the polled 8% who said "relax"? Probably Han. Good time for China to learn about give and take, as the South China sea matter clearly shows they are headlong into pigheadedness.