3News » Home

Full Story

Crafar farms sale comes with conditions

15 comments | Post Comment email Email printer friendly Print    Text Size:
aA
aA
aA
One of the Crafar farms

One of the Crafar farms

video
Fri, 27 Jan 2012 6:45p.m.

By Patrick Gower

The Crafar farms are now the Chinese farms.

Government ministers have approved a recommendation from the Overseas Investment Office that the 16 farms be sold to the Shanghai Pengxin group.

It's a $200 million deal which comes with strings attached for the Chinese.

The Crafar farms make up 7900 hectares of prime New Zealand farmland, and the Government has decided they can be sold off to a Chinese company.

Prime Minister John Key says under the law, his ministers had no choice.

"They can't just say no," says Mr Key. "They would have to say no, and here is the reason why - and one of those reasons can't be, 'Because you are Chinese.'"

Pengxin has interests in property, mining, and now, farming - although some of it looks a bit different to the traditional New Zealand way.

"I think this is a positive for those particular farms," says Mr Key.

The OIO added these conditions:

Pengxin is barred from owning New Zealand milk processing plants;
It must invest $14 million in economic/environmental sustainability;
Set up dairy farming training school;
Guarantee public walking access to some areas.

The state-owned enterprise Landcorp will manage the farms on behalf of Penxing.

"What we want to do here is make sure New Zealanders have the first right to try and buy our own land back, otherwise we'll end up being tenants in our own land," says Labour leader David Shearer.

The losers are a lower Kiwi-owned group headed by Sir Michael Fay. Its only chance now is a last ditch court challenge.  

The Penxing bid is all part of a rush by China to get food security for its massive population and a desire for what's called 'vertical integration' - owning the supply chain from start to finish.

Mr Key is not worried - yet.

"If we see a run on New Zealand farms, or what I perceive to be a run on New Zealand farms, or what I see to be an unacceptable level of sales to foreigners, then the Government reserves the right to change the law."

This is really a small skirmish in a global battle about China's influence and needs. Kiwis will have to get used to demands for our farmland from foreign buyers and the politics around it.

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Comments [15]

Chris
29 Jan 2012 6:39p.m.

What a joke under Labour 10x times more land was sold to 'foreigners' then ever under National. [650.000 ha vs. 39,000 a.] Labour signed the the free trade agreement with China when Peter's was foreign minister. No one complained when the USA / UK / the Swiss brought up far more land under Labour. What hypocrites Labour and you mononic supporter's are. Not yo mention rednecks with you anti Chinese attitude - you all make me sick.

Ruz
28 Jan 2012 9:08a.m.

John Key owns property overseas (Hawaii) so he is unlikely to see the selling off of NZ land to foreign buyers as "no go". China has the ability to buy virtually all of our farms and it will be interesting to see if they seek to widen ownership with more purchases. Right now there does not seem to be anything to stop them and clearly the current Government sees no problem with that.

Terence
28 Jan 2012 8:50a.m.

@ George 1. Why did the bank lend Crafar so much? simple greed, just as in the sub-prime market in the US, so the bank must take some of the blame. 2. We are not allowed to by land in China so why should we let China buy land here, they should lease it like we do there. 3. The government is not bound to follow this recommendation, it is a ministerial decision. 4.The investment required is so high because the farms are being sold as one lot. If they were sold individually, local farmers could buy them, or local Iwi who have large amounts of settlement money would be very interested and could go it alone or form partnerships.

Bob
28 Jan 2012 8:49a.m.

Give me leadership i at least will listen to the people. Got to be better than this plonker.

Fellowes
28 Jan 2012 8:17a.m.

Not one more acre should be sold into foreign ownership. And no asset sales. I hope all you people who voted for National are hanging your heads in shame now when you see the mess you have got the country in by having National in power.

Grover
28 Jan 2012 2:07a.m.

Why sell the entire supply chain? I always thought the trick was to add value to the products we sell i.e. make ice cream from milk etc. Future food shortages will be epidemic in a matter of years and we won't be able to capitalize on it. Well done the NZ Government. I always knew the gene pool was too small for decent leadership.

abo
27 Jan 2012 11:14p.m.

NATIONAL is ALL about PROFIT - NOTHING else matters - selling NZ - who cares as long as the top 10% make a profit - the rest of us - you can GUARANTEE they care not a jot about us!!!!

Chris
27 Jan 2012 10:50p.m.

@George: "The receivers are appointed by the secured creditor (the bank)."

Would this be the same bank that allowed that Crafar idiot to rack up more debt than a small African nation? Maybe if they hadn't been so wreckless in their quest for profit, then they wouldn't now be forced to sell of large chunks of our country.


"The OIC has rules to follow about an overseas investor buying NZ land. These have been set by successive governments over a number of years. If they pass the test then they can recommend the sale go through. They cannot just refuse to accept just because they are overseas purchasers, Chinese or any other nationality."

Like many other rules and laws in this country, they are hopelessly out of date, and far too often we are forced to wring our hands and ask why we didn't have better forsight. Its disgusting that John Key can ram through a retrospective law change that allows the police to spy on NZ citizens, yet he won't lift a finger to keep a strategic asset in NZ hands.

"The government is bound to follow this recommendation. If they refused then this would be subject to court proceedings and NZ's reputation as a place to do business would be severly compromised. Effectively we would be relegated to a banana republic."

Please tell me which other 1st world countries have laws that allow foreign buyers come in and buy up large tracts of land (commercially lucrative or otherwise). I suspect we are already regarded as a Banana republic, and based on this latest act of treachery it is a reputation well deserved.

Clarke
27 Jan 2012 10:07p.m.

I'm afraid your arguement about court action is baseless George... there was a perfect non contestable reason that the government could use without being sued... which was that they were protecting the integrity of our countries own food supply.... the very same reason that the chinese used to aquire the farms in the first place. Selling our dairy farms to foreign companies means we lose part of our own supply which will likely raise the price of wholesale milk products for us in the long term. The chinese investors arent using what is created on New Zealand land for sale in the New Zealand market.. all of their product is intended for the chinese market alone. As are the generated profits. from those farms... so how do Kiwis win from this at all? they dont.

Mugy7
27 Jan 2012 10:05p.m.

Made of racism I'm assuming?

Post a comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide here
Name:
Email: (Won't be published)
Comment:



3News Video 3News Audio