Dairy changes not a 'backward step' - John Key

Print

Wed, 25 Jan 2012 8:10a.m.

Under the Dairy Industry Restructuring Act, the dairy co-operative is currently required to provide 3 percent of its raw milk to rival companies (AAP)

Under the Dairy Industry Restructuring Act, the dairy co-operative is currently required to provide 3 percent of its raw milk to rival companies (AAP)

By Dylan Moran

Prime Minister John Key is refuting Fonterra's claims proposed changes to the dairy industry by the Government are a "backward step".

A Ministry of Agriculture review into the price of milk yesterday recommended an increase in the volume of milk Fonterra has to make available to competitors and more transparency when it comes to price setting. But the dairy giant is unhappy about giving away more of its product, arguing the proceeds will go directly offshore.

"The Government's move to require more raw milk to be handed over to increasingly foreign-owned dairy companies operating in New Zealand will impose nearly $200 million of additional costs over the next three years alone and work against our efforts to reduce the price of milk in New Zealand," Fonterra chairman Sir Henry van der Heyden said in a statement yesterday.

Speaking on Firstline this morning Prime Minister John Key took steps to assure the company and its shareholders the moves are beneficial to all involved.

“It’s very important that we have transparency, because Fonterra find themselves primarily in the monopoly position, they control about 95 percent of all milk production in New Zealand, it’s actually in Fonterra’s interests that there is competition in that marketplace,” he says.

Under the Dairy Industry Restructuring Act, the dairy co-operative is currently required to provide 3 percent of its raw milk to rival companies like Synlait and Tatua – around 600 million litres per annum. This will be raised to 5 percent if the changes are brought in, but phased out for Fonterra’s biggest competitors.

A paid margin of 10 cents per kilo supplied by Fonterra would also cease.

The DIRA was originally put forward to encourage competition, and the Government says the mooted changes will lead to more transparency around milk pricing, a positive for New Zealand consumers.

“Although Fonterra's approach is consistent with that expected in a competitive market, lack of transparency remains an issue," said Primary Industries Minister David Carter on Tuesday.

“We’ve actually been overall confident that Fonterra have been doing the right thing, they’ve been working hard to reduce milk prices where they can, they voluntarily had a freeze on domestic milk prices,” he says, adding the international price of milk is reflected in NZ milk prices and the company is not gouging consumers.

The changes will continue to be debated, says Mr Key.

“This is a discussion document, there’s a lot of work to go from here."

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

26 Jan 2012 09:22p.m.

Chris wrote:

I don't have a problem with the Govt reigning in the Fonterra juggernaught, but I don't understand why they are leaving the supermarkets free to continue their price gouging. I'm guessing its to avoid upsetting current/potential overseas investors.

25 Jan 2012 01:07p.m.

Mike wrote:

So if a private company needs to disclose publicly its costings then we needs for all the SOE's to do the same.

Including our power companies, our transport like Auckland Airport. Could even do with transparency from our Government spending. Local and Central! Plus show foreign contributions to our political parties as some of them are very sizable! Eg the Pro-EU/anti-NZ stance of one significant party in Parliment has been bought/paid by foreign contributions.

Why should Fonterra be held to a level of transparency above everyone else?

Fonterra currently has a 10 cents margin/kg, so now they are expected to supply even cheaper and more milk to the foreign owned competitors?

If Fonterra is required to have this transparency then those companies that buy from or are supplied from Fonterra need to have similar transparency.

Currently milk prices are up, but we also have a world recession due to the EU fumbling, so if we kick our producers till they are down it will kill our recovery. Many of NZ's producers are still not being taxed heavily from losses brought forward from the last downturn!

Luckily we didn't have the idiots who consider turnover as profit win the election, but its still not a good thing.

25 Jan 2012 11:56a.m.

Bruce wrote:

Of cause Fonterra will claim its a step backward. They want to protect their empire. A friend of mine who is an ex employee of Fonterra told me a few months ago that it costs Fonterra 25cents to produce a 2 litre bottle of milk. Why are we paying upwards of $5 for that 2 litre bottle of milk?

25 Jan 2012 10:41a.m.

Barney wrote:

Government meddling always has a bad outcome. When will they ever learn look at the mess they have made of the electicity industry. Is the price of milk really the most important issue facing us?

25 Jan 2012 09:14a.m.

Dave wrote:

Pleased the Govt is stepping in, a bit of competition never hurt anyone