Digital music quality not good enough - Neil Young

Print

Sat, 04 Feb 2012 6:22p.m.

Neil Young

Neil Young

By Tony Field

Neil Young has a problem with modern music.

It is not the quality of the songs, nor the performers that bugs him though, it is the sound quality of digital music.

“We live in the digital age and unfortunately we only have five percent of the content in the music we used to have in the mainstream,” says Mr Young.

And Neil Young says his concern was shared by the man who brought the world the ipod: Apple founder Steve Jobs.

“Steve Jobs was a pioneer of digital music, and his legacy is tremendous, [but] when he went home he listened to vinyl,” says Mr Young.

And the better quality of vinyl is one reason why the format is making a small, but noticeable comeback.

“The better your stereo system the better your vinyl will sound. But as a general rule vinyl always sounds much warmer and more immediate than CDs or mp3s,” says Dorlay Bray, of Southbound Records.

Neil Young maintains he is not anti digital, but at the moment it simply is not living up to its potential.

“It’s not that digital is bad or inferior, it’s just the way it’s being used is not sufficient to transfer the depth of the art,” says Mr Young, who says people should have the choice to download low resolution or high resolution music files.

The downside to this, however, would be that high quality files would be huge – requiring half an hour to download one song using high-speed broadband. They would also cost a lot more.

“People should not associate high quality with inconvenience. That’s a myth,” says Mr Young. “We are living in the 21st century,all of these things are possible”.

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

07 Feb 2012 10:07a.m.

Brock Barr wrote:

I saw a clip where a bunch of musicians and audio engineers had a pick whether music that they had actually wrote and recorded was being played back to them on CD or Vinyl. They either got it wrong or couldn't tell. That was CD, which can be picked against low bit rate mp3 quite easily. I've an audio engineering diploma myself and I'm not convinced that Vinyl sounds any better, there is just less top end (hence warmth). Turn your treble knob down for the same effect. I think there's just a "romance" to the spinning black circle.

06 Feb 2012 08:56p.m.

Joe wrote:

Neil *YOUNG* yeah right.
Good god hes looking *OLD* lol

05 Feb 2012 06:14p.m.

Karl wrote:

Neil is totally wrong. Digital is NOT to blame, but the engineers who compress the dynamic range of the track. It's the dynamic range of the track that counts, NOT what medium it is on. See my post / rant here: http://www.gpforums.co.nz/thread/441018/1/ Those blaming it on digital know little of the science behind audio.

04 Feb 2012 08:53p.m.

Jack wrote:

Yes, I particularly like the crackle off even new vinyl, and the inconvenience of getting next to no music on a lump of easily damaged plastic which has to be stored carefully. (I do prefer my wax cylinders though). I also prefer my books to be typeset with blotchy ink from moveable type, and my television in low-res with 400 by 600 slightly smudgy pixels - especially black-and-white shows. Artists and producers have complete control over digital music. If they wanted it to feel "warmer", they could make it sound exactly like shoddy old vinyl.

04 Feb 2012 08:35p.m.

Warren wrote:

I would much rather listen to vinyl any day. If you have never heard a song from vinyl compare it to a digital version and you will realise how much quality you lose in digital format.

04 Feb 2012 08:30p.m.

cyril wrote:

Dead right Neil not only does it make music crap I have a hard time hearing/understanding speech on digital devices