Discharge hearing over Tui river

Print

Discharge hearing over Tui river

3News NZ

The river the Tui girls bathe in - which is much dirtier than seen here - coul have Fonterra's milk by-product pumped into it

The river the Tui girls bathe in - which is much dirtier than seen here - coul have Fonterra's milk by-product pumped into it

By Adam Ray

Dairy giant Fonterra wants to flush milk by-product straight into a river famous for its link to the Tui Brewery at Mangatainoka.

It has been arguing its case at a resource consent hearing.

It wants to discharge factory waste upstream from the brewery and its director of operations, Brent Taylor, says it won’t pollute the Mangatainoka River. 

“I think [the Tui girls] have been swimming in the past and they can swim in the future,” he says.

Fonterra wants to discharge a product called condensate - water with remnants of milk resulting from the production of milk powder. .

The dairy giant has been arguing its case at a resource consent hearing.

But Ross Gilliespie, whose family has lived near the river for fifty years, says it is already polluted enough.

“Is New Zealand the new India where cows are sacred and rivers are profane?,” he asks.

Fonterra has been putting condensate into a nearby stream feeding into the river. It’s now full of algae and Mr Gilliespie says it looks like the “upchuck of a dog’s breakfast”.

Fonterra says the algae problem should be solved when it is more diluted with the main river.

“Because it’s like water, we’re looking to improve the mixing so we’re putting it into a larger body of water,” says Mr Taylor.  

The Department of Conservation and Fish and Game have withdrawn their opposition after Fonterra promised to lower the discharge temperature, and put it onto paddocks instead of into the river when it's low during summer.

Fish and Game’s Phil Teal says their initial concerns have been mitigated.

“During the summer low flow months we felt the condensate was going to cause problems for the trout population,” he says.

Mr Gillespie accepts Fonterra will get approval and he is worried it will lead to the factory being expanded.

Fonterra says there are no such expansion plans but wouldn’t rule it out.

“We have no current plans but if we were to expand in the North Island, and milk production in the North Island has been stable, it’s one of our options,” says Mr Taylor

A decision on Fonterra's application could be made within three weeks.

3 News

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

21/05/2012 3:12:54 p.m.

Allan M wrote:

Clean discharge. Clean green New Zealand. Yeah right.

Jim Seaview states that Fonterra should be ashamed.

It is in fact the New Zealand people who should be ashamed that have allowed themselves to be conned and have bought into this environmentally destructive 'pseudo free-market' which has been rigged so big money can do what it likes regardless of the mountains of evidence as to how environmetally irresponsible their drive for profit is.

And the dairy farmers should also be ashamed that they support such environmental destruction.

In the long run we will all be losers.

21/05/2012 11:43:07 a.m.

Richard wrote:

Just 'where' do thes people from Fonterra think their waste ends up? Right throughout the foodchain. Tui's should definitely put up a poster about this.

19/05/2012 2:10:21 p.m.

Jim Seaview wrote:

QUOTE: "Fonterra says the algae problem should be solved when it is more diluted with the main river.
“Because it’s like water, we’re looking to improve the mixing so we’re putting it into a larger body of water,” says Mr Taylor."

Fonterra has shown clearly that their Environmental policies (or what is left of them) are clearly back in the 50's era where "dilution is the solution" was the Industrial norm and that is why so many factories were set up by rivers.

Their overpaid Environmental managers have missed the mark completely when they argue their case at a resource consent hearing. Again their only policy seems to be "dumping is the cheapest option so lets do it".

Fonterra should be ashamed.



19/05/2012 1:09:48 a.m.

Makere wrote:

Im staggered. Where are the scientific reports? How can resource consent be obtained without expert witness? This is unbelievable.