3News » Home
Full Story

Do climate scandals discredit global warming case?

3 comments | Post Comment email Email printer friendly Print    Text Size:
aA
aA
aA
UN climate chief Yvo de Boer (Reuters)

UN climate chief Yvo de Boer (Reuters)

video
Fri, 05 Feb 2010 3:40p.m.

UN climate chief Yvo de Boer says that recent scandals over climate data had not discredited the scientific evidence that global warming existed and must be countered.

"What's happened, it's unfortunate, it's bad, it's wrong, but I don't think it has damaged the basic science," the head of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) told The Associated Press.

Global warming sceptics have expressed anger after a UN report warning that Himalayan glaciers could be gone by 2035 turned out to be off by hundreds of years because of a typo - the actual year was 2350 - and over stolen emails from the University of East Anglia's climate science unit.

But de Boer, speaking on the sidelines of the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, said that didn't change the fact that it was going to happen.

"Concluding that the Himalayan glaciers are going to disappear later is like being happy about the fact that the Titanic is sinking more slowly than we had originally feared, even though it's still going to sink," he said.

De Boer expressed confidence that the business leaders at Davos, who were starting to enjoy an economic recovery after a rough couple of years, would invest anew in renewable energy.

The UN Climate chief admitted he was "depressed" after the climate talks in Copenhagen failed to produce a binding accord and said there should be more meetings to get all countries on board for an accord before the next talks in Mexico.

But he also said he had the sense that people did not feel climate change was off the agenda and that energy sector investments that were put on hold because of the crisis were being made again.

On Sunday, the environment ministers from Brazil, South Africa, India and China met in the Indian capital New Delhi to discuss how they would fight global warming.

The four nations, which brokered a political accord with President Barack Obama at last month's climate summit in Copenhagen, will play a key role in shaping a legally binding climate deal that the UN hopes will be completed by the end of 2010 in Mexico.

APTN

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Comments [3]

V
05 Feb 2010 7:15p.m.

No they totally destroy the IPCC! a vehicle created by the UN to foster a new Fraud on humanity, Its sole mission to prove with scientific BS that MAN and MAN alone is responsible for weather calamities. The IPCC has systematically concocted a Global Warming as its sole mantra, When that didn't come to pass, Climate Change becomes the target, Now I see the Al Gore's and the head of the IPCC are promoting Peak Water as the new Bogey science!. The only thing they really want is total control of your life!. OR non-life if they see fit!.

Sceptic
05 Feb 2010 5:14p.m.

The science is still valid? How exactly... What happened to all the talk about 'peer reviewed science', where was the peer reviews of those so called 'reports' that were so wrong??? So far we have had vanishing glaciers that aren't... Melting polar ice caps that have had record snow falls... Amazon rainforest vanishing for lack of rainfall that isn't The warming weather stations in China that can't be found... The selective use of weather stations in the USA to justify warming... Global warming based on selective tree ring data... Emails suggesting that scientists have selectively excluded data that does not agree with global warming... Conflicts of interest with the head of the IPCC involved with companies that have won contracts based on his reports Increasing natural disasters attributed to climate change, except there not... Yes, nothing to be sceptical about. I can see how the science is conclusive.

cynical
05 Feb 2010 4:37p.m.

sure, global warming in New Zealand in the last 10 years has amounted to zero - well, zero point one of a degree, which cannot even be measured accurately, nor is it statistically reliable. Now, scientists say it is only in certain places....
But for man to think that its actions are responsible is rather doubtful, if not almost obscene and arrogant. All man wants to do is cash in, rather than evolve. What is new?
Is anyone against doing things better? I doubt it, so why the hype? One thing is for sure, the planet will correct itself - unless it is permanently out of the sun's orbit.

Post a comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide here
Name:
Email: (Won't be published)
Comment:



3News Video 3News Audio

Post your opinion