• Full Story

Documentary looks at the 'demon weed'

Print

Wed, 13 Jul 2011 12:44p.m.

European reserach shows alcohol and tobacco are more harmful than cannabis

European reserach shows alcohol and tobacco are more harmful than cannabis

By Emma Mackie

A TV3 documentary about a proposed law change that could go easy on cannabis users airs tonight, but documentary maker Savage says while cannabis is not the demon weed, it is still a problematic drug.

The former University of Auckland lecturer and filmmaker says he wanted the documentary (Inside NZ: High Times on at 8:30pm tonight) to give a balanced view of cannabis issues while highlighting that current laws are ineffective.

“The two things we wanted to do with the documentary is to say cannabis is not as bad as people often say, and on the other hand it’s actually worse than some people realise.

“In particular we wanted people to understand that you can get addicted to cannabis, you can crash your car when you’re stoned, and it is damaging for young people to smoke cannabis."

However, Savage believes cannabis law is an issue of balancing the rights of the individual against the rights of the community.

“The community wants to control drug use but there are some individuals that want to use drugs, so we have to find some sort of balance between the two.

“The cannabis laws don’t work, they don’t control the use of cannabis, they don’t stop young people using cannabis, and they don’t do anything to improve the health of cannabis users.”

The documentary also focuses on research showing alcohol and tobacco are more harmful than cannabis.

“Cannabis is not as bad as those drugs, so while there are problems associated with cannabis, they’re not as bad.

“That doesn’t make cannabis better, it just means it’s not as bad as those drugs.”

The two scientific studies from the Netherlands and UK ranked illicit drugs according to the harm they do to individual and society.

Both studies ranked cannabis less harmful than alcohol and tobacco.

Savage says the documentary combines his “bigger picture view” with the heavily pro-cannabis stance of Arik Reiss, whom he met at West Auckland cannabis club, The Daktory.

The club has been operating for two and a half years and Savage describes it as an “activist centre where you can go and use cannabis and be part of the cannabis movement”.

Up until the trial of Dakta Green the club was selling cannabis too, but that stopped after the club’s founder was sentenced to eight months jail on charges relating to possession, supply and sale of cannabis.

Despite being an advocate for the cannabis club model, the filmmaker says The Daktory does have problems.

“I think a lot of people at the club smoke a lot of cannabis and far too much cannabis, and there’s not enough emphasis at the club on moderation, on dealing with people’s addiction.”

“They make an effort to do it but I think they could have done a lot more in terms of addressing some of the excessive use issues that were there.”

He says he did not know people at the club well enough to know if any of them suffer cannabis-induced psychosis or long term problems associated with abuse.

“While cannabis is not the demon weed, it’s still a problematic drug.”

However cannabis movement advocates are caught between a rock and a hard place if they have a problem with excessive use or abuse he says.

“If you admit you have a problem with cannabis then you admit that cannabis is a problematic drug, and if you’re trying to advocate to change the laws you get caught up in a situation where you’re either for or against - that’s really damaging to cannabis users.”

The former teacher of film and media studies says evidence shows legal status of cannabis does not affect the rate at which people use and he agrees with Law Commission recommendations to lessen penalties for personal users.

The Law Commission review of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1975 was tabled in Parliament on May 3 and recommended existing legislation be replaced with a new Act administered by the Ministry of Health

“We need to recognise that the abuse of drugs is both a health and a criminal public policy problem,” said Law Commission president, Justice Grant Hammond.

He says while the law must continue to impose heavy penalties on growers and sellers, there are compelling arguments for adopting a more holistic approach to individual drug offending, particularly when it is driven by addiction.

Part of the proposal is a cautioning scheme for all personal possession and use offences that come to police attention.

This is designed to remove minor drug offenders from the criminal justice system and provide greater opportunities for those in need of treatment.

“Because of UN conventions that we’ve signed as a country, we are not allowed to legalise cannabis. But we can change the law to lessen penalties,” says Savage.

Inside NZ:High Time? airs tonight at 8.30pm on TV3 and On Demand.

3 News
Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

19 Jul 2011 08:38p.m.

Auckland wrote:

I think Savage is totally right on all points with this, and I loved the documentary, well done! 8D

16 Jul 2011 12:04p.m.

nick a wrote:

For those interested there is a movie called "The union"...it is very informative and explains in more depth why its illegal.

14 Jul 2011 10:50p.m.

maggie mccormick wrote:

I was disapointed in how no one had said that it would be good for the ozone.. its also good for making clothes.. strong fibres. the finest lubricating oil in the world. would help our cars .. and clean the air.. you can make paper without dangerous chemicals and toxins that are used in pine to make paper .
new zealand would be able to make the finest clothes.. it would put peopleinto jobs..its not just for smoking and getting high.
take the thc out.. and you get the great fibres.

14 Jul 2011 01:24p.m.

J wrote:

i found it interesting that there was barely any research or evidence privided by those in the documentary that were against the idea of decriminalisation and legalisation all they had was hearsay, propaganda, conservatism and ideology, whereas those for it had the credentials and international research to back evey one of their arguments and professional opinions, anyone else notice this?

14 Jul 2011 11:26a.m.

paula wrote:

i think they laid it on a bit too thick about use by young people. there were far too many talking-head short soundbytes focusing on danger, with very little reminder of the greatest danger, ie. engaging with the black market and law enforcement.

13 Jul 2011 05:22p.m.

SteveO wrote:

Thankyou TV3 for showing a more open minded perspective on cannabis. New Zealanders have nothing to fear from legalising cannabis. In fact it will save the tax payer over $500 million per year. If overseas examples like Portugal are anything to go by, cannabis use rates don't soar, addicts get treated like patients and you create a whole new industry. Treat it like a crime or treat it like an opportunity. Your choice New Zealand.

13 Jul 2011 04:53p.m.

Geraint Scott wrote:

Fantastic that this will be aired, it is time NZ faced up to the reality that cannabis is a perfectly safe drug. There are people alive today who can remember when medical cannabis was common and legal. Also, the woman who is soon to become New Zealand's first saint grew cannabis all over the country to use as a medicine during her time as a nun. I would disagree with the comment that it is addictive. Research has shown that the drug itself is not addictive. People with weaker minds allow themselves to become addicted to 'escaping reality', but the drug itself is non addictive.

13 Jul 2011 03:22p.m.

bOb wrote:

“In particular we wanted people to understand that you can get addicted to cannabis, you can crash your car when you’re stoned, and it is damaging for young people to smoke cannabis." Gosh by their logic alcohol should be illegal as well since it kills far more people, causes far more accidents, violence rape and so on. Even booze is more addictive than weed, most criminals that commit crimes use weed as a cop out, its no where as addictive as other drugs, hell even cigarettes are more addictive. The difference between a 'p' addictive and a 'weed' addictive is extreme, by the sounds of it this program has bit of a agenda of its own.

13 Jul 2011 03:12p.m.

corey wrote:

while i do understand the documentary maker's point on cannabis not having its harms eg. abuse. i believe it should be legalized completely in a regulated market not just decriminalized as outlined here: "He says while the law must continue to impose heavy penalties on growers and sellers, there are compelling arguments for adopting a more holistic approach to individual drug offending, particularly when it is driven by addiction. Part of the proposal is a cautioning scheme for all personal possession and use offences that come to police attention." why do the responsible users have to be warned on a cautioning scheme and treated like they are addicted? why can it not just be regulated and sold in certain r18 shops and clubs like the daktory? as for growing and selling i believe it should be treated like how home-brew alcohol is in New Zealand where it is legal to brew a certain amount but not to sell without a license? the same principle could apply to cannabis in terms of growing? just decriminalizing it will not stop the users from being forced to buy from gangs and "tinnie" houses, nor will it stop the gangs etc being in charge of supply, therefore getting rich off it and harming police resources in both money/time trying to catch and deal with the dealers/growers as well as the potential for those same people's potential to harm police in order to protect their crops. cannabis/hemp has heaps more uses than getting high, one only needs to Google uses of hemp/cannabis to find out. those are the same uses and industries that New Zealand could be taxing and making money from but instead we prefer to jail and criminalize non violent harmful cannabis users and wasting tax dollars. I'm not saying some users aren't bad people or addicted, but the majority are not and to tar everyone with the same brush is ridiculous. if it were legal we could help rehabilitate addicts not throw them in jail and hope it works, because it doesn't. CHANGE CANNABIS LAWS!!

13 Jul 2011 02:14p.m.

Ayobro wrote:

nothing wrong with smoking weed their have been people who've lived too a hundred and weren't any more guilty of leading boring lives then the rest of us, stop letting the goverment tell you what you can and cant put in your body.