• Full Story

Dole payments will be given to employers - Labour

Print

Thu, 01 Sep 2011 12:00p.m.

Labour leader Phil Goff will give youth dole payments to employers as an education subsidy (NZPA file)

Labour leader Phil Goff will give youth dole payments to employers as an education subsidy (NZPA file)

By Lloyd Burr

Labour will give young people's dole payments directly to employers under the guise of “education subsidies” as part of its $251 million 'youth skills and employment package' they announced today.

Labour plans to have all teenagers learning or earning within three years if they were elected to Government.

They also plan to create 5000 new, free training places for 16 and 17 year-olds.

Labour leader Phil Goff says the package targets young people before they leave school and follows them into the workplace.

“We will match skills training within and outside of schools with real job opportunities. We will better inform, mentor and support young people so that they undertake and complete their training,” he says.

“Our package will convert dole payments into incentives for employers to take on additional apprentices.

 “It is crazy to have high youth unemployment alongside a growing skills shortage crisis. It is not about make-work schemes. It is about creating relevant education and training opportunities and providing clear pathways to real jobs,” Mr Goff says.

The package includes:


  • Converting dole payments into a $8700 subsidy for employers, creating 9000 additional apprenticeship places
  • Creating 5000 new free training places for 16 and 17 year olds
  • Creating 1000 extra group and shared apprenticeships
  • Establishing a Youth Transitions Network that would create a future plan for every school leaver

The plan will cost $251 million over four years and Labour says it will be funded by its capital gains tax and “fairer tax plan”.

“It is not a case of whether we can afford to do this. We simply can’t afford not to,” Mr Goff says.

“We will reprioritise $80 million from existing schemes, with $58 million going to the apprenticeship subsidy instead of dole payments, giving a net total cost of $171 million over four years.

“We will spend carefully, but will spend where we need to. We need to do that to prevent an already serious problem from becoming a costly social and economic disaster.”

Mr Goff says the package addresses the “ticking time-bomb” of youth unemployment and “focuses on the 24,000 teenagers who are currently not working or in education or training”.

“These kids are our future but at the moment they are being left on the scrapheap. If we don’t do something now, we will all pay a far higher price. The New Zealand Institute estimates the cost of disengaged youth is $900 million a year.

“What we are proposing is not rocket science; it is common sense.

“Everyone knows that our youth unemployment rate is far too high – our young people represent more of our total unemployment numbers than in any other OECD country,” Mr Goff says.

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

07 Oct 2011 04:14a.m.

James Gollan wrote:

Wow, the young people are going to get meaningful jobs, To do what,make coffee, become prostitutes.Training allowances to be trained as what. Goff, you Keys and Shipley are bereft of any ideas, Your free trade agreements have meant that NZ has become a dumping ground for Chinese rubbish,Your sales of infrastructure has meant that the profits from a local phone call go off shore and those profits are from our export earnings. But these two policies have assisted in the reduction of the Nations skills base.No railway workshops, no ship yards, no shoe factories, little domestic engineering.Get real start creating meaningful jobs, improve the skill base and protect NZ industry from cheap shonky rubbish that the standard of living in this country can not compete with the sweat shop labour rates paid in our so call free trade partner countries. Nothing is free and in this case it is our young who are paying the pricde

09 Sep 2011 02:18p.m.

sam wrote:

having skills that they use for a life time great idea from Labour party! were we have the National party and there great idea of throw money at community max was just shocking!!

06 Sep 2011 09:58p.m.

george wrote:

Well done labour!! It is always a great policy making another segment of society dependent on govt handouts. There is an old adge which states that is if you give a man a fish you feed him for a day, if you teach a man to fish you feed him for life". Labour stop making the majority of NZers benefiaries. Dependance on the state lends to disaster. It is ntime for people to be accountable and make their own choices. Clarke I see you are noticeably absent from this debate!!

06 Sep 2011 08:10p.m.

zac wrote:

Another credible policy by labour. It will be just a matter of time before national steals this idea.

06 Sep 2011 12:59a.m.

Davo wrote:

@JIM - National comes up with new ideas alright, mostly to screw over the people responsible for creating the wealth of some of their most affluent members.

05 Sep 2011 06:06p.m.

JIM wrote:

unlike national its good to see labour comes up with new ideas, unlike national .

02 Sep 2011 06:41p.m.

ThePlan wrote:

Lets compare major party policies by examining their properties as vectors. National's policy is moving in the wrong direction for youth and excessive magnitude. While Labour's policy is moving the right direction with insufficient magnitude. There are considerably more than 15000 out of work youth. Whats the plan for the other 50000? As for National's poor direction what's the point of preventing people from learning to handle money. The learn process requires mistakes. National's policy only leads to delaying the learning good money habits. The longer you leave it, the more persistent bad habits become. The youth may eventually get low payed work but they will have problems spending it wisely and in some case it may interfere with their work.

02 Sep 2011 07:31a.m.

eddie wrote:

Ahhh Hyprocricy from the left again with their posts. If National had proposed this policy you would all be screaming that businesses will gain and rip off the youth and Key just handing out kids dole $$$'s to business owners etc etc, but since it's Labour who have suggested it, all of a sudden these same businesses will not rip of anyone and will behave and no leftie poster has mentioned this part of businesses getting Govt money to pay kids....you gotta laugh!

02 Sep 2011 07:11a.m.

braam wrote:

What happened to Technical High schools? teach them skills while at school so they have their mind made up when they finish?

01 Sep 2011 06:16p.m.

Phred wrote:

Why not try something radical and totally unheard of? Scrap the dole. Put young people into five-year apprenticeships after a short familiarisation at the job to ensure their interest. Then have them go to polytech on a regular basis to learn just how much better their employer is at the realities of doing a job. After five years they will have a worthwhile skill which an employer is happy to pay for, instead of a worthless piece of paper and no ability to do the job, yet still expect a good salary.