3News » Home

Dreaming of not being a politician

Shane Jones had a sticky couple of days due to porn watching on the taxpayer revelations Shane Jones had a sticky couple of days due to porn watching on the taxpayer revelations
Tue, 15 Jun 2010 11:05a.m.

By Philip Patston

On Sunday afternoon while discussing with friends the week's political credit card revelations and other minor happenings, I said that anyone who volunteers for political office proves, by the act of volunteering, that they shouldn't be a politician.

That night I dreamt that I had been elected MP for Wellington. I saw myself on the streets of the capital city, being congratulated by people young and old. They assured me I would make a difference, change the world and watch lots of porn.

Actually I made up the bit about the porn, but the rest really happened – it was a perplexing dream.

I have said in the past – at a university orientation gig in fact – that if I ever stand for parliament, someone should congratulate me on getting to my feet. Then they should shoot me , which would be better than having my throat cut.

Why? Because wanting to be a politician means two things:

1. You have a big enough ego to think you should lead the country; and/or

2. You are naive enough to think you can significantly change anything using the political system.

Politicians fall into two camps in my book: egotistical megalomaniacs and benevolent innocents. Some of them I have known and liked, predominantly of the latter persuasion, but I don't think they should have been politicians. A few have now left politics – the others have switched camps, I fear.

There's another camp – just plain stupid – but we all know who runs that one with a Pay TV remote.

Don't ask me what the alternative is – I'm still working on it. But here are a few of my thoughts about a leadership system that I might put my hand up for:

1. It would be collaborative and not oppositional.

2. It would be driven from a local level, with representatives forming regional and national forums.

3. It would be focussed on relationships between people being the key drivers towards economic, environmental and social development.

4. It would understand and promote the notions of diversity, creativity and change as keys to an emergent, rather than established, society.

5. In its quest for excellence, it would be forever questioning itself and others as to its impact and relevance.

So, what do you think? Am I dreaming? Whether I am or not please, don't shoot me.

 

Until 2008 Philip Patston identified as gay, disabled and vegetarian. These days he prefers to think of himself as having a unique experience. A social entrepreneur and change consultant, with fifteen years’ experience as an award-winning professional comedian, he aims to promote a new, more useful understanding of diversity. He runs Diversity New Zealand in his spare time (www.diversitynz.com).

 

You can keep in touch with Philip Patston via his social media sites:

 

facebook.com/philippatston

 

twitter.com/philippatston

 

Please vote for this blog in the NetGuide Web Awards.

Philip Patston's Entries

Comments [7]

Craig
20/06/2010 3:05:27 p.m.

Incidentally, though, Philip, would the smut in question be inclusive smut, incorporating cute disabled guys? If not, why watch it?

Craig Young
16/06/2010 12:44:49 p.m.

Granted, although I'd make the case that even if the Invalids Benefit is seen as 'demeaning' by some, there is the question of total immiseration if it is removed. I am thinking particularly of people with psychiatric disabilities who have experienced significant educational and employment related disruption in this context, which would lead to substance abuse, homelessness and antisocial behaviour.

I do agree, we need a greater focus on enablement and social citizenship. However, given the current ideological persuasion of this government, we'll have to wait for the next Labour/Green coalition. How does the idea of a seperate Disability Commissioner and Charter of Intellectually Disabled Peoples Rights grab you?

Philip
16/06/2010 7:41:20 a.m.

Where do I start, Craig?! Party MPs could start by having more meaningful dialogues with people with unique function, one-on-one, over coffee, over a beer. Real, personal engagement, not "consultation" with organisations. Policy wise, for a start, we need to be creative over benefit reform. Vegetating on a benefit is demeaning and wasteful of human resources. But the current labour market is too inflexible to create opportunity for everyone. People with capacity that doesn't match the labour pool need state assistance to survive, but there is no reason why they couldn't negotiate a civic contribution that matches their capability. These would be "designed jobs", created to suit a unique set of attributes and skillset. It's not like everything in society gets done, so there's heaps of scope to design some pretty unique civic contributions. Other woefully inadequate systems are disability and education support - they are currently deficit-based, ie. forcing people to make a case for how incapable they are without support rather than how capable they could be with it. There - and, as I said – that's just for starters!

Craig Young
15/06/2010 5:22:46 p.m.

I stand corrected. What can existing political parties do to promote affirmative policies that enhance disability rights?

Apart from insurance discrimination, what policies would you like to see enacted on a concrete level?

Philip Patston
15/06/2010 4:20:27 p.m.

In fact there have been MPs with the experience of disability - Margaret Wilson has post-polio syndrome and George Hawkins had a stroke. Neither had the awareness, unfortunately, to identify, advocate and promote disability as a political issue. Shame.

Gav
15/06/2010 3:22:24 p.m.

I agree with this to a large extent - I have always thought that those who pursue power are exactly the sort of people who shouldn't have it.

Craig
15/06/2010 3:01:53 p.m.

Speaking of diversity, why is it that this country has never had any MPs with disabilities? An interesting question, which I hope you'll answer (or is it because people with disabilities have far better things to do with their time!)

Post a comment

Name:
Email: (Won't be published)
Comment:


3News Video 3News Audio