Thu, 28 Jun 2012 6:08p.m.
The Deputy Prime Minister has raised the idea of mandatory drug tests for all people claiming benefits.
Read the full story »
Post a Comment
Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide
(Won't be published)
25/09/2012 10:01:21 p.m.
The purpose of the dole is not to bankroll a bad or illegal habit,and would it not be misappropriation of government funds for this to occur?
The dole is not earned nor is the DPB, therefore it is the benefactor who should call the shots.
I get alcohol tested every morning and am subject to random drug testing as per Au Mining Policy
and I accept this as a condition of employment.
As for people with kids accept that having them is a choice, a choice to have them or a choice to be irreponsible either way its a choice, so why should I pay for someone else's mistake or selfishness?
29/08/2012 11:02:22 p.m.
Drug testing is personally invasive, it's disgusting to treat ordinary human beings like prison inmates. Bennet got where she is from people like me paying taxes in our low income jobs, and now that I need a bit of help, she slams us. It's quite frankly quite sickening. I hope the greens have a bit of power in them to try and stop her in her with the drug testing.
7/07/2012 8:51:49 a.m.
This will be a great tool to sort those who are competent for employment and those who are just using the dole to get stoned and waste taxpayer’s money.
3/07/2012 6:19:25 p.m.
Oh goody- presumably anyone who has the care of any children-( as surely that has more responsibility than for a machine)-and who gets ANY govt assistance too?..foster parents,low income families,childcare workers,teachers,coaches..where to draw the line in terms of responsibility and accountability for receipt of govt assistance??
1/07/2012 3:44:06 p.m.
Worried West Aucklander wrote:
A police report made a few months ago about a particular West Auckland cud-de-sac fully fenced house being frequented by a lot of cars was a waste of time. Up to now, no action was taken...and all concerned neighbours are wondering what else can they do?
29/06/2012 4:46:12 p.m.
As long as National party members all get tested every month, at random, between now and then!! Key slurs often enough, you'd think he was half drunk or high on something.
29/06/2012 12:42:41 p.m.
Matt Riley wrote:
@ Katrina. "What human rights do people have when their new fellow employee turns up to work with impaired ability due to drugs putting everyone else at risk?"
Have a think about this statement Katrina. The legal status of drugs has nothing to do with what effect the drug has on people. You make the assumption that a person who tests positive for an illicit drug is going to be a danger to anyone around them. This is absurd and falls to pieces under any analysis. Should we also test for caffeine, nicotine, alcohol, zoloft, ritalin, valium, serapax, cymbalta etc, the list goes on? These are all legal drugs which effect a persons state of mind.
This policy is about oppression of people and keeping the enormous profit margins of pharmaceutical, alcohol and oil companies chugging along.
It is ignorant statements like yours which allow them to get away with it. Please think about this. Don't allow the 'anti drug propaganda machine' of the corporations do your thinking for you.
29/06/2012 11:52:46 a.m.
@Thinker New Zealand has a strong homeless population, this was brought about by Nationals welfare attacks in the 1990's.
Its just illegal for them to be in the inner city... try a piece of bush close by or under a bridge... there are more of them now than there have ever been and withholding benefit money will just increase the size of our homeless groups.
As we have seen though... when they are forced onto the streets their drug addictions just become far worse and pronounced and lead to increased crime.
29/06/2012 11:08:10 a.m.
I think you'll find once again, this policy is already in place and therefore, once again the National party is trying to make out they are doing something new, when they already do drug test beneficiaries. On the issue of drugs in our society, if you allow alcohol it is completely unjustified to then prohibit other drugs. Any arguement against alcohol not being in the same category is non-sensical. The science, the studies are clear. One standard for all, beneficiaries, workers, teachers, doctors, politicians etc..... we all benefit in one way or another from the tax system...Also are you beneficiary bashers out there aware that a large proportion of our population receives family assistance and accomodation supplements to feed their families - these are administered through IRD and WINZ. If you earn the average income of 60K and have a couple of kids, hard working or not, you are a beneficiary in this country. Why don't you attack these people too? Or what about the wealthy who received tax cuts?
29/06/2012 10:37:38 a.m.
If the unemployments refuses your threats then would you send them to a slavery slum without their right away to benefit?Breath test should apply to all the working people in this country and not only the beneficaries, and since when Bill English took up Police Work? you are a big joke Pal..Human rights must STAND..
Finance Minister Bill English joins The Nation in the studio to discuss the Budget.
Finance Minister Bill English says it was good to have $900 million to spend in his latest Budget.
Minister of Finance Bill English has given a speech about the Budget 2013.
In announcing his fifth Budget, Finance Minister Bill English today said the Government is on track to return to surplus - but debt is yet to peak.
Bill English has made a big promise ahead of tomorrow's budget.
Te Papa is our national museum but is it now a national disg...
Nineteen-year-old Abby Benge's life hung in the balance just...
When a Rotorua couple lost their much loved family dog five ...
What exactly are in these drugs, and how were they invented?...
What began as a protest for more pay has morphed into a batt...
Copyright © 2013 MediaWorks TV. All Rights Reserved.