Drunk driver: convicted 26 times, jailed 12 times

Print

Drunk driver: convicted 26 times, jailed 12 times

3News NZ

Raymond Laing in court

Raymond Laing in court

By Emma Jolliff

The man believed to be New Zealand’s worst drunk driver has just been jailed for his 26th conviction.

Raymond Charles Laing was almost three times over the legal breath alcohol limit when he was last caught.

His car had been seen weaving all over Kennedy Rd in Napier and mounting the kerb.

It was the 31st time he had been caught driving while disqualified and this is the 12th time he has been jailed.

“You have 16 pages of criminal convictions including violence, drugs, dishonesty, drink driving and driving while disqualified,” Judge Richard Watson said in sentencing today.

The court heard how over the years, Laing has been sentenced to prison, suspended sentences, supervision, periodic detention – but nothing has deterred him from drink driving.

Laing faced a maximum of four years’ jail, but got an automatic discount for an early plea. He will serve three years in jail; 18 months for drunk driving and 18 for driving while disqualified.

Laing has been disqualified for a further five years.

“That’s the maximum sentence I’m able to impose,” Judge Watson said.

In a letter to the judge, Laing said when he last got out of prison he tried for nine weeks to get counselling.

“Events around you culminated in perhaps, depression, and you reverted to what you knew best – consuming alcohol – and you made the poor choice to drive,” Judge Watson said.

Laing is believed to be New Zealand’s worst drink-driving offender.

“As the ads say; he’s a bloody idiot,” says Police prosecutor Sergeant Malcolm Lochrie.

“One day they’re going to kill someone. Let’s hope it’s not one of ours.”

Alcohol counsellor Roger Brooking says such reoffending proves there is a problem with the justice system.

“I would like to see compulsory drug and alcohol assessments on every driver on his second offence within a 10-year period.

The Sensible Sentencing Trust says repeat drunk drivers should be treated like violence offenders; because while their choice of weapon is different, the outcome is often the same.

3 News

 

 

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

8/07/2012 12:37:45 a.m.

Judy wrote:

Yes the system definitely needs work, this should have been mounted and delt with closely 27 convictions AGO!!!! there are rapists PREDATORS worse than Raymond, at least we know what his problem is! I believe it has something to do with his childhood that attention thing we all crave one time or another. Under all of this is probably a child screaming out for help that never comes :(

7/07/2012 11:02:04 a.m.

hitler wrote:

they need a solution for this man, they need to make it a "final solution"

7/07/2012 10:47:28 a.m.

James J.Read wrote:

Unfortunately, Ann Marie, politicians are unlikely to support your extreme hard line position. I would be satisfied with the preposed alcohol law changes if they keep drunk drivers off the road and will e-mail this view to my M.P.

7/07/2012 7:38:05 a.m.

Mike wrote:

he need to be ban from ever owning a car and ban from buying any Alcohol and have his driver licence take of him for good.

7/07/2012 12:40:07 a.m.

Huang wrote:

Our country club jails are no real deterent for this driver. Pointless talking about compulsory drug and alcohol assessment for this guy. He is no idiot, as getting caught entitles him to free food and accommodation. Our only hope is he drink drives and kills himself without injuring others.

6/07/2012 10:44:50 p.m.

Bennii Cortellis wrote:

australia have an excellent way to combat this . . . repeat offenders have imobilisers installed in their cars. . . every 5-20 minutes (depending on severity of offences) the driver must blow into a testing device which is connected to the immobiliser. if the driver fails the standard drink/drug test, the car is immediately shut down.

6/07/2012 8:43:03 p.m.

James J.Read wrote:

This case is the best argument I have seen for adopting Canada's solution.THere,he would get a mandatory sentence of 5 years imprisonment and there would be time to complete an addiction treatment course

6/07/2012 8:32:12 p.m.

katrina wrote:

Three strikes he should be out. Out of the public arena. He is hazard to society

6/07/2012 7:23:06 p.m.

nigel wrote:

It’s almost annoying that Mr Laing has not had a serious crash, then we could all go Aha we told you so. But thus far, decades of drunken driving, haven’t resulted in so much as a puncture. Mr Laing could rightly say in his capacity as New Zealand’s most notorious drunken driver that he is also our safest drunken driver and he has the record to prove it, how’s that for irony.

6/07/2012 7:20:21 p.m.

Ann-Marie Scott wrote:

I think the law needs to be a lot tougher. A life sentence should be life sentence, locking people away for life. We need to change. We are not tough enough for sentencing. We need to be like America with their sentencing. We need longer jail time. And no parole.