3News » Home

Edison Hour versus Earth Hour

Wed, 31 Mar 2010 1:49p.m.

By Phoebe Hunt

Turning off the lights last Saturday to show support for WWF's Earth Hour, inspired me once more with hope for humanity. Hundreds, thousands, maybe millions of people joined forces to show they care about climate change and will commit to prevent it. Some may say Earth Hour is a one-off event, but realistically for many it is a commitment to long-term energy reductions.

While thousands of us down the country actively turned off, others turned on. Edison Hour was planned to coincide with Earth Hour, to promote the use of power and technology rather than the conservation. Edison Hour celebrants were expected once more to not only switch lights on, but also other appliances such as lawn mowers and other petroleum-powered products.

This completely shocks and disappoints me. With scientists worldwide proving that human induced climate change is occurring, their actions are naïve and frustrating.

What I fail to understand is the Edison Hour supporters claiming to be celebrating the “advancement of mankind”. I can see that we have achieved great success technologically and through engineering, but at what cost? With the success, we have caused destruction and devastation - poverty, hunger and disease just for starters. What exactly are we advancing to?

I feel we are continually living life one-way. We create and throw away, we burn and emit, we use and don’t replace - again and again. Where does it stop? When will the cycle be complete? Always taking and not replacing is not sustainable. We must reduce what we use and maintain our remaining resources. Actions now may save our future.

Climate change is not an environmental issue. It is a social issue. The effects of climate change now and in the future affect us all. The time to act is now.

 

The UNICEF Climate Kiwis are five young New Zealanders committed to working on the issue of climate change.

 

Erana Walker, Rick Zwaan, Phoebe Hunt, Travis Mills and Abby Ward were selected by UNICEF in partnership with Enviro-challenge to represent New Zealand at the UNICEF Children’s Climate Forum in Copenhagen in 2009.

 

They returned determined to address the issue of climate change and prepare for the COP16 in Mexico this December.

 

Each week a different Climate Kiwi shares their thoughts and experiences here. 

 

Comments [20]

V
16 May 2010 08:25p.m.

its obvious the Young Unicef kiwis where not selected for their science abilities.

Liz
12 Apr 2010 04:11p.m.

Awesome blog post Phoebe. I think it is great that you are thinking about the social consequences as well as the environmental consequences. NZ needs more passionate young people like you.

Graham
01 Apr 2010 08:54p.m.

I always supported the WWF...UNTIL THEY GOT INVOLVED IN GLOBAL WARMING...SORRY CLIMATE CHANGE. I will not support them now while they ram down my thoat repaeated propaganda on how bad I am to live on this planet.Get back to what you were set up to do and dont get involved in the spin doctoring, corrupt, deceptive world of climate, dominated by those who want to make a lot of money out of all this.

mark
01 Apr 2010 05:52p.m.

for those who claim global warming or 'now' climate change you continued verve demonstrates truly, truly, truly just how sad and how dumbed down society has become. wiki reference....my god. you need help. this global warming cult is the same devisive mechanism that created hitlers 3rd reich. i sense the only time you will come to terms with 'what' this is about - which you have FAILED to do - is when the first mascres occur. YES, when the first mascres occur. "If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face -- forever"

Abby
01 Apr 2010 03:56p.m.

Phoebe's article is very well-thought out, I think we do need to challenge today's perception of 'growth', instead of basing in purely on economic 'progress'. Well done Phoebe for having to courage to speak your mind:)

Hamish
01 Apr 2010 11:58a.m.

It's a shame that some people resort to personal attacks on issues like this. There's much room for intelligent debate obviously, all part of the awareness raising process. I have read the evidence for anthropogenic climate change and believe that humans are accelerating global warming, however I am open to assessing evidence to say that it's not happening without resorting to name-calling. I challenge the personal attackers here to put forward their cases intelligently, insult-free. This would mean they are taken more seriously for one thing.

pip
01 Apr 2010 11:43a.m.

It isn't about global warming. It is about climate change. Those who refuse to acknowledge this phenomenon, look at the African continent. They are having droughts and desertification. Look at the Pacific Islands. They are struggling with numerous cyclones and rising sea levels. Go talk to people from outside of New Zealand. Take the time to learn the stories of these people, and see how climate change isn't some abstract future thought - it is something that is affecting people's lives now.

kim jonanneson
01 Apr 2010 11:36a.m.

Shows who the real gutless ones are. especially you johnny, haven't seen you writing any blogs and clearly you can't even write a full name on your post. think it's time for people like you to wake up and look at the facts. this stuff just doesn't happen naturally obviously it's not a scam. biased article it may be but any different to what you are posting. at least it's written in a professional manner. Good on tv 3 for publishing this they are obviously not fools like you non believers and understand. there are always two sides to a story but responding in this manner is just cowardly, at least some of us are worthy enough to make into the media, sounds like an uneducated fool that writes this sort of thing in reply. it's people like you who are ruining our clean green image. We don't really want you here so if you have that opinion leave. it'll make New Zealand a better place.

James
01 Apr 2010 11:27a.m.

To all those who deny global warming, what do you say to Synthesis Reports, such as the ones mentioned here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change (I know, it's Wikipedia, but the links are valid).

David
01 Apr 2010 11:00a.m.

there is a mid-ground. the awareness factor of earth hour is absolutely commendable! but, burning candles and letting off carbon emissions is definately not the way to raise awareness! driving you car to an even to create awareness about stopping carbon emissions is not the way! people need to realise that it isn't sensible to create awareness of carbone emissions by emitting more carbon into the air. but edison hour is a joke! to say that we should be using technology with the deliberate intention to create a greater stress on the planet is a joke. we need to be focussing on what earth hour stands for, but in a completely non-polluting way. unfortunately, to date, all earth hour achieves is "warm-fuzzies" while creating more pollution than is reduced, simply by shifting the problem elsewhere for 1 hour a year.

Post a comment

Name:
Email: (Won't be published)
Comment:


3News Video 3News Audio

Blogs