Full Story

Utopia

Election 2011: Backtracks, backdowns and flip-flops

Wed, 23 Nov 2011 12:00p.m.

Key, Goff and Apiata - one of these things is not like the other

Key, Goff and Apiata - one of these things is not like the other


Thomas More

An alternative look at the New Zealand election, with writing from the 3news.co.nz team.


By James Ryan and Dan Satherley

From Melissa Lee's fraught by-election campaign to the sensitive issue of the role of our troops in Afghanistan, here's the top backtracks, backdowns and flip-flops from our politicians during the last three years of Government.

With the election looming, the integrity of our politicians is coming under scrutiny.

We let you be the judge.

Watch the video by clicking the 'view video' link on the left.

THE MINIMUM WAGE

One of the most contentious election issues is National's policy to lower the minimum wage. They want to lower the youth rate from $13 to $10.90.

The idea behind this is that any raising of the wage rates will cost jobs as they say employers will not be able to afford to employ people at this or a higher rate.

Labour disputes this claim, and wants to raise the overall minimum wage rate to $15.

National released Department of Labour documents in support of their claim stating that a "rise in minimum wage will cost 6000 jobs".

But 3 News recently obtained Treasury documents that dispute this claim. These Treasury documents are quoted as saying "This (rise in minimum wage) has not been true in the past. The balance of probabilities is that a higher minimum wage does not cost jobs."

RETIREMENT AGE

Raising the age of superannuation from 65 to 67 is one of Labour's bold new election policies, designed to decrease public spending.

The policy is to increase the age of retirement by two months per year from 2020 so that it will have reached its mark of 67 by 2033. This would bring New Zealand into line with Australia, the United States and the United Kingdom. This policy however, is a u-turn on Labour's previous stance not to increase the retirement age.

In 2008 Labour finance spokesman David Cunliffe said: "The party is committed to retaining the age of eligibility at 65."
But Phil Goff says: "Policy evolved as circumstances changed", referring to the uncertain global financial situation.

MELISSA LEE

Ms Lee has been one of the most gaffe-prone politicians in recent years.

She has been accused of a conflict of interest over her ownership of Asia Vision Limited and her use of taxpayer money to produce a National Party advertisement and an election special featuring Pansy Wong, another Asian National MP.

She was also ordered to pay back $100,000 of unspent contingency funds after NZ on Air uncovered what she described as a "technical accounting mistake".

Just before the new internet Copyright Amendment Bill was passed under urgency she tweeted she was going to bed to "listen to a comp a friend did for me of K Pop".

One of her biggest gaffes came during a meeting in the run up to the Mt Albert by election, which she unsuccessfully campaigned for. She was quoted as saying "the new motorway will stop criminals coming from South Auckland and committing crime in Mt Albert". She was forced to back down after widespread public outcry.

She apologised by saying "I was wrong to imply crime is a solely South Auckland problem, I sincerely regret my comments."

AFGHANISTAN

The role of our defence forces in Afghanistan was called to question after two SAS troops were killed in firefights within the space of a month.

Lance Corporal Leon Smith and Corporal Doug Grant were killed in what appeared to be frontline action.

The Government consistently described the SAS as being in a "mentoring" role to the local Afghan forces, not unlike the provincial reconstruction team based in Bamiyan province. The Prime Minister was accused of "sugar-coating" the role of the SAS and misleading the public.

After the two SAS deaths, media pressed Defence Minister Wayne Mapp to clarify. He was forced to admit that they were indeed involved in a "substantial combat" role.

The same day, Prime Minister John Key was asked the same question and denied this.  

CANNABIS

New ACT leader Don Brash made a surprise move when he voiced his opposition to current cannabis laws during an ACT Party meeting.

The shift in policy caught his own party off guard, notably high-profile party member John Banks who is hoping to secure the vital Epsom electorate.

Mr Banks is well known for his social conservatism and strong stance on law and order. He exploded in vocal opposition, causing embarrassment and a public rift between the two lynchpins of the increasingly fragile party.

HARAWIRA BY-ELECTION

Disenchanted with the Maori Party-National coalition government, Hone Harawira left the Maori Party and set up his own, the Mana Party.

Mana brought together anti-capitalist and ultra left-wing ideologies and Maori protest movements.

The renegade MP announced a by-election in the seat of Te Tai Tokerau just hours after saying this was not his plan.

"That's not my agenda at the moment," he told TV3's The Nation, just hours before announcing the by-election.

He apologised to the media and anyone he had misled.

GST INCREASE

One of the most contentious decisions taken by the National Government has been to raise GST (Goods and Services Tax) from 12.5 to 15 percent.

There was much opposition to this, at a period when households are already struggling with a higher price of living.

Before the 2008 election National issued their policy of tax cuts, pledging not to increase GST.

John Key was quoted as saying: "It would take a lot of convincing [to raise GST]."

SOCIAL WELFARE PAYMENT CARDS

Social Welfare Minister Paula Bennett rubbished the idea of a payment card for youth before backtracking and introducing it after the Prime Minister championed the idea.

The payment card is intended to be used by young beneficiaries to buy food and other household items, and stop them using taxpayer money to buy cigarettes and alcohol.

Ms Bennett had previously written in a letter: "Such oversight by the Crown would be highly intrusive and rob individuals of their freedom of choice."

John Key, after National announced the social policy, explained; "If it sounds a bit hands on for you, I make no apologies."
Labour labelled the affair as "hypocritical".  

KEY ON THE BRAIN DRAIN

One of the most widely talked-about promises from National during the 2008 election was to stop the "brain drain", or siphoning of skilled New Zealanders to Australia, seeking highly-paid employment.

Mr Key promised he would stem this flow, but statistics show more New Zealanders are going offshore to work now than ever before.

Statistics New Zealand records show during the month of July 2011 alone, 3200 Kiwis left New Zealand to live in Australia, the highest number ever recorded.

In the past year 84,000 Kiwis left New Zealand, with 48,000 destined for Australia.

Before the 2008 election Mr Key blamed the flow on Labour, saying: "I think it’s pretty sad when New Zealand starts becoming world champion for exporting people to Australia. What it shows is that it is an increasing number of New Zealanders are fed up with being underpaid, over-taxed and having a Government that constantly tells them what to do with their lives."

National is blaming the increase on the economy, saying that we suffered a much greater recession than what was felt in Australia.

Opposition leader Phil Goff called the Government's failure to stem the tide “embarrassing”.

“They’ve failed absolutely," said Mr Goff. "Under John Key’s watch 100,000 New Zealanders have left permanently for Australia. The wage gap hasn’t narrowed, it’s got wider.”

WINSTON PETERS ON ASSET SALES

The leader of a resurgent New Zealand First Party, Winston Peters, is, like Labour, strongly against the sale of state-owned assets this election.

The New Zealand First election manifesto states: “Strategic state asset sales will cease. If considered appropriate and only when absolutely necessary, management by private contracts under public ownership will replace the policy of state asset sales.” Also read on the NZ First homepage: “We pledge to do everything possible not to sell off our revenue generating assets like the power companies.”

Yet in 2008 Peters wanted to privatise Kiwibank, one of our best-performing state assets. In a speech given in Tauranga on October 24, Mr Peters proposed Kiwibank be used as stand-alone commercial bank, separate from the Government. Furthermore, the bank would handle business by the Government, which he estimated at $55 billion, and only New Zealanders could hold shares in the bank.

He claimed that this would force interest rates to lower by keeping profits from this business in New Zealand. Green co-leader Russel Norman claimed the move would lead to overseas ownership. Jim Anderton, leader of the Progressives, even labelled Mr Peters a “serial asset-seller”.

PHIL GOFF ON ASSET SALES

Phil Goff has made a strong stand against National's proposed partial sale of state-owned assets. The Labour party has made this the backbone of their current election campaign. National wants to sell up to 49 percent of assets such as power companies like Mighty River Power to free up $5 to $7 billion for future investment.

John Key says; “National will put the proceeds of mixed ownership which as I said is between $5 and $7 billion into a new fund called the future investment fund.”

However, back in 1988 Mr Goff was part of of a Labour Government under David Lange that implemented far-reaching free market economic reforms. During this time Mr Goff voted against a bill that would have "guaranteed the ownership of assets strategically important to New Zealand" (Hon Warren Cooper, Otago).

Mr Cooper wanted to keep Government ownership of asset sales at a minimum of 75%.

Mr Goff, according to Hansard, voted "no" over the Petroleum Corporation Of New Zealand Limited (Retention of New Zealand Ownership and Control) Bill.  This bill was created by Mr Cooper and others in opposition to the proposed sale of publicly owned Petrocorp to overseas company British Gas. 

CREDIT DOWNGRADES

Prime Minister John Key made a comment during Parliamentary debate that under a Labour Government, New Zealand's credit rating would suffer.

Apparently Standard and Poor's made this comment during a meeting at which one of Key's unknown "sources" was in attendance.

The claim turned out to be false.

This year, under Mr Key's watch, Standard and Poor's downgraded New Zealand’s credit rating, following a decision by Fitch to lower the country from a AA+ to AA.

Standard and Poor's downgraded New Zealand's long-term foreign currency ratings from AA+ to AA and its long-term local currency rating on New Zealand to AA+ from AAA.

Labour leader Phil Goff says the downgrade is proof of the Government's economic mismanagement.

"The downgrade is a clear judgment of National's failure to get the economy growing and to deal with New Zealand's long term problems."

He said it showed why Labour's plan to introduce a capital gains tax to redirect investment into the economy and pay back debt without selling assets was so important.

Mr Key has made no apology for his comments and repeatedly stated it was his source, not he, who was he was privy to the meeting with Standard and Poor's.

He refused to name his source.

3 News

• Live updates from the election campaign – click here

Comments

24 Nov 2011 09:46p.m.

Cantab wrote:

Surely the point here is not about our luck or lot in life ...its about a nation that should be able to be heard, to expect honesty and integrity, and when someone says they are going to do something they should do it!

24 Nov 2011 06:57p.m.

Kiwi wrote:

Interesting what one finds in the archives.And this was in August 2008:3News has been in contact with the person who made the secret recordings of Bill English at the National Party Conference on Friday night,who had further secret recordings of Lockwood Smith.The recordings,where Smith was talking to conference delegates,suggest the National Party have a secret agenda.Smith was recorded as saying:"There's some bloody dead fish you have to swallow..to get into Government to do the kinds of things you want to do.. and you have to balance up what really matters.If you try to do everything differently you'll scare the horses and under MMP it's very hard to win.Once we have gained the confidence of the people,we've got more chance of doing more things."He went on to talk about doing things in government that you could not talk about before an election."We may be able to do some things we believe we need to do,perhaps go through a discussion document process..you wouldn't be able to do them straight off..I'm hoping that we'll do some useful things that way,that may not be policy right now."
National defended itself on the comments made by Bill English,recorded secretly at the National Party Conference on Friday night.English was secretly recorded telling delegates at his Party's weekend conference National would eventually sell Kiwibank - today he retracted.But an eventual sale was very much English's private view just three days ago - and perhaps he was caught out telling the truth,but he has put it down to loose language.National's policy is not to sell state assets in its first term. Today Key seemed to write new policy on the hoof,indicating Kiwibank would never come up for sale.In the secret recording English also suggested his leader did not understand the government's Working for Families programme.
English claims he was misunderstood.
And this was long before the 2008 General Election.Makes one wonder about National its and "credibility" more and more.

24 Nov 2011 05:51p.m.

Rich wrote:

Dear KK, you are obviously very angry and bitter about your lot in life. Mines not to good either, but the difference is, I dont blame the Govt for every little thing that happens to me. I sort it out by evaluating the problem what do I have to do to get over it or what do I have to sell, and then...., I actually do somthing about it. Imagine that! Its not easy I know but life is what YOU make it, not what others make it. My dad used to say ' life is not fair' he was wrong. Life is life. Its what you do with it and how you react.

24 Nov 2011 03:10p.m.

Karl wrote:

So the majority of the backtracks and flip flops are from Mr key and National...what a suprise

23 Nov 2011 11:30p.m.

Rude Awakening wrote:

Uh huh, this is for you. Why would a educated MP want to sell his car to pay for a taxi, is that not what the selling off of the assets would mean?
The problem is not who is educated or not, but who could be stupid enough to think it is a good idea.
Welcome to planet earth......

23 Nov 2011 10:18p.m.

Cat wrote:

Prior to the last election John Key stated the natural level of the kiwi was 55c U.S. Why has he done nothing about the overvalued exchange rate?

23 Nov 2011 09:00p.m.

Kiwi wrote:

If Key was not PM and saw his minimum wage(if he was just a low paid commoner like many of us in NZ)drop would he be happy about it?I don't think so.He would pull out of NZ and head "over the ditch" to Australia for the best way to make ends meet.John Key can afford to retire but not many NZers can.If/when he becomes a former MP the taxpayer will be helping his travel costs etc.
Afganistan:A war on terrorism declared by George W Bush and still raging 10 years on.The Afghan conflict has been going on for more than 30 years.Even with the Soviets.
Lets not go there in regards to Hone and cannabis.One is good for ones' health(to those who need it for medical reasons)and one has no great in opinion of him overall by the larger community.He may as well steal cars.
GST increase:a major promise broken by National.1 out of 10 in brownie points.
Melissa Lee and Pansy Wong obviously viewed the tax-payer as a gravy train to be milked as much as possible.And yet is this not the attitude of many politicians in both central and local government?
National in the 1990s tried a theory of reducing benefit payments.It did not work.
To date there has been numerous FTAs with countries who do not intend to be of benefit to NZ and NZers.Asset sales could be National's way of selling NZ from under our feet.
John Keys appears to absolutely adore scaremongering.Reduced credit ratings if change of government.NZ security lost if NZ First gets in.What an excellent opportunity or more to scare us into voting National in a democracy that gives us freedom of choice as to whom we vote for or not.
For every hard working NZer that leaves this beautiful country every day of the past few years for the greener pastures of achievement then each political party is losing a voter.Funny that politicians don't realise that.
Is it too much to ask for decent standards of living,education and health?We do have our future to seriously consider!

23 Nov 2011 03:40p.m.

Molly wrote:

What about Key being heard he love to see wages drop, the mining of conservation land, Child poverty becoming out of hand, the new working poor, the bailout of finance companies, the poor and slow handling of Rena and the bad handling of transport regarding the world cup, English saying National were in good shape when they took office, the cuts of ACE Education that resulted in schools closing, the cuts to special needs that also resulted in schools closing and services cut, the throat slitting incident, the poor handling of state housing, Higher ECE costs, High unemployment and no jobs, Key saying we are recovering aggressively from the recession (yeah right). The list goes on. Seriously who in their right mind would vote National?

23 Nov 2011 02:33p.m.

Uh huh wrote:

A lot of luck in life KK? The hard work and education I guess is part of that luck. Maybe if you worked harder you might get luckier? This notion that people are rich through luck, circumstance, or 'the system' is just rubbish. People who fail all too often blame everything but themselves, and sour grapes about the success of others usually follows. Indeed, why are National polling so high... indeed.

23 Nov 2011 01:31p.m.

KK wrote:

So why are National polling so high? This is an argument for Green/Labour, or anyone bar National, Government second only to that child poverty doco last night. We have to change this culture fast. I would add inclusiveness to the list above– National has gone on about 'underclasses', 'state house visiting Key' and even ensured 'The Smile and Wave' visited the least National of all institutions, the League match, yet top five candidates on their list? White, rich, male, middle-aged and all having a lot of luck in life. Representative? Of 1952 perhaps.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



LATEST NEWS

BLOGS