3News » Home
Full Story

Employment law changes spark protests

9 comments | Post Comment email Email printer friendly Print    Text Size:
aA
aA
aA
The protesters promise further action if the changes aren't cancelled

The protesters promise further action if the changes aren't cancelled

video
Sat, 21 Aug 2010 6:06p.m.

By Janika ter Ellen

Workers around the country turned out in protest against National's proposed changes to employment laws today.

Unions in Auckland, Wellington and Christchurch all held rallies in the hope the Government will abandon plans to introduce the controversial legislation.

At first the Wellington march seemed more like a party than a protest involving 2000 workers, but when the talk turned to Government plans to limit unions' access to workplaces, the camaraderie turned to anger.

"That's a denial of the freedom of choice to belong to a union," says EPMU national secretary Andrew Little. "It's bad and it's wrong and we've got to stop it."

The Government wants to extend the 90-day probation period to all new workers, allow unions into the workplace only with the employer's permission and let workers cash in their fourth week's holiday for pay.

If passed, the changes could also require workers to produce a medical certificate after one day's sick leave.

Auckland's 600 protestors were just as angry and in Christchurch, Cathedral Square saw 400 impassioned workers.

The unions' campaign up until now has been heavily focused on the 90-day probation period, but today was about attacking the proposed changes as a whole.

"This government has declared war on the working poor," says Unite national secretary Matt McCarten, "and any self-respecting union has to fight it, and we will. We're going to fight it. No question. This is just a warm up."

The 90-day law passed its first reading in Parliament on Thursday, but Labour says it would be a disgrace if it made it to law and would disadvantage over 400,000 people starting new jobs every year.

"No one should be allowed to be sacked without a reason," says Labour's Phil Goff. "That's just fundamentally wrong."

National says the changes are fair, but unions say they won't give up until the Government does.

They say we'll be seeing a lot more protests.

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Comments [9]

Brent
23 Aug 2010 9:50p.m.

@Dante
The 90 day is negotiable with new employees regardless of the new law.
@Tom
The Union is stirring it up because they have nothing better to do, Past there use by date, The push is a collection for the Labour party, The Labour party is broke and the union stirring is pulling in funds in both collection and union fees being donated to labour, The funny thing is Andrew Little will be signing off on the donations with one hand and collecting the cheque with the other. (There's a Name for that)

Dante
23 Aug 2010 10:50a.m.

Can anyone tell me what was wrong with the laws already in place with dismissing employees? Surly there was nothing wrong with them I didn't hear any complaints and it also ensured that people were fired with good reason. I see the 90 day law as a step back in workers rights at a time where we should be pushing for job security. Can also lead to a step back in NZ wages.

Tom
23 Aug 2010 7:56a.m.

No one has answered the question 'why is NZ different when nearly every other developed country has similar law's - some with probation periods up to 12 months - any one ? - No did not think so. Those who support the Unionis are utter morons.

jan..
22 Aug 2010 4:12p.m.

Poor Frank has no ideas about union, I wonder if your father, mother to grandparents ever work under union before and if not, you must probably an outlet or a newcomer to my country..Get real matey!..

Jim
22 Aug 2010 3:59p.m.

For those of you out there that are convinced your managers don't like you and want to get rid of you. Most managers really don't want the headache of scheming to get rid of their staff. They've got other more important stuff to do. The 90 day rule will come in and it will hardly be a blip on a managers radar. The only time managers have to get rid of you is if you're an underperforming tw@t that's adding no value to the organisation. Then, the terrible manager should be able to get rid of you and give someone else a chance at a job you're taking for granted (one goes back on the dole and another comes off...evens out see). Personally, I'm tired of paying more tax than alot of people earn and then being told I'm some kind of w@anker for it. Rebuttle?

johnmillan
22 Aug 2010 12:15p.m.

Frank you are right up yourself with your National clonies you are just ONE too Thousands who are protesting,so would be better for you to suck eggs wimp.

Frank
22 Aug 2010 9:49a.m.

The usual 'rent a cround' - the stupid Unions, the unemployed, the mentally ill, the unemployable who want handouts and the usless redundant left. The Unions are idiots. This bill will help people into work. Most other developed countries have similar laws - why is NZ different ? People who oppose these are the redundant Unions are just anti employers and bosses and the psychotic left who would not have a clue how a modern economy operates..

dave
22 Aug 2010 12:47a.m.

welfare.
90 days.
I'm voting for whatever party has the best chance of stopping this "business first" crap.

johnmillan
21 Aug 2010 10:09p.m.

Come on dont worry about Key and his worthless clans,bring the country too a stand still,And show the rich that you have a life in NZ also.

Post a comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide here
Name:
Email: (Won't be published)
Comment:



3News Video 3News Audio